CommentsDisplaying MERRYRIVER's 10 most recent comments.

• Michelle Malkin still waging one-sided war with Coulter

  April 5, 2012 at 3:41pm

  In reply to b.mclane.

  I agree with you on all accounts.

• Michelle Malkin still waging one-sided war with Coulter

  April 5, 2012 at 3:40pm

  Malkin’s post is offensive. To women. About herself. Certainly about Coulter and also about Palin. Coulter doesn’t write “women’s” material, while Malkin does and Palin does, too and that’s not complimentary about them while it IS complimentary to say as much about Coulter.

  Let me explain a bit more: “women’s“ material or the tiresome ”female stereotypical” content that Malkin does well, as does Palin, but that Coulter has long since risen above if she ever was involved in it. The “female stereotypical” or typecasted-female content is hyperbolic, sarcastic-cutey and disrespectful emotionally while it maintains some higher-authority that it does not, in fact, represent. It’s that old “b”-y stuff that many women have long escaped and have never liked yet sadly, Malkin and oftentimes Palin (AND the ‘Palinistas’) keep drumming in utterly annoying method. Malkin just doesn‘t like Romney and we all know Palin doesn’t, nor do her fans, and that sort of jealous-competitive-need-to-put-down other women thing is what Malkin’s post negating Coulter is about (because Coulter has maintained ongoing support for Romney) (and even Romney has been kind about Palin and Malkin, yet they ridicule him).

• ‘Sympathy’: See the Terrorist Paintings by Norman Rockwell’s Granddaughter

  March 6, 2012 at 8:38am

  And that “painting” of Bin Laden…what are those objects streaming out of and around him? They look like snakes to me. OBL, an evil man who she dares to present with “bows” though it comes off as snakes, not what she intended.

• ‘Sympathy’: See the Terrorist Paintings by Norman Rockwell’s Granddaughter

  March 6, 2012 at 8:37am

  I assume this woman has given all that evil-Capitalist-American money away and she now lives in a van down by the river after denouncing all that inheritance, financially and culturally? I mean, it must be a real burden to her having to inherit so much money from all that she appears to loathe like the U.S.A., freedom, defense, security, all those awful investments that produced all that money that she‘s by now parted with because it’s so loathesome to her…

• Major Democratic Fundraiser at Van Jones ‘Take Back the American Dream Conference’: The American Dream Is Totally About Sharing and Redistributing the Wealth Because Free Houses and HealthCare Are a Right

  October 4, 2011 at 7:35am

  And someone ask Ms. Hess to divy-up her residence so there’s a family residing in every room of wherever she lives, which she’ll then be paying for (educating their children, feeding those families, providing them with “health care” and “housing”)…

  Leftists such as Ms. Hess always preach about these Communist-notion utopian demands but then they retreat pompously to their well-padded private lives where they get to preach on the high-and-mightiness of telling everyone else what to do.

• Major Democratic Fundraiser at Van Jones ‘Take Back the American Dream Conference’: The American Dream Is Totally About Sharing and Redistributing the Wealth Because Free Houses and HealthCare Are a Right

  October 4, 2011 at 7:31am

  Anyone know where Ms. Hess acquired her wealth? If she’s “a major Democrat donor,“ where and how did she become capable of donating ”major” monies to any political cause or person?

  She either married it or otherwise inherited it, perhaps? …just taking a guess here.

• Major Democratic Fundraiser at Van Jones ‘Take Back the American Dream Conference’: The American Dream Is Totally About Sharing and Redistributing the Wealth Because Free Houses and HealthCare Are a Right

  October 4, 2011 at 7:28am

  Ms. Hess says “health care, education and housing are rights, they’re a right…”

  Where is that written that those issues are “rights”? No where as to the U.S.A. What Ms. Hess is demanding, along with other Leftists like her, is something else, another nation not this one. They seem to be practicing some sort of belief system if not religious fervor that goes unchallenged but lacks any governmental definition or substantiation, and worse, it is at the costs of what this nation is about: individual freedom to gain and win or lose. One wonders just where Ms. Hess thinks her declared “rights” are substantiated…while her demands as such actually work to destroy what this nation IS about per our Constitution.

  Behold the “new” “rights” of Ms. Hess and other Communists like her.

• Major Democratic Fundraiser at Van Jones ‘Take Back the American Dream Conference’: The American Dream Is Totally About Sharing and Redistributing the Wealth Because Free Houses and HealthCare Are a Right

  October 4, 2011 at 7:24am

  Ms. Hess’s statements (in the video report of this post), in which she declares “health care, education and housing…are rights, they’re rights…” needs to be confronted very specifically because this is essentially the ongoing unsupported declaratoin that the Left continues to make and upon which they’re demanding the destruction of capitalism and promoting class warfare.

  To see where this leads when unconfronted, these declarations by people such as Ms. Hess, look at Cuba. An elitist, demanding-and-violent crowd made Ms. Hess’s demands and look at the results in Cuba: “everyone” lives in borderline hovels or somewhat better, no jobs other than what are doled out or assigned by the “high committee” of dictator-rule, if anyone objects they‘re imprisoned for life or they’re executed without trial (their views already known, executed for their views of wanting to figure their lives independently of dictator-rule), the “health care” they “receive” is truly abhorrent when anything beyond an aspirin is needed…Ms. Hess’s ideas/demands as spoken in the video represent an insistence on reducing civilization to some sort of lower echelon of non-achievement where individuals can’t do for or on their own but instead insist they be provided for (and then they aren‘t when the process runs it’s course, as in Cuba and other places like Ms. Hess expects we become).

• Obama’s Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett: The Point of Government Is to Give People a Livelihood so They Can Provide for Their Families

  September 29, 2011 at 7:17am

  And, in all seriousness where Jarrett is concerned, she IS a communist. Of the Marxist variety, certainly — her and all the ‘special class’ live luxuriously — but the idea of government is theirs and only theirs: it owns, controls, hands out all, the people get broken rice cookers (the Fidel model).

• Obama’s Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett: The Point of Government Is to Give People a Livelihood so They Can Provide for Their Families

  September 29, 2011 at 7:13am

  Valerie Jarrett, the spoiled child adult child, so special, just like Nancy Pelosi, so special…

  Aaack! How in Heaven’s name did this woman EVER get into the White House? What exactly is WRONG with the Democratic Party that they would even entertain the idea of placing such a despoiled mind as Jarrett’s there?

  She’s “well educated” but has she EVER studied where she lives? Our national history, what our nation is about and why? Obviously, the answer is, no, looks like she has assumed she’s too special to be bothered with all that “USA stuff”…”ready to rule,” she says about her/Obama’s use of our White House…

  She knows nothing about the United States of America. Nothing.