Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: GymCy81

Member Since: January 12, 2011

CommentsDisplaying GymCy81's 10 most recent comments.

  • Translation from the (un)hidden liberal code of (un)ethics:

    To explain the supposed cold and aloofness.

    He says “… does not go to a lot of Washington Parties…?”
    - partly because, (unsaid) he has the parties come to the Whitehouse.

    He says ” …he is too busy …and needs time with the family…”
    - too busy because (unsaid) of the party planning at the Whitehouse
    and of course, got to play to moral sympathies (whether one believes them, or not..but it is pc convenient to espouse that notion) ‘its for the kids’ card…
    (like our expensive tax payer funded public education political slush fund system, and drops in student test scores compared to other nations, has proven that the system is really sold on that whole ‘its for the kids’ notion. Not. What school do the kids attend? What did you do to ‘stop’ a competitive good alternate education program in D.C.? ‘ For the kids? ‘ Not.)

    He says ” ..he (Boenher) had trouble getting his caucus to go along with doing the responsible thing on a whole bunch of issues over the past year…”
    uhhh…just what billion / trillion $ expensive add-on to the HUGE debt, ‘(ir)responsible’ thing(s), was someone supposed to really embrace due to playing some friendly golf?

    It seems that someones ‘pay grade’ is bit too high for their act…

    The question is, will the primary vetting process allow another actor to rise (with the help of some media darlings again), or will someone else, relatively m

  • The Top Ten Pro-Freedom Movies of All Time

    September 23, 2011 at 1:53pm

    “24”

    Yes, that was a TV series for 8 seasons – last aired in early 2010. (its available on DVD)

    A movie is supposedly going to be released in 2012.

  • The Top Ten Pro-Freedom Movies of All Time

    September 23, 2011 at 1:37pm

    In reply to The_Almighty_Creestof.

    “24”
    Yes, it was a TV series- for 8 seasons (last aired in early 2010). DVD’s are available.

    I understand that a movie is to be released in 2012.

  • imo,
    the subtext is:
    someone(s) are trying to push more conservatives to enter the race – to split the conservative votes (again) and thereby to indirectly provide a push, a lift to the pretend conservatives
    (liberals / moderates in hiding via their latest rhetoric that ‘hope’ their incorrect actions can be overlooked).

    Why do the establishment folks, the pundits avoid pushing for more liberals, with name recognition, entering the race?
    …because they do not want to water down their favorites chances? [but they do not mind watering down some conservatives chances?]

    imo, the pundits are playing the same ‘ol political football. It is silly, it is meant to confuse voters, and it is not good for America.

    Its like the pundits want their 1 vote to count more than once – by (mis) persuading their listeners via, the medias‘ ’push’ polling efforts, and spin etc.)

    Take a look at which candidates are spending the most $ to get their results, votes / $.
    Take a look at the 2008 primary vote / spending results.
    Also consider whom the media darlings were.

    The underlying reason for a high vote / $ spent ratio could be that those candidates have actions that match, or exceed the rhetoric…and thereby, the message is resonating and is more genuine.

    imo, the recent straw poll helped to begin to separate the wheat from the chaf.

    Prior Actions can speak much louder, and clearer, than Words.
    ( sans the media suppressing untarnished facts, and amplifying an

  • The unwritten subtext is:

    Carl Rove says that for his favorite candidate to gain (in addition to spending a lot of $) and put some distance between the other candidates,
    …then the consideration of more conservatives to enter the race would help split the conservative vote further (and by default, allow his faux conservative favorite to look better, than he really is).

    ummm…whom do you think that Mr. Roves favorite is that he is indirectly trying to give a lift to?
    my guess, Romney.

    But mit, ala romney /obama care, is not my pick.

    The pundits are interesting to listen to…so as to hear what they are not saying..and to see how they try to ‘push’ the polls.

    Yet, actions (of candidates) can speak much louder that (pundits and candidates) words…. even though many in the media will try to (mis) characterize the information. Do you ever wonder why that is sadly the case, and why they are served up a tv microphone? It could partially be associated with unsaid $$$.

