Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: George Patton

Member Since: May 27, 2011

CommentsDisplaying George Patton's 10 most recent comments.

  • Fascism is the scapegoat of failed socialism. When socialism fails good little socialists need someone to blame because their faith in socialism is immovable. They never consider that it failed because the system is flawed, so they must blame someone. So they turn to fascism and blame anyone else…immigrants, jews, the wealthy, etc. They never scrap the system and opt for a free society, a republic, free markets, liberty….because that would mean they would have to give up the thing both socialists and fascist hold most dear…their authority over other men. The failure of socialism turns to violent fascism as socialist exact revenge on those blamed for the failure of socialism.

  • Here’s what these child-marxists don’t understand: You have the right to be naked, but not in a grocery store. You have a right to be drunk, but not while driving. You have the right to be in a government building, but that doesn’t mean you can break into one at 2am or stay in one after they close up for the night. The American left does not have the ability to use logic. Their logic goes like this: The sky is blue therefore all blue things are the sky. Just because A brings B that does not mean B brings A. If you have rain you will have clouds, but that does not mean if you have clouds you will have rain. IDIOTS.

  • Duped like you.

  • If socialism wins the day, you can bet that Santorum, Gingrich, and Paul will go down with all the bones in their knuckles broken. Mitt will look clean cut and simply adapt to it. I want a warrior, not a survivor.

  • Yes, again that’s the point…..Mass. Republicans (read LIBERALS) love socialist romneycare. Duh, liberals love socialism and dislike conservatives…and they vote for romney. What does that tell us about romney when socialist loving liberals vote for him overwhelmingly in Mass.??????????

  • Your argument is basically “Republicans in Mass. don’t really seem to dislike socialism (romneycare) so we might like it too, vote romney because Mass. republicans love his socialist program.”

  • A LION FOR LIBERTY. To beat obama and more importantly after he is beaten the next president must be a ferocious warrior for liberty. They must be like a lion, and their belief in liberty must be unwavering. When the progressives and liberal media pound them against the rocks they must endure it and stand up saying “Do your worst, for I will do mine.” Does that sound like Mitt? The result of liberalism is an evil world. In this fight against it we need a lion, not an unsure mouse. Mitt does not strike me as a lion for liberty. Gingrich is a lion. Santorum is a lion. Even Paul with his meek appearance is a lion when it comes to liberty. Mitt still seems unsure if liberty is the answer to the human condition. The other 3 to varying degrees seem to solidly believe that and would take swings at socialism with their last bit of strength.

    If socialism wins the day, you can bet that Santorum, Gingrich, and Paul will go down with all the bones in their knuckles broken. Mitt will look clean cut and simply adapt to it. I want a warrior, not a survivor.

  • He was a terrible writer. Every teenager writes like this. It is nothing more than typical teenage angst puked out on paper with flowery words. It is absolutely awful writing. Every 14 year old girl’s diary contains prose similar to this. He was a horrible writer and conceived horrible and evil things in his mind.

  • His facebook rant sounds like it was written by OWS; complaining about how people who live in “castles” are selfish and they don’t care about the peasants they mistreat. How he is just a lowly peasant and those mean people who live in castles keep him down.

    He sees himself as a “have-not“ and he blames the ”haves”. Because everyone knows that if your neighbor drives a lexus it forces you to drive a used ford escort. So what’s his solution…down with the “haves”…same solution as OWS.

  • @freedomluver

    You are an idiot. I point out that people on your side (those who support paul) are calling for murder and revolution, and you refuse to denounce them. Instead you denounce me for saying this is representative of paul supporters. Yet you prove that IT IS representative of paul supporters by your refusal to denounce them. Your silence and unwillingness to condemn such statements is tacit approval of them.

    Have fun wallowing in the filth of your fellow paulbots.