Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: OIF3survivor

Member Since: May 20, 2011

CommentsDisplaying OIF3survivor's 10 most recent comments.

  • @beckisdelusional:

    We’re so doomed huh?
    That’s kind of funny that you represent a group that has no problem with murdering babies via abortion. While you are doing that, families of five and more are the norm in a significant portion of those of us leaning right. This might be the one time that I’d agree with the theory of natural selection, as children trend towards voting the same as their parents. Thus, those sharing your ideology are happily, as a group, going to represent a smaller and smaller demographic over time.

    Have a great day and enjoy the rest of your trolling!

  • @enci!
    “igornace” huh?

    Great to see your fantastic vocabulary and grammar, not to mention hypocrisy back!

    Just out of curiosity, I still haven‘t seen that retraction of your guarantee of the ’insider information’ that would completely vindicate Weiner…hmmm. You know all you have to do is admit that you were either wrong or telling a deliberate falsehood and I’ll leave you alone on that issue.
    The reality however, is like most reflexive ideologues, you’ll likely go to your grave without admitting wrongdoing.

  • @encinumb:
    1) “Weiner was man enough to admit fault”…wow. To quote you yet again, what are you smoking and where can I get some. The male(can’t dignify him by calling him a man) admitted he had done wrong and stepped down in disgrace only after the PHYSICAL evidence against him had grown to avalanche proportions. The timeline is there as is the historical record. Which brings me to
    2) All we have at this point against Cain are claims of women, at least one of which with an unsavory background. You intimated a hypocritical mindset in those who support Cain, in your argument to meand yet you demonstrate an ideological hypocracy of your own in not applying the same standards of evidence in assuming Cain’s guilt. In other words, you were still claiming knowledge of insider information (pathetic attempt) that would clear Weiner’s name not only after the physical evidence had been found, but even AFTER Weiner himself had admitted guilt. On the other hand, as I mentioned earlier you’ve made up your mind and are willling to bash an opponent of a differing ideology on the basis of claims.
    This in itself indicates a pattern of behavior with you. You are indeed an ideologue with little or no ability to think critically or debate effectively; only make hit-and-run claims on a website. In short, you make those on your side look pathetic by your association, if you are representative of the left’s mindset and inability to argue effectively.

  • @encinumb:
    1) “Weiner was man enough to admit fault”…wow. To quote you yet again, what are you smoking and where can I get some. The male(can’t dignify him by calling him a man) admitted he had done wrong and stepped down in disgrace only after the PHYSICAL evidence against him had grown to avalanche proportions. The timeline is there as is the historical record. Which brings me to
    2) All we have at this point against Cain are claims of women, at least one of which with an unsavory background. You intimated a hypocritical mindset in those who support Cain, in your argument to meand yet you demonstrate an ideological hypocracy of your own in not applying the same standards of evidence in assuming Cain’s guilt. In other words, you were still claiming knowledge of insider information (pathetic attempt) that would clear Weiner’s name not only after the physical evidence had been found, but even AFTER Weiner himself had admitted guilt. On the other hand, as I mentioned earlier you’ve made up your mind and are willling to bash an opponent of a differing ideology on the basis of ONLY claims with NO physical evidence to this point.
    This in itself indicates a pattern of behavior with you. You are indeed an ideologue with little or no ability to think critically or debate effectively; only make hit-and-run claims on a website. In shot you make those on your side look pathetic by your association, if you are representative of the left’s mindset and inability to argue effec

  • @encinumb:
    Waiting to hear your ever-so-honest proof vindicating Wiener of similar claims that you so vehemently argued existed. You said 48 hours…how many months ago was that now?

  • @encinumb:
    Hey, I was wondering when you’d troll on by. Speaking of sexual scandals(actual ones that is), whatever happened to that evidence you said was going to surface in48 hours vindicating your hero Wiener, oh about several months ago? You ready to act like a grown up yet and admit you were seriously wrong on that?

  • Some of the comments are bordering on idiocy here. These immigrants are not described as illegals and judging from where they came, I‘d bet money that they’ve mostly come here legally. Although. The writer brings up some fair contrasts between our country and China, it should certainly raise some concern that a not inconsiderable number of legal immigrants would rather go back.

  • This story is of course disgusting but I can say from my own experience running gun truck (convoy security) missions around Baghdad that its in no way shocking. I might even have pics still from skeletal looking cows grazing in similar looking conditions along the main north-south MSR (highway) along the west of the city. Of course in that instance I don‘t think that it was necessarily a designated landfill so much as most of the western side of Baghdad just resembled a massive rotting garbage pile back in ’05.

  • @encinom:
    Speaking of nuanced (absurdity), what ever happened to your inside info on Weiner’s innocence? Kind of evaporated huh…like the socialist-in-chief’s approval ratings.

  • I find it ironic that a person of her “stature” should refer so frequently eating I.e., “sandwiches” and “meals” in one interview. What was she really thinking of…