    If you want to see which candidates messages and actions are genuinely resonating with the people, they try to monitor the $$$ spent vs. the vote results.
    Take a look at the 2008 primary / caucus results:
    Who were the candidates that spent the most, but got the least results per the $ spent?
    Who spent the lessor amount, but got greater results?

    Today, find and take a look at the current figures: $ spent vs. early straw poll results

    Whom is really resonating the best, thus far ?

  • Herman Cain Issues Apology to Muslims

    July 28, 2011 at 11:36am

    ROMNEY ?

    Has anyone else noticed how the liberal media just does seem to be in attack mode about Romney?
    (is that their GOP favorite…because that is whom they think Obama could win against?) Notice how the ‘polls’ seem to favor Mr. Romney – the one that is currently getting the least resistance by the liberal media?
    Is that a coincidence, or someones plan…(again)?

    Mr. CAIN,
    Keep on persevering through the adversity being served up.
    Your courage and principles are earning the respect of more and more…

    BACHMAN, CAIN, PAUL (alphabetical order only) both seem to be genuine in what they say, and in what they do (not pretenders / actors).
    That is good for the USA, for a change.

    At this point, they are competing for the same voters. By consolidating them…we will be on the road to restoring the USA…

    Warning: per the unwritten 2007 GOP establishment playbook for primaries, at the same time – or ahead of schedule, some may be trying to more quickly consolidate the liberal GOP candidates (even though they say that they are conservative, even though their words do not match their deeds). And the liberal media will help that cause (via push polls, etc.)

  • There are certainly more critical, and important issues to address than this certificate One.

    The Constitutional requirement to be a President is listed in article 6.1. It is also good that someone(s) are fearlessly working to take on, shake out, the whole truths – no matter their ‘current’ perceived level of importance or how late that they are found.
    Just wondering, does the text size look a tad larger on the name line, and a tiny bit smaller on the other lines?
    Did the typewriters, at that time, at that hospital, have the ability to adjust the text size?

    Again, with the $ deflating, the government -bureacracy- growth, the extremely high government spending, costs rising, private jobs growth being stagnant, and the quiet promoting of a sweeping decay of the prior American values and replacing them with an unproven, unsuccessful prior value system – their are certainly more issues and concerns than what a certificate portrays.

  • There are more important issues than this One.

    As a side question:
    Did the typist of the certificate have the ability to change the size of the font?
    Does it appear that the font size in the name row, is different than in the next row of information?

    Perhaps a review and comparison of other certificates, at that time, could help to sort thru that question, and find the whole truth.

    There are a lot more important issues and concerns in this country than this One.

  • Another method:
    When Congress prepares the budget, the line item $ related to PP should = 0

    So, if the President vetoes, or approves, the budget, then there are no federal funds for PP.

    p.s. Congress did not pass a budget last year…it is operating on a continuiing resolution.
    imo, the next ‘continuiing resolution’ should include a discontinuiing of PP funds (and other items too)within the resolution.

    p.s.s.
    Of course, the ‘health’ of women will be trumpeted, ad nauseum again, as a concern by some in the media.
    But uhhh, didn’t their legislative passed / signed Obamacare get their Health all ‘fixed’ up – or did it get overlooked by the leaders that they support?
    So, uhhh, really, just where should they (mis)point their fingers?

  • GOP Rep. Will Introduce New Strict Gun Law

    January 12, 2011 at 10:47am

    In reply to TruthTalker.

    Rahm Emanuel, a politician, has said that “…do not let a crisis go to waste …” which from what I can tell by some of the actions that have occurred that someone thinks that if a wrong occurs, that then that is an opportunity to exploit the situation to create another wrong (under the guise, cover, or media marketing that it is a purported good).

    By my simple non elitist math and looking at the above thinking: 1 wrong + 1 wrong = 2 wrongs

    If you look a that math, something does equal a right. That is, it is doubly wrong, not right.

    So, someone now wants to hijack the what the voters across the country said, and turn the attention due to the inappropriate act of one person in Az. ? – While ignoring the corrective legislative actions of the incorrect legislative actions that many did that lead to the recent election results?

    The spin masters love to spin. Nothing new.

    Yes, how about facing the truth, openly and truthfully?