Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: nomark

Member Since: January 06, 2011

CommentsDisplaying nomark's 10 most recent comments.

  • This is how Leftist women think? What a bunch of tripe. What this ad infers is that women don’t really want sex. It imiplies that women (in particular lefty women) exchange their bodies to get something else they want. We have a word for this. Thus the lefties over at the Huffpo are saying women are nothing but hookers who trade their bodies to get what they desire. Maybe they desire a nice house and car, so they trade their bodies with a man who can provide that. And when that woman wants the man to act or believe differently all she has at her disposal to convince the man to see it her way is her body. They are saying there is no logical, intelligent, rational means by which a woman (at least a leftist woman) could change her husbands mind about something, OTHER than using her body.

    Who’s the “male chauvinistic pig” now?

  • Sex Strike Poster (Photo: Women.com)

    April 30, 2012 at 4:44am

    Really? This is how Leftist women think? What a bunch of tripe. What this ad infers is that women don’t really want sex. It imiplies that women (in particular lefty women) exchange their bodies to get something else they want. We have a word for this. Thus the lefties over at the Huffpo are saying women are nothing but hookers who trade their bodies to get what they desire. Maybe they desire a nice house and car, so they trade their bodies with a man who can provide that. And when that woman wants the man to act or believe differently all she has at her disposal to convince the man to see it her way is her body. They are saying there is no logical, intelligent, rational means by which a woman (at least a leftist woman) could change her husbands mind about something, OTHER than using her body.

    Who’s the “male chauvinistic pig” now?

  • Thank God my wife not a manipulative social misfit who resorts to using “sex as a weapon” to get her way. In our house I‘m happy when my wife is happy and she’s happy when I am happy. It just works out so much better that way. You’d think more people would want to try it.

    All I can say to any good conservative man who finds himself married to one of these narcissistic she-devils is two words: divorce attorney.

  • I can understand the no to sidearms due to port restrictions. But how about permanently mounted .50 BMGs on the deck of the ships No ammo till the captain gives it out and then blam. One magazine and no more pirates.

  • I guess the kid, his parents, the announcer and half the people here think the kid was entitled to the ball. The other half live in the real world where you don’t always win, you try harder next time, but most important, you don‘t give up and start feeling sorry for yourself because you didn’t get everything you wanted. When I was his age I was thrilled to get to go to a game. But I didn’t get seats within a pitches distance to the field. No I sat in the nose bleed section at Shea Stadium. And I was thrilled.

  • Also what do you think about this:

    No one pays income taxes until they are 30 years old. Anyone under 30 pays nothing. But we raise the age to vote to 30 as well. Basically you get to live free, but you don’t get to vote. When you turn 30, you start paying at a flat rate and you get to vote.

    The exception is those in the military. If you are willing to lay down your life for the country, then you get to vote. But you still don’t pay any taxes until you are 30 years old.

    I really think this idea along with a flat rate has great potentional to further personal and economic freedom in this country.

  • While I very much support most any plan as better than what we have now, the real problem is not being addressed. All the plans come to a number based on current spending. They have the total budget (well back when the Senate used to pass one) and then they say “how many people pay” and they get their number. That’s the wrong way to do it because it does nothing to shrink government. What we need to agree on is what should the final number be. I have always been fond of 10%. So we start at 18% and then each year we drop 1% until we get to 10%.

    From that point on, the government just has to live within that 10%. If we have a declared war,the rate goes to 20% for the duration of the war plus 3 years. Other than that, it’s 10% forever.

    And everyone pays the same amount. I don’t think anyone should have a free ride unless they are physically or mentally unable to work. Too many people living off too few people right now. Our culture is parasitic. This has to change.

  • Caption that photo!: Barack Obama

    April 18, 2012 at 2:58am

    If only I had a father…

  • I did not know you could get cash out of an ATM with an EBT. That’s nuts!

    At some point people who pay their taxes to fund this kind of garbage will say “enough.”

    But how much is enough? What more do we have to put up with?

    Personally I’m looking for “slash and burn” candidates who will go in and end ALL of these government give away problems. Let’s just end them all and start over. We can do a better job because we’ll have decades worth of experiences to keep the fraud out from the start.

    It’s got to be better than this.

    I say end them all, let people fend for themselves for a few years. Maybe they will appreciate a job. Any job. Unemployment will plummet too.

    It’s a Win/Win.

  • If Zim was there it would not have happened.