Impressive delusions of grandeur. Keep in mind, with what you just said, you just put out noise that makes you indistinguishable from Marxists: you announced an intention to hijack another party instead of standing on your own merits. That manner of conduct worries me, and I daresay worries a lot more on the R side of the equation.
One question: If the Libertarian cause is so great, why are there no local or state representatives of the Libertarian cause? Why are none of the states listed as Libertarian instead of D or R enclaves? Or is this deliberate strategy to attempt for only the top position (President)?
For the record, I hold nothing against Libertarians. Since I am not part of that group, I am trying to understand the operational strategies of the party.
Love the look of the lightning at a distance. Also goes to show you an interesting phenomenon about electricity: people think that electricity is a confined charge, when in reality that charge has a definable radius (as seen here) that increases in voltage (potential) as you get closer to the center of the discharge.
Always remember: when judging the piles, regardless of how lumpy or runny they may be, or what texture they have overall, you are still comparing one pile to another. ‘Nuff said.
Compromise is what built the nightmare we stand in today.
Quit being a wishy-washy sheeple and STAND FOR SOMETHING! Your choice damns us all to more decades of the same bullsj1t we have been suffering since the 70s.
When are you going to realize that even if YOU are aware, you‘ve already been boxed in and all you’re doing is railing against the inevitable?
I highly suggest you find a ENG translation of Sun Tzu’s Art Of War and bone up on it — big time. For all the noise Paulistas have made, you still allowed yourself to be outmaneuvered and trapped on indefensible terrain. We have no solution for victory at this time, simply because the oplan went in the wrong direction (see below).
LIBERTARIANS TAKE NOTE: Attempting to win the presidency by way of a top-level attempt won’t work. There is no cohesive ground-level support, which is the only way to get someone in office. If you want a Libertarian or a Constitutionalist in office, you’ll need to build the brand recognition from the local level up. Hijacking the Republicans is not going to get the job done, you’ll disenfranchise a goodly portion of the R base and achieve no result.
If you want the inevitable victory, build a proper local->state->national->presidential presence in that order. You’re not going to achieve the result you want in any other fashion. Look at the multiple party structures in Britain for an example, they have it done (mostly) right.
I agree mostly with your platform, but the overarching strategy has nuked your operating concept. A war is never won in a single stroke by one man. I respectfully suggest you take this lesson to heart.
When are you going to realize that even if YOU are awake, you‘ve already been boxed in and all you’re doing is railing against the inevitable?
I highly suggest you find a ENG translation of Sun Tzu’s Art Of War and bone up on it — big time. For all the noise you’ve made, you still allowed yourself to be outmaneuvered and trapped on indefensible terrain. We have no solution for victory at this time, simply because the oplan went in the wrong direction (see below).
LIBERTARIANS TAKE NOTE: Attempting to win the presidency by way of a single top-level attempt won’t work. There is no cohesive ground-level support, which is the only way to get someone in office. If you want a Libertarian or a Constitutionalist in office, you’ll need to build the brand recognition from the local level up. Hijacking the Republicans is not going to get the job done, you’ll disenfranchise a goodly portion of the R base and achieve no result.
If you want the inevitable victory, build a proper local->state->national->presidential presence in that order. You’re not going to achieve the result you want in any other fashion. Look at the multiple party structures in Britain for an example, they have it done (mostly) right.
I agree mostly with your platform, but the overarching strategy has nuked your operating concept. A war is never won in a single stroke by one man. I respectfully suggest you take this lesson to heart.
Oh yes, the government needs to ‘force’ lesser entities (cities) to do its bidding. Totalitarianism at its finest.
Whence was it determined that we young ones had to pay for the sins of the hippies and the degenerates that came before us? I have enough trouble of my own without paying for some superannuated 60‘s radical’s bullsj1t.
I’m guessing 35%, give or take 5%. Some of them may have a psychological compulsion to do so, the rest simply have their lips permanently attached to Obama/Soros/VanJones’ arses.
CNN Article: Republican Voters are ‘White, Aging and Dying Off,’ And the Party Could, Too
May 25, 2012 at 1:49pm
Impressive delusions of grandeur. Keep in mind, with what you just said, you just put out noise that makes you indistinguishable from Marxists: you announced an intention to hijack another party instead of standing on your own merits. That manner of conduct worries me, and I daresay worries a lot more on the R side of the equation.
One question: If the Libertarian cause is so great, why are there no local or state representatives of the Libertarian cause? Why are none of the states listed as Libertarian instead of D or R enclaves? Or is this deliberate strategy to attempt for only the top position (President)?
For the record, I hold nothing against Libertarians. Since I am not part of that group, I am trying to understand the operational strategies of the party.
