New Contributor Column: MRC Head Brent Bozell on “SHAMELESS BIAS BY OMISSION”

User Profile: iamme73

Member Since: January 13, 2011

CommentsDisplaying iamme73's 10 most recent comments.

  • This is just a flat out lie. Look, every black voter who votes regularly has cast many more votes for candidates who are not black, then they have for candidates who are black. This is objective reality. So no black people don’t vote for black candidates 90% of the time.

    In fact, the only group of voters in this nation who have a very large majority who have never or maybe once or twice voted for a candidate of a different racial background are white Americans.

    Every other group of voters in this nation regularly vote for candidates who are not of the same racial background.

    It is ONLY white Americans voters, most of whom have either never voted for someone of a different race or rarely do it.

  • First off Africa is a continent, not a country. Secondly, you don’t get to decide for other Americans what it means to be American for them.

  • Wow do some people really believe that those who had an issue with what he said were focused on the word black versus African American?

    He word chose was not the issue. If he would have used the word African Americans, people would have rightfully still had an issue with his words. What he said is reflective of a racial attitude that no elected official should hold.

    No, his only defense is that he didn’t mean to say black people.

  • Clearly he said black. That is not debatable. His only defense is that he didn’t mean to say black people. But this idea that he didn’t say black people is just blatantly a lie.

  • Wow, amazing show of manhood and toughness to punch a much older man cause he said something you don’t like. He was 32 and J. Ventura was 55 when this happened.

    Yes, what a fine example other men in the early 30‘s should go out and punch men in the their mid 50’s to prove their manhood and toughness if they don’t shut up when they are told to do so.

  • This President is a historic figure because he is the first. This cannot be denied. HIs place in the history of this nation is already secured.

    If you all think the history books will write that this President was a communist, socialist, Kenyan, blah, blah, blah, then you believe the political opponents of popular Presidents didn’t have ill words about those Presidents. The losers of elections never write the history.

  • Wow what a ridiculous headline. His specific words had no ranking. He said he considered his first 2 years, not a full four year term, and his administrations legislative accomplishments. Only in the minds of the Blaze is that saying he is the fourth best President, what a silly and misleading headline.

  • The ignorance of so many posters is astonishing. They are making blanket statements about Africans and Muslims as if all or most Africans and Muslims live in this manner. They are making blanket statement nation in which they have no idea the history of this individual nations. Instead many are focusing on race and or religion. This is the definition of ignorance.

    Then to connect this to African Americans is just sick. To connect these nations to President Obama is just sick. To make the statements that colonization was the height for these nations is just sick and wrong. To imply that African American should thank that their ancestor were enslaved us evil.

    There is something wrong with too many blaze posters.

  • That sure didn’t look like 50 teenagers. More like 3 to 5 teenagers. The blaze will report anything that justifies its’ world view. I looked this story up and couldn’t find it referenced on any news website. Not one, the media will cover violence.

    You all are gullible as hell if you believe 50 teenagers clashing with the police and the fire department wouldn’t get mentioned on tv or in newspapers. This is a sham story.

  • The question remains unanswered, why would legislators, who claim to want a smaller government, expand government by creating new laws for a problem that does not exist?

    There is no wide spread voter fraud. So why is it that laws that worked for these states all the way up until this year now not good enough? Again, none of the states creating these new laws point to any voter fraud, nor do they explain how a voter ID will prevent voter fraud.

    The other question is why would voters who claim to want a small government be in favor of government expanding in this way and limiting the freedom of voters? Again, there has never been any proof of wide spread voter fraud, so why are you small government types okay with this expansion and creation of an unnecessary law?