CommentsDisplaying Freedomwatcherguy's 10 most recent comments.

• ‘Journal of Medical Ethics’ Stands by Publication of ‘After-Birth Abortions’ Article

  February 29, 2012 at 1:21pm

  The following is an excerpt from the article. I am so creeped out. This is a glimpse inside the mind of a monster:

  it makes no sense to say that someone is harmed by being prevented from becoming an actual person. The reason is that, by virtue of our definition of the concept of ‘harm’ in the previous section, in order for a harm to occur, it is necessary that someone is in the condition of experiencing that harm.

  If a potential person, like a fetus and a newborn, does not become an actual person, like you and us, then there is neither an actual nor a future person who can be harmed, which means that there is no harm at all.

• ‘Journal of Medical Ethics’ Stands by Publication of ‘After-Birth Abortions’ Article

  February 29, 2012 at 2:51am

  Makes a good argument against abortion. Slippery slope. Where does it end up? Very creepy, saying the least. Chilling to realize these people are respected and actually considered experts in ethics; their opinions may actually be taken seriously. I am thoroughly creeped out.

• Obama to UAW: America Is ‘Not Just About Greed’ and ‘Trying to Climb to the Very Top’

  February 29, 2012 at 2:36am

  No, it’s not all about greed, is it? It’s about LUST…..for POWER.

• Mysterious Green Goop Falls From Sky in NY

  January 21, 2011 at 12:36pm

  Dr. Suess wrote a book about this. It’s called “ooblick”

• Possessed TX Voting Machine Only Allows Votes for Green Party

  October 22, 2010 at 11:33am

  death to the machines….

• Escaped Crocodile Causes Congo Plane Crash That Kills 20

  October 22, 2010 at 11:29am

  I am totally for crocs on planes——-as luggage!

• Firefighters Let Home Burn Because Owner Didn’t Pay $75

  October 5, 2010 at 11:42am

  Wow, this story has really garnered a lot of comments. To me, it’s about 2 things: personal responsibility and fairness. If we really do believe in personal responsibility, we have to let people experience the consequences of their bad choices. Also the fee applied to everyone in that area so it was fair. I wonder what the insurer will do, if they had fire insurance.

• Federal Judge Rejects Lawsuit Against Pledge and ‘In God We Trust’

  October 2, 2010 at 8:46pm

  Peters,
  Thanks for pointing that out, well said. Without God, everything does fall apart. The point I have put forward in comments elsewhere in this blog is that when the Founders cited God-given rights as the moral underpinning of the declaration of independence from the British empire, they literally founded the nation on the principle of the spirituality of the Individual. To me, this placing of the Individual in the position of primary importance is the core and essence of our national identity, its uniqueness and intrinsic value. If the Individual is not acknowledged to be spiritually endowed, the supremacy of the Individual is supplanted by the supremacy of groups. Individual freedom, which the founders saw as the highest good and which the Constitution and Bill of Rights were designed to protect, is replaced by whatever is perceived to be best for the largest group or “collective”. I totally agree that the getting rid of God is key tho the progressive agenda, and suggest that the reason it is key is because that is the only way to take the issue of individual freedom out of the equation. These issues are being fought in the courts. I would very much like to hear from yourself or anyone in this forum whether the argument above would be of any relevance or value in courts where these issues are being decided.

• Obama Omits ‘Creator’ From ‘Inalienable Rights’…Again

  September 27, 2010 at 9:20pm

  In reply to LSX.

  So, we now know it is intentional, but the question is why? However tempting it may be to ascribe sinister motivations couldn‘t it just be that it isn’t PC to acknowledge a Creator anymore and he would never say anything that isn’t PC? But….Considering how evil PC is, I guess that is a sinister motive!

• Article: CAIR Using Lawsuits and Intimidation to Make Islam ‘Dominant’

  September 22, 2010 at 9:23pm

  They are training Islamists how to defend their civil rights. Which don’t exist under Islam.
  Please check this out: Just copy & paste into your browser. This is the best thing I have ever read about the Islamist threat to the US and the world:

  6. The Muslim Mosque: A State Within a State .