CommentsDisplaying Dweeby_EE's 10 most recent comments.

• Indonesian Muslim Woman Publicly Caned for ‘Close Proximity’ With Man

  April 12, 2011 at 5:32pm

  In reply to Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}.

  Yeah… Probably correct… The “New World Order” as envisioned by George H.W. Bush is one world government. Since I can’t elect such a thing, kinda scares me.

  As far as this is concerned, if they can find, if true, the molesters, they should be put to the cane as well.

  I don’t have a problem with corporal punishment as a rule. It is effective, efficient, and quickly over. Since there is pain, there is corrective incentive: “I won’t do that again!” You go through it, and it’s done. No unproductive imprisonment that costs taxpayer money. And the perpetrator gets to go right back to his/her job or duties, being a productive member of society. They don’t lose their job. So, it is a net gain, not a net drain for society.

  Folks probably don’t remember what that kid said in Singapore, when asked if he would ever spray paint a car again. He said, “Not is Singapore man!”

  Bet they don’t commit adultery again….

• Cop Gives Couple Ticket After Helping Them Rush to Hospital for Baby Delivery

  January 5, 2011 at 7:22pm

  In reply to Warphead.

  Sure Task… I agree that you are the best judge for things safe UNDER YOUR CONTROL. But do you have any control over the lugnut pulling out in front of you? No. Do you have control of the little grey squirrel wanting that acorn across the street? Huh-uh… Nope. How about the guy driving in front of you that didn’t see you about to blow his doors off, when he swerves to miss the cute little squirrel? Uh… that’d be –No again.

  So… In review… Is 105 for you when everyone else is 45, 55, and 65 a safe speed? Ever?

  Nope.

• Cop Gives Couple Ticket After Helping Them Rush to Hospital for Baby Delivery

  January 5, 2011 at 7:10pm

  In reply to Oil_Robb.

  Hey Snow…

  ————————————-
  “I hope the judge throws this ticket out the window.

  Common sense is needed more and more today.

  ————————————-

  Now, FAR be it from ME to defend unions. I’ll drive 100 miles to cross a picket line. The UAW is the reason I have to pay $20k for a run-of-the-mill-no-frills-plain-jane-average-basic-B-flat car. I hate unions. Not the people who comprise them, just the unions themselves. They are just the exercises in protection and perpetuating mediocrity.

  But when you talk of “common sense…” Don’t you think that a 105 mph rate of speed is MORE dangerous than the 30 seconds of time saved getting to the front door? I mean… Seriously…. You hit a squirrel @ 105, and they’ll be surgically removing the tail pipe from your a$$.

• DADT Survives Senate Filibuster, Expected to Pass

  December 18, 2010 at 8:01pm

  Yup. Well put. And why stop there? Partners? How about groups? Group marriage and polygamy? After all, we cannot discriminate against those folks…

  See what happens when congress makes military decisions? I’m convinced, especially recently, that congress makes no good decisions anymore. They exist for their own perpetuation. The “How Dare You” attitude these waste products take with all of us the American Voter is disgusting and outrageous.

• DADT Survives Senate Filibuster, Expected to Pass

  December 18, 2010 at 4:56pm

  Yeah… Look, two reasons why this is not good.

  1 – Openly gay members of the armed forces are more likely to be killed on the battlefield. And that is because of trust issues. And more stress.

  2 – Other (namely “enemy”) armies who potentially capture these openly gay soldiers / airmen do not share our “politically correct” acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle affectation, and will just kill them.

  Ultimately, this is just one more instance of civilian congressional interference into military matters that need to remain exclusively military. The military fought WW1 and WW2. Congress fought Korea, Vietnam, and every war, skirmish, conflict, policing action since. Which ones have been decisive victories? Which ones are we still fighting?

  Congress is way too involved with military matters; in how the military is allowed to fight. The military is fully cognizant of what and who is acceptible and able to do the job. Seriously, what could those idiots in congress possibly know about it? Just write the checks “PeloReid,“ quit your ”Behar-ing,” and get the heck out of the way…

• Update: Gunman Identified in Fla. School Board Shooting

  December 14, 2010 at 6:42pm

  See how Hollywood influences unstable people?

