CommentsDisplaying PAFFVINTAGE's 10 most recent comments.

• Media Shows No Signs of Understanding the Ron Paul Strategy So Let Me Explain it

  May 10, 2012 at 2:18pm

  In reply to altannt.

  He has done a million times more at his job and every one else’s for the past 30 years. That’s why we are there now to help him out. And if anything ever happened to him, don’t think this movement will stop. We’re done and if it takes 20 or 30 years to educate our American brothers and sisters, then so be it. We will accept nothing more than freedom. These greedy no-good disloyal lying falsely-named “leaders” need to go.

• Media Shows No Signs of Understanding the Ron Paul Strategy So Let Me Explain it

  May 10, 2012 at 2:07pm

  In reply to ademas.

  Ademas, He’ll get the money. Right now, he doesn’t even get money from big banks like Obama and Romney does but he knows how to budget what he does get from millions of small donors. That’s a great quality to have in the economic atmosphere we currently are in. If he became the nominee, it would simply be his voting record vs. Obama’s. When you have someone as knowledgeable as Paul is on the economy, history, and military, how in the world can Obama compete? If Americans had been given the chance to really hear Paul speak his mind (other than 5 minute debate soundbites), they‘d be more aware of what’s going on. I have heard more and more interviews since the 2008 election ended. More people started doing their own research to understand why he believes as he does. The truth is very frightening but I’d rather know the truth. It’s like going into a hospital and the doctor finds you you have terminal cancer but he then says, oh, it’s just heartburn. Go home and take some antacid. You’ll be ok. I learned the truth over 4 years ago and have already gotten past the shock stage. I‘m with the numerous Paul supporters in taking our country back because we know many Americans don’t understand yet. It‘s hard to keep moving ahead when our American family tries to fight us when we know without a doubt what’s going on. This is not like hiding an alcoholic’s bottle of wine; this is about picking him up off the floor & taking him to the emergency room because he has stopped br

• Ron Paul: Supporting Santorum ‘Means Rejecting the Tea Party’

  March 8, 2012 at 10:02am

  In reply to deac0n.

  RJL, You obviously don‘t know what you’re talking about. The more you talk, the more you show your ignorance.

• Ron Paul: Supporting Santorum ‘Means Rejecting the Tea Party’

  March 8, 2012 at 9:57am

  In reply to Lastdaysgirl.

  FEMA is not Constitutional. Just like the NEA isn’t Constitutional. The National Endowment for Arts got $121 million in 2006, private donations got $2.5 billion. We‘d be just fine without the NEA and we’d be just fine without FEMA. Dr. Paul gets complaints from his coastal district about FEMA quite often. It is much harder for a big govt. entity such as FEMA to be able to “fix” problems locally. That’s why Katrina ended up as bad as it did. The locals were expecting too much from a federal bureaucracy and anyway, it’s not Constitutional. The locals could’ve done more such as making use of the many buses that ended up getting flooded. They weren’t prepared for the masses at the Silverdome either. The people there always knew that if they got a direct hit from a hurricane, it would be disastrous. The local govt. should’ve been more forceful in telling them to take responsibility for themselves; do not sit around and wait for Washington.

  As far as Santorum being so consistent, well I will say this…he consistently voted to raise the debt ceiling 5 times! With our dollar being worth less than 5 cents of it’s original worth since the beginning of the Federal Reserve, I can say he’s consistently on the path of economic distruction! With his undying support of war and spend spend spend, he’ll go down in history as one of those who helped destroy the United States economy. And if someone professes to be pro-life (which I’m not even sure I believe that), then why is

• More ‘Embarrassing’ Ron Paul Newsletters Emerge on Race, Israel, & More

  January 18, 2012 at 10:43am

  In reply to PAFFVINTAGE.

  terms). They knew he wasn’t a racist/anti-semite. Dr. Paul’s two favorite economists are Ludwig von Mises and Murray Rothbard (both Jewish!). You people are grasping at straws. The weekend all of you were revealed to us (right after the Ames Straw Poll, Jon Stewart’s “Cornpolled” episode), it was truly a miracle. It was like all of a sudden, the guilty media glowed in the dark for all to see. The more you lie, the more we ignore you.

