Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: jzs

jzs

Member Since: October 03, 2010

CommentsDisplaying jzs's 10 most recent comments.

  • Ya gotta admit, she’s got a point. A lot of women object to the Government dictating when probes should be stuck inside their privates without medical justification, not to mention the government dictating a script that doctors must read to their patients. Lots of people don’t want the government inserting itself, as it were, between a doctor and their patient, as pleasing as that prospect is is to aging white Republicans who are no longer able to insert their probes into young women.

    As MCDAVE says, when Republicans can‘t insert themselves into a doctor’s office and into women’s insides, the “moral fiber” of the country is deteriorating. Sure is McDave! You nailed it, so to speak.

  • UV light outide what the human eye can detect isn’t mentioned in the Bible. It doesn’t exist. Nice try liberal scientist trying to invent and pretend that something exists in the world that is not in the Bible. God isn’t stupid, and if there were any important things, like evolution, or cancer causing UV light that were real and effected humans, it would be in the Bible, which is basically a science textbook and includes all you need to know about science.

    These guys might be able to sucker the liberals but if it‘s not in the Bible it’s irreligious crap that will send you to the underworld. to be ruled for eternity by Hades (actually that’s Greek mythology, but you know what I mean, the Biblical equivalent).

  • OlefromMN, are you still working? You got a job right? And the big three are still alive and making a profit rather than permanently shutting down? So what’s your point, you’d rather be jobless and have the US automobile collapse and cease to exist?

    Seriously MN, what is the scenario you would have preferred? I‘m not saying you don’t have a point of some kind, I‘m just saying I don’t understand what it is.

    If you don’t like your job in the auto industry, why don’t you get another job, in, you know, another industry?

  • Uh, excuse me, but I think there’s some confusion here. Judges make decisions based on US law or by precedents set by by other US courts interpreting US law. Making decisions on any other basis is grounds for impeachment and removal from office.

    Durn right this new law is “Constitutional.” So would be a new law saying that Kansas will not be obligated to adhere to the agreement between the Federation and the Klingons. Judges are required to follow US law, not Federation or Klingon law, regardless of any future treaty they might make.

    It would also be Constitutional to pass a law which states that the fourth through thirteenth dimensions of the universe are not recognized as part of Kansas and that only lifeforms that exist witing the three dimensions officially recognized by Kansas can apply for a driver’s license.

    Kansas, are you vying with Arizona to be the stupidest state om the US of A?

  • Uh, I think there’s some confusion here. Judges make decisions based on US law or by precedents set by by other US courts interpreting US law. Making decisions on any other basis is grounds for impeachment and removal from office.

    Dang right this new law is “Constitutional.” So would be a new law saying that Kansas will not be obligated to adhere to the agreement between the Federation and the Klingons. Judges are required to follow US law, not Federation or Klingon law, regardless of any future treaty they might make.

    It would also be Constitutional to pass a law which states that the fourth through thirteenth dimensions of the universe are not recognized as part of Kansas and that only lifeforms that exist in three dimensions can apply for a driver’s license.

    Kansas, are you vying with Arizona to be the stupidest state om the US of A?

  • Jaycen, no, that’s not how a debate works. You didn’t take a debating class in high school did you? The participants in the debate aren’t allowed to talk over the other person. Each person is allowed to present their point of view and the judges decide if those in the debate answered the debate points or not.

    I take it you don’t watch political debates either. The moderates have to work to prevent the candidates from talking over one another, because that’s not acceptable in a debate.

    Sorry, you have your idea about what constitutes a “fair” debate from Hannity and others like him. When one person can “win” an argument by talking over the other person in a debate, that’s not a debate is it? You‘d know that if you’d taken a debate class in high school.

    But she did answer his question. He was trying to compare the layoffs that Bain was responsible for with the saving the auto industry in the US. Wasserman pointed out the President Obama saved 10s of thousands of jobs in the industry itself, and, something the Republicans forget, the jobs of the thousands of vendors that sell to the auto industry. President Obama resucued a large part of the US economy. That was her answer. Sorry if you don’t like that answer, this FOX guy sure didn’t, which is why he tried to shout her down.

    Jaycen, they may not have debate rules at Camp Crystal, but they do in the real world. No, trying to shout down someone in a debate isn’t a strength, it shows a w

  • VanceUppercut, not sure if you’re be sarcastic or not, but yeah, he’s misunderstood. His failure was his belief that humans posses more Christian values, such as humility and empathy than they actually do. He thought that he could create the Christian conception of Heaven here on Earth: everyone is equal, people aren’t motivated to take from others because of greed and that humans simply live happily without the richest spending their every effort to take from others. Like Christians say Heaven is like. His philosophy was to create the Christian veiw of Heaven here on Earth. He thought humans were more motivated by love than by hatred and greed.

    But he was simply wrong about human nature. Most human beings, although not all, are not motivated by altruism, or by the desire to help each other, at least not outside the family unit. For better or worse human beings are a product of evolution, and the values Christ taught are, at best, laid on top of a nature that is “red in tooth and claw.”

    And of course his rep is further devaluated by his assocition with so called “communist” countries, ones that actually aren’t communist at all. They are simply oppresive dicatorships. quite the opposite of the kind of government Marx imagined.

    But yeah, Marx got a bad rap because their was a huge flaw in is reasoning. He thought that on average people were motivated by values Christ taught, such as caring for your fellow human being as much as yourself. But he wa

  • The article said, “And guess what was required reading? The Supreme Court case Bush v. Gore about the 2001 election.”

    Gee that’s weird, studying a contemporary Supreme Court decision in a law class. I thought they‘d study the law of gravity or the law of diminishing returns or Murphy’s law or something. So, is this right, when they say Obama taught “law” they mean like Supreme Court decisions?

  • PATTY HENRY says, “Obama is a communist/marxist/socialist/anarchist/anti-American TRAITOR.”

    PATTY, I see you’ve committed several different forms of government to memory. Good for you. But you must realize, for example, that you can’t be both a socialist and anarchist at the same time. Those are mutually exclusive.

    Good work throwing the kitchen sink on insults. But on making sense? Not so much.

  • That guy did look of peevish doing the old Hannity thing of asking a question and then immediatly trying to talk over her when she answered the question. I know that talking over someone is viewed here as “winning an argument” but it is actually what non-journalist do, not the real ones. She was poised though as always. You’d think by now this guy would know better than to try to match wits with Wasserman.