  This has got to be Hollywood’s fault, right? I mean for goodness sake… a V with a CIRCLE??!? Taken right out of the movie!

  Did he have a Guy Fawkes mask? Or maybe his own little mustache and goatee?

  I say we ban all violent movies. Can’t you people see what happens when these irresponsible directors glorify blood guts and gore?

  Nothing less than G rated movies!! That’s what we need! “Sponge Bob The Motion Picture Rev. 33: Another incident at Bikini Bottom! Where’s the Top!?!”

• A Soros Story: Recounts, Coincidences, and Connections

  December 14, 2010 at 11:37am

  In reply to tower7femacamp.

  No, there is nothing small fry about Soros. That dude is lurking in cover around almost every manipulative entity / organization / group effort in at least the North American continent, if not globally. He seems to be focused on us, for the moment. But he appears to have his little age-spotted sausage fingers in many different pies.

  We need to fix the lights in the room, turn ‘em up to full brightness, then start turning things over to look at the undersides. I really loathe being manipulated. And it makes it very frustrating when I have to live with and have the same voice as others who have been manipulated. AND…. it is enraging to know that the others don’t care that they are being manipulated.

• Condoleeza Rice Corrects Katie Couric on Iraq War History

  December 13, 2010 at 5:19pm

  Well done, Ms. Rice. Yet one more perfect illustration of how logic and intelligence are wielded to destroy liberal assertion and attempted revisionism.

• Democrat Revolt: Which House Member Said ‘F*** the President’?

  December 10, 2010 at 1:07pm

  I‘d like to illustrate the illogic of Carolyn’s position.

  Let’s put aside for a moment that the tax cuts being proposed are not in reality a “cut” of anything. They are a continuance of EXISTING TAX RATES.

  She is adamant that the rich keeping more of their money will not result in more jobs. She is also adamant that middle class folks with more money will spend the money and create jobs.

  Let’s also put aside for the moment the trend of increased middle class savings (Thank the Lord Jesus for that by the way…). What happens when the lower classes spend more money? It goes into the businesses. Businesses (and by extension, the rich…) make more money. What do businesses do with the flush cash? They make improvements and expand, build, create, brainstorm, develop, etc… They pay their board, they pay themselves and they pay their employees. In this particular nutshell, her position is that the lower classes pay the rich (small and big business…) to create jobs for all the classes to do.

  Hmmmmm. Isn‘t that the same thing as what she says doesn’t work? With upper income tax cuts, the rich, (small and big business…) have more money to pay the board, pay themselves, pay their employees, make improvements and expand, build, create, brainstorm, develop, etc…

  With middle and lower class tax cuts, the rich, (small and big business…) have more money to pay the board, pay themselves, pay their employees, make improvements and expand, build, create, brainstorm, develop, etc…

  And if you do them both, 1+1 actually equals around 7, because people who were once a drain on the system now become a contributor, since they are working. This puts more people on tax roles, putting more money in the rich, (small and big business…) to pay the board, pay themselves, pay their employees, make improvements and expand, build, create, brainstorm, develop, etc…

  History proves without any doubt that this is EXACTLY what the rich do with money that is not threatened with inefficiency and government confiscation. The rich, (small and big business…) ALWAYS try to put money in places where it makes more. Period.

• PA Town Removes 57-Year-Old Nativity Scene From Gov’t Building: ‘Highly Disrespectful’

  December 7, 2010 at 2:37pm

  Those that find offensive a symbol of Love, Peace, Joy, and Redemption, need to look inward and find the cause of their hatred.

  I’ve said it so many times, but here goes again…. If you take offense at something, that’s YOUR problem. Not anyone else’s. I have absolutely no control over your mental state. YOU have complete control over your emotions and attitudes. Those that take offense at the creche CHOOSE to take offense at the creche. They don’t have to… They just CHOOSE to. I see the same things every day….from children. People need to grow up, find a little maturity somewhere.