• More ‘Embarrassing’ Ron Paul Newsletters Emerge on Race, Israel, & More

  January 18, 2012 at 10:42am

  The light has been shown on all the media that are trying to manipulate who we choose as our leaders and the Blaze is no different. Dr. Paul had left Congress in 1985 to go back to his practice as a full-time ob/gyn. Heard an interview by his brother, Wayne Paul, who said back then, Dr. Paul would deliver like 350 babies a year (that’s almost everyday!). With no computers in every home, no internet…….the newspapers, radio, tv (they were our internet, a lot slower, and could be slanted anyway the media wanted). Dr. Paul was BUSY doing what was best, taking care of women of ALL RACES (oftentimes giving free care to those who could not afford it). We see how badly the establishment wants Dr. Paul gone. I can easily see how someone would write that stuff to hurt him 20 years ago. Sadly, it would’ve taken only one of those newsletters to cause damage. The first 12 years the newsletters were out, there wasn’t a single piece of questionable content. 12 years!! It started 3 years after Dr. Paul had gone back to Texas to be a doctor again. And out of a minimum of 240 issues, there were about 10 in question. Once they stopped, there was an 18 month lapse before the one came out on the L.A. riots and the author was a James B. Powell who now writes for Forbes magazine. Should he take responsibility for what went out under his name? Of course. And he did. Over and over. He took responsibility in 1996 when he ran for Congress again and his district chose him anyway (for several term

• More ‘Embarrassing’ Ron Paul Newsletters Emerge on Race, Israel, & More

  January 18, 2012 at 10:35am

  I agree. The light has been shown on all the media that are trying to manipulate who we choose as our leaders and the Blaze is no different. Dr. Paul had left Congress in 1985 to go back to his practice as a full-time ob/gyn. Heard an interview by his brother, Wayne Paul, who said back then, Dr. Paul would deliver like 350 babies a year (that’s almost everyday!). With no computers in every home, no internet…….the newspapers, radio, tv (they were our internet, a lot slower, and could be slanted anyway the media wanted). Dr. Paul was BUSY doing what was best, taking care of women of ALL RACES (oftentimes giving free care to those who could not afford it). We see how badly the establishment wants Dr. Paul gone. I can easily see how someone would write that stuff to hurt him 20 years ago. Sadly, it would’ve taken only one of those newsletters to cause damage. The first 12 years the newsletters were out, there wasn’t a single piece of questionable content. 12 years!! It started 3 years after Dr. Paul had gone back to Texas to be a doctor again. And out of a minimum of 240 issues, there were about 10 in question. Once they stopped, there was an 18 month lapse before the one came out on the L.A. riots and the author was a James B. Powell who now writes for Forbes magazine. Should he take responsibility for what went out under his name? Of course. And he did. Over and over. He took responsibility in 1996 when he ran for Congress again and his district chose him anyway (for sev

• Ex-Aide to Ron Paul Makes Stunning Claims About Old Boss: Anti-Israel, 9/11 Truther, Doesn’t Believe U.S. Had Any Business Fighting Hitler

  December 28, 2011 at 4:12pm

  In reply to DrFrost.

  At one time, I thought Paul’s foreign policy was not correct either. But there is a video on you tube that has veterans explaining in detail why Paul‘s foreign policy makes the most sense and since we know that the active military is giving more to Paul’s campaign than all the other candidates combined, I wanted to know why. The video is called “You Like Ron Paul, Except on Foreign Policy”. The veterans ask us to really listen to them rather than support them with ribbons or other similar ways.

• Ex-Aide to Ron Paul Makes Stunning Claims About Old Boss: Anti-Israel, 9/11 Truther, Doesn’t Believe U.S. Had Any Business Fighting Hitler

  December 28, 2011 at 4:07pm

  There is an interesting article on Lewrockwell.com Tues, Dec. 27 about what a Paul presidency might’ve done for the U.S. during WWI and WWII. If the U.S. had not entered WWI, Hitler might never have risen to power because the Treaty of Versailles might never have been written. It was a punitive treaty imposed upon the losers which lead to German hyperinflation in 1923. The German people would follow just about anyone after that. Then if Paul had not entered WWI, it wouldn‘t have to go to war against Germany for WWII because there would’ve possibly been no Adolph Hitler and Nazis. 50 million people might not have perished (of course all this is speculative). A President Paul also would not have put an oil embargo on Japan and there would never have been an attack on Pearl Harbor. But since Congress declared war on Germany, Pres. Paul would‘ve supported because it’s Constitutional. Paul isn’t against war necessarily, he’s against undeclared wars. He acts in a proper Cosntitutional manner. Dr. Paul is an Air Force veteran and served our country in a military capacity. And the active military has donated more to his campaign than to all other candidates combined (including Obama). But as far as this article, no it’s not a definite but it is an interesting read. It’s titled “Ron Paul as a Stooge for Adolph Hitler”.

• Was a 5th Grader Kicked Out of His Elementary School for Saying a Local Newscaster Resembles Barack Obama?

  November 19, 2011 at 7:30pm

  In reply to Diablo4965.

  DRATTASTIC says, “Since when did being racist ( which this is clearly and laughably NOT ) become illegal . There are plenty of openly racist Blacks ,Latinos ,Asians etc…but somehow if you have white skin you are now singled out for even the smallest and even innocent things .”……………….Tell me about it! I used to be part of a local city history profile on Facebook. Last time I went to look, there were no posts about history but