CommentsDisplaying McPig's 10 most recent comments.

• White House Releases Obama’s Long-Form Birth Certificate

  April 27, 2011 at 7:04pm

  Bet you think it was the guy on the grassy knoll too…. LOL.

• White House Releases Obama’s Long-Form Birth Certificate

  April 27, 2011 at 7:03pm

  In reply to Miss Muffin.

  @ missmuffin

  Grab a mirror honey if you want to see a real loser. It is always soooo funny. The marxists lose the argument and they drop into ad hominem. Kinda sad, really.

• White House Releases Obama’s Long-Form Birth Certificate

  April 27, 2011 at 7:00pm

  1.) Nice COPY, but like a forgery it is STILL not the actual ORIGINAL that was handed to the Obama’s when the baby was born. Let me say that again: IT IS NOT THE ORIGINAL, IT IS ANOTHER COPY. Where is the original? This is again, “a computer generated copy” it’s not even a microfiche print. Sorry, I don’t fully buy it. And I eschew conspiracy theories; I actually believe Oswald did shoot Kennedy.

  Do I think someone would collude to fake this “certified copy?” Could be. It’s in the realm of the do-able. There is a lot at stake if Obama should be found ineligible and fraudulent. I always found it odd that lefties who see a huge right wing conspiracies to fake stuff, and lie about things, who have plots behind every tree accept this so blithely as gospel.

  2.) Mr. Obama has still not explained his obfuscation about his dual US/BRITISH citizenship. He lied about the Kenyan citizenship issue to HIDE the British citizenship issue. I am sure were it to become an election issue a letter to the British Home Office surrendering that British citizenship would suddenly appear…. Convenient….

  Warn you now… re-elect this guy and by the end of the second term the worlds main currency will NOT be the US Dollar, we will be a defaulting, bankrupt, debtor nation, and the “Age of America” will be officially over.

• New Book Claims to Show ‘Obama Is Not Eligible to Be President’

  April 21, 2011 at 3:51pm

  In reply to Catamit.

  Naw… I think the practise back then was the fathers race determined the childs, especially in uber liberal Hawaii.

• New Book Claims to Show ‘Obama Is Not Eligible to Be President’

  April 21, 2011 at 3:46pm

  I am sitting here peering at my aged 1952 ORIGINAL Birth Certificate from New Mexico. We will NEVER see Obama’s ORIGINAL because I beleive one showing a U.S. birth doesn’t exist: All you will ever see is the 2009 computer generated certificate from a digital record on a form revised in Nov 2001 that the Obama campaign posted on Stop the Smears.

  Obama is hiding the original, and obfuscating about the fact of his real citizenship. He is spending millions to prevent access to it.

  And anyway, even IF BHO were born in Hawaii, the fact is that since his father was a British Citizen (from the Crown Colony of Kena) his son BHO II, is ALSO a British citizen by British Law. A status which has to be formalled renounced by written notice to the Home Office. It does not “expire” automatically and BHO and his minions obfuscate by blathing on about his Kenyan citizenship expiring. Never was about Kenyan citizenship. If he will lie and fog about that I am certain he’d lie about the existance of a real original birth certificate. His posted electronic copy is BS. I have two electronically generated copies for the same sort for my kids, they are adopted, and the only FACT that is technically accurate on either certificate is the actual date of birth.

  WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE? I have mine, I am sure you, or your parents have yours. Heck, I even have a baby footprint on mine. One simple posting of the real thing, the ORIGINAL, would kill all the birther issues dead….

  Of course the dual British / American citizenship issue would remain…

  Can the President of the United States be a British Citizen?

  Reality is that tomorrow BHO could renounce his American citizenship and claim a British one. Ugly but true.

  This birth certificate matters because if it’s true, and BHO was ineligible, it would be the biggest fraud and distortion of our political process in history! I believe many will continue to hide the facts, not because of BHO or loyalty to him, but because admitting an ineligible man became president might destroy any faith in the systems integrity.

  And I found this very interesting.

  Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate
  Signs affidavit declaring long-form, hospital-generated document absent

  Read more: Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate

  http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1KBlRajXe

• Could Your Shotgun Soon be Outlawed? Maybe, If the ATF Has Its Way

  April 19, 2011 at 2:25am

  In reply to trolltrainer.

  @beckisnuts

  Actually… no. I’ll blame you and your little encephalographically challenged clones.

• Could Your Shotgun Soon be Outlawed? Maybe, If the ATF Has Its Way

  April 19, 2011 at 1:19am

  I know you guys/gals already know this, but the “sporting use” has always been the 5th columnist of the gun grabber arsenal. The 2nd Amendment was never about hunting or sporting. It was not even about guns for personal self-defense, as those normal usages were a given by BOTH sides of the Federalist/Anti-Federalist debates at the time of the ratification.

  No, the sole real purpose of the 2nd was to allow the citizens to oppose tyranny in government. Read Federalist Papers 29 and 40 for more. So if ANY arms are “protected” it is military arms: those capable of opposing a standing army controlled by a tyrant(s). A fully automatic M-16 would have, in the framers view, more relevance and standing to the right to arms than your over-under skeet gun.

  Madison, arguing in Federalist 29 for a standing army (which technically he did not get) states that any such army would be 1/100th of the eligible population, or about 35 to 50 thousand troops. He argued: How could they be a threat to liberty when opposed by “500,000 citizens with arms in their hands.” Shades of April 19th, 1775!!!! Nope, it’s not about “sporting” it’s about the ultimate right to control your life: a trump card on runaway government by the use of force, if necessary and unavoidable.

  Remember the shooting war of the American Revolution actually began over two key issues: Taxation and Gun Control. When Paul Revere rode out on April 19th it was mainly to warn the countryside that the “Regulars were out” heading to seize the militia stores of gunpowder at Concord. The battles at Lexington and Concord were the colonials resisting a British attempt to disarm the militia by denying it ammunition, i.e. gun control. Had we not had our own guns and ammo, the American Revolution might have been stillborn.

  We became a nation and got to where we are because we had arms, were willing to commit treason against our lawful government, and fire on the Kings troops. The principles are constant and immutable: and ultimately the world is still full of monsters who would enslave the unwary and unprepared. We would be foolish to forget that.