Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3

Member Since: January 20, 2011

CommentsDisplaying GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3's 10 most recent comments.

  • @ ayl Thank you so much for the correction, for it lead me to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_boosting
    Sorry for downgrading it by one, but on the bright side, it is less likely to be picked up on a key word screen. This shows how 3 can be detonated in the same location w/o being set off by rouge neutrons. Giving even more supporting evidence to the fact NY port authority is COMPLETELY responsible for bringing those structures down, intentionally killing NYFD witnesses who could have testified THERE WERE NO PLANES!
    Luv ya;^)

  • Pretty awesome!!

  • @inept A Faraday cage must surround what it is protecting, this is one of the reasons why cell phones don’t work on airliners.

    @boobshelterbomb Go hide in ur shelter, quick, the Russians are coming!! PS I don’t support big pharma like u and ur family, make sure ur kids get plenty of riddlene as obviously u avoid responsibility of living in reality.

    @tzion u have me confused w/ S. Jones who wrote a white paper disproving U-235, which uses tritium (radio active isotope of hydrogen, hence “hydrogen bomb”) fusion to start the fission process. View the city of Hiroshima where P-238 was used, an est 2% of the potential energy was released, meaning 98% of the radioactive material covered the city (it has a short half life)

    @R&S I assume u believe the “thermite BS”, so look into the chemical composition of GRANITE which contains the very same compounds as themite aluminum oxide(15%) and iron oxide. View Jones chemical analysis of the dust, the highest concentration was alumino silicates (zeolite used to absorb radiation at Fukashima and Chernobyl, catalyst for cracking crude oil) which he claims not to know where it came from. Granite 72% SiO2. Funny how the only pos u take is supporting the official claim airliners were involved, yet no other stance on ur beliefs. Show me where I am wrong, don’t just keep saying “b/c I said so”.

    @therealcon I’v seen “truthers” post pics of an intact fuselage on top of the WTC rubble. This is the way they keep the HOAX ali

  • Anyone who is shifting the blame from the port authority to this guy is BRAINWASHED to the point of denying reality. Watch the pilot episode of “The Lone Gunmen”, where this EXACT plot takes place. It was broadcast March 4th 2001, six months before the media fabricated HOAX started. Nothing more than life imitating art, and a buncha idiots wanting to believe they live in TV land.
    Military intelligence is an oxymoron, b/c nobody in the military has any intelligence (that is the very reason they went into the military).

  • @tzion So you aren’t going to brag about the “security” they provide: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wq2pGd9ViUM&feature=g-vrec&context=G236c5a1RVAAAAAAAACw

    How about the other “services” they provide like overlooking the US phone networks?

  • That is so funny cat, it just goes to show the “official” story changes more than the wind direction. “The fire suppression wasn’t working”, then “the fire suppression wasn’t working”: http://www.newser.com/story/comments/129173/chemical-reaction-brought-down-twin-towers-scientist.html
    Never even heard this line of crap until I went searching on a CIA sponsored search engine, yahoo. Evidently they have been promoting this line since the 10yr anv. Had the alum caught fire the light given off would have been seen reflected by the dark smoke, which would have been pitch black had it been jet fuel.
    FACT IS, NO FIREFIGHTER EVER CONFIRMED AN AIRLINER IN EITHER TOWER (PERIOD)
    The ONLY conformation was “small pockets of fire”. The com systems were intentionally downed to prevent reality from being seen. NYFD admin allowed those men to be covertly assassinated by caving in to NDA created in the cover up. Research why the bellows were invented by blacksmiths, there is a reason forced induction is NEEDED to work iron (steel takes even more energy).
    The body count as of last July, according to NY daily news was 1785. Yet the MSM still promotes 3K, a far cry from REALITY!
    “You can deny reality, but you can not deny the consequences of denying reality”- Ayn Rand
    This country has been in a tail spin of corruption the last ten years b/c they realize how easy the US public is to dupe.
    How many Americans does it take to screw in a light bulb? None, Americans can’t f

  • @ cat and any1 claiming “I seen it on TV” your understanding of aerodynamics is on a grade school level. Turn on a sports game, see the 1st down line or the running shot clock image beside the key on the floor. These are computer graphics images (CGI), the players can not see them on the field of play in real time, they are “FAKE”. It takes about 10yrs for tech to become part of our daily lives. Aluminum avg mid 20ksi tensile strength, A36 structural steel just under 100ksi tensile strength. Airframes are sheet aluminum forms riveted together, making the structure as a whole lighter than water (<0.5 specific gravity). Look at the airliner landing in the Hudson river, IT FLOATS! Bullets that shear steel plate travel 2-3000 fps and have a density 4x greater than alum (2.7sg vs 11.4sg). A 737 can not exceed 500 fps due to the drag that creates lift, the engines don't produce enough power at sea level. That puts the potential energy around 1/30th that of a bullet. 4mm of sheet aluminum can not shear 20mm of structural steel box column. You believe it's not logically possible due to so many cameras, but the FACT is IT'S PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. Brian Williams stated all network cameras feeds were being redirected to a single location and rebroadcast so all networks could "share" the footage. This was nothing more than a means to insert the CGI need to "make the statue of liberty disappear". Take another look at the footage IT WAS A HOAX not unlike the one he

  • @RJJinGadsden That comment was for kicknback, but the vid is very informative. The real damaging evidence is the craters left under each building. Silverstein tried to explain it as “glacial wear”, as if they built the towers over top a 100‘ hole in the ground and didn’t notice. The walls of the craters are grey due to the Al3O2 evaporating from the top layer left behind. These vapors can be seen rising in the days after demo. Here is a thermal image taken by NASA on 9/16: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/911/images/lg-map-therm1.jpg
    The blast radius can clearly be made out under each structure. Seven Jones disproves a “hydrogen bomb”, which is quit easy as this uses U-235. View modern pictures of Hiroshima where an atomic bomb was used, P-238 two different devices. Half life is much shorter, but they require much more resources and are much heavier, which is why they are optimal civil engineering devices. The MIC like the “terror” factor of U-235 radiation fall out they are cheaper and a lighter payload, reducing delivery cost as well.
    Should you doubt any claims, I am will to help you understand how they conform to the laws of physics.

  • The most complicated thing the port authority had to do was punch in the arming code. All skyscrapers have to submit a demo plan prior to the beginning of construction. The core columns were too thick for conventional demo. Your understanding of physics is very weak, not to mention a belief humans will never make anymore advancements beyond your personal comprehension.
    Listen to what really happened: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNuKAdGlxFo
    This info was repressed for over five years, so the thermite theory could be promoted on the MSM networks. Steven Jones dust data even backs it up showing alumina silicates which come from the Si2O2 and Al3O2 that make up the bulk of GRANITE being exposed to fusion temps. Zeolite (alumina silicates) were used at Chernobyl and Fukashima to absorb radiation.

  • Having seen this several months ago: youtube.com/watch?v=ixXg_tFJjSs

    I never even clicked on the original post, as I already knew what it takes to get inches off the ground.

    Know what else is fake, modern skyscrapers in global collapse due to fire.
    How naive do you have to be in continuing to believe a HOAX for ten years?.!.