New Time-Lapsed Vid: Here‘s What What It Looks Like When Meteors Slam Into Earth’s Atmosphere
May 25, 2012 at 12:57pm
Love the look of the lightning at a distance. Also goes to show you an interesting phenomenon about electricity: people think that electricity is a confined charge, when in reality that charge has a definable radius (as seen here) that increases in voltage (potential) as you get closer to the center of the discharge.
The Blaze’s Will Cain Calls Out Debbie Wasserman Schultz in Frustrating Interview…Again
May 25, 2012 at 12:53pm
Always remember: when judging the piles, regardless of how lumpy or runny they may be, or what texture they have overall, you are still comparing one pile to another. ‘Nuff said.
Where’s the…Beer? Cows Crash Party & End Up Drinking Guests’ Alcohol (Really)
May 25, 2012 at 12:48pm
Oh the drama…
We Finally Have a Document from Obama’s College Years — Sort Of
May 25, 2012 at 11:34am
Compromise is what built the nightmare we stand in today.
Quit being a wishy-washy sheeple and STAND FOR SOMETHING! Your choice damns us all to more decades of the same bullsj1t we have been suffering since the 70s.
Former GE CEO: Romney More Qualified to be President Than Someone Who Handed Out Leaflets as a Community Organizer
May 25, 2012 at 9:35am
We know what is happening.
When are you going to realize that even if YOU are aware, you‘ve already been boxed in and all you’re doing is railing against the inevitable?
I highly suggest you find a ENG translation of Sun Tzu’s Art Of War and bone up on it — big time. For all the noise Paulistas have made, you still allowed yourself to be outmaneuvered and trapped on indefensible terrain. We have no solution for victory at this time, simply because the oplan went in the wrong direction (see below).
LIBERTARIANS TAKE NOTE: Attempting to win the presidency by way of a top-level attempt won’t work. There is no cohesive ground-level support, which is the only way to get someone in office. If you want a Libertarian or a Constitutionalist in office, you’ll need to build the brand recognition from the local level up. Hijacking the Republicans is not going to get the job done, you’ll disenfranchise a goodly portion of the R base and achieve no result.
If you want the inevitable victory, build a proper local->state->national->presidential presence in that order. You’re not going to achieve the result you want in any other fashion. Look at the multiple party structures in Britain for an example, they have it done (mostly) right.
I agree mostly with your platform, but the overarching strategy has nuked your operating concept. A war is never won in a single stroke by one man. I respectfully suggest you take this lesson to heart.
Beck: Facebook’s Failure May Be Part of Government Plan to Control Internet
May 25, 2012 at 9:19am
We are awake.
When are you going to realize that even if YOU are awake, you‘ve already been boxed in and all you’re doing is railing against the inevitable?
I highly suggest you find a ENG translation of Sun Tzu’s Art Of War and bone up on it — big time. For all the noise you’ve made, you still allowed yourself to be outmaneuvered and trapped on indefensible terrain. We have no solution for victory at this time, simply because the oplan went in the wrong direction (see below).
LIBERTARIANS TAKE NOTE: Attempting to win the presidency by way of a single top-level attempt won’t work. There is no cohesive ground-level support, which is the only way to get someone in office. If you want a Libertarian or a Constitutionalist in office, you’ll need to build the brand recognition from the local level up. Hijacking the Republicans is not going to get the job done, you’ll disenfranchise a goodly portion of the R base and achieve no result.
If you want the inevitable victory, build a proper local->state->national->presidential presence in that order. You’re not going to achieve the result you want in any other fashion. Look at the multiple party structures in Britain for an example, they have it done (mostly) right.
I agree mostly with your platform, but the overarching strategy has nuked your operating concept. A war is never won in a single stroke by one man. I respectfully suggest you take this lesson to heart.
Bloomberg’s Solution For Ailing U.S. Cities: The Feds Should ‘Deliberately Force’ Them to Take Immigrants
May 23, 2012 at 11:47am
Oh yes, the government needs to ‘force’ lesser entities (cities) to do its bidding. Totalitarianism at its finest.
Whence was it determined that we young ones had to pay for the sins of the hippies and the degenerates that came before us? I have enough trouble of my own without paying for some superannuated 60‘s radical’s bullsj1t.
See MRCTV‘s Hilarious Interaction With NOW Protesters Rallying Against Limbaugh’s ‘Hate Speech’
May 22, 2012 at 3:25pm
@ I’m Awake Now
That which has been seen, cannot be unseen. I think I shall not e’en try, lest it destroy my mind with the utter horror!
NY Times Forced to Correct Error-Riddled ‘Wall Street Psychopaths’ Op-Ed
May 22, 2012 at 3:14pm
I’m guessing 35%, give or take 5%. Some of them may have a psychological compulsion to do so, the rest simply have their lips permanently attached to Obama/Soros/VanJones’ arses.