CommentsDisplaying Micki's 10 most recent comments.

• Hawking Says God Not Needed for Creation

  September 4, 2010 at 2:46am

  In reply to Bryant.

  See below comment by Micki

• Hawking Says God Not Needed for Creation

  September 4, 2010 at 2:45am

  In reply to Bryant.

  Not really you don’t get the last word ! by your logic you too are only a believer in your belief however you are guilty of the accusations that you toss at others. how are you assured that one side is not correct ? the logic for a creator – first mover – is solid, though we cannot prove the existence of yesterday even when we are sure of it doesn’t make it false. the idea of i think and therefor i am is the only proof you exist the rest could be an illusion does this mean you dont trust this proof ? logic and deduction is proof, baring tangible objects that is often all we have to go on .

• Hawking Says God Not Needed for Creation

  September 4, 2010 at 2:26am

  In reply to Everflame.

  You get it !!! why don’t some others ?

• Hawking Says God Not Needed for Creation

  September 4, 2010 at 2:21am

  In reply to limitfree.

  Aquinas did a good job of proof by reason …first mover …. deduction is often all a scientist has to start from , what must be is the moving force for proof which the thinker thinks then the scientist proves .

• Hawking Says God Not Needed for Creation

  September 4, 2010 at 2:10am

  In reply to Swobby.

  Pity the cripple dying man for he is scared and loosing his empowerment in all other ways . So he thrashes about as he still can. I don’t think he will find peace until after…

• Hawking Says God Not Needed for Creation

  September 4, 2010 at 2:04am

  In reply to Hondaman.

  But it does matter if we accept-believe in a higher being-law for it affects everything we do and why we do it …this has reaching and profound effects .when we give up our awe in the greatness we are reduced to the lesser ways of social relative man made manipulations.

• Hawking Says God Not Needed for Creation

  September 4, 2010 at 1:53am

  In reply to sullinsea.

  Good stuff… I don’t think there is any rush to go to a new world , If I were to guess, by the time we would need to go ,came, we will have solved this long ago. All Gore is an alarmist that used his cries for personal gain. That dirt-bag !

• Hawking Says God Not Needed for Creation

  September 4, 2010 at 1:39am

  Dr. H. would you care to explain how this spontaneous act could happen outside the laws of nature when no other acts follow this trend ? I would be more inclined to the concept of {always existence } than self generation without reason , Pondering the nature of always ,I can conceive of a loop in space-time were the past joins the future. However, we still do not escape the mystery of our self aware existence nor the mystery of the life force itself which lingers behind all theories . If in fact matter came into existence from the void this would declare our universe capable of a process of creation from nothing, not even itself. A magic or mysterious act generated from non-existence ? This is less logical than a creator who always is . The nature of a creator houses self-awareness , as the nature of its created, us. Deduction is proof and we rely on it ,as flawed as it can be. The power of reasoning is our best tool , it serves us by making sense of our guesses ,dreams and creative leaps. The best evidence for the existence of a self aware creator lies within our own brain-mind . Either I brought myself into existence or there is a director outside of me, Perhaps I always was and by contract have chosen to omit my full identity to myself. but then who are you ? or are you at all ? perhaps we are all our own creator and always was existing. Is this what you hope for Dr H ? My concern with your theory is the inevitable misuse of its implication for the less thinking people. One may conclude there is no reason to behave decently or in awe of life if there is no greater existence than the lesser one , no consequences to our actions.,no cosmic connection . For the advanced thinker this is an ongoing evolution of thought but for the formative youths mind there is obvious danger in the lack of connection of life and meaning. You are clearly a great thinker ,however I question your motive for such a theory and caution others to reason out its implications in context to the social -political weapon that would have us running lost and scared in need of a substitute leader.

• Hawking Says God Not Needed for Creation

  September 3, 2010 at 11:15pm

  In reply to Belle Hyde.

  science is not tool of beliefs , it is a tool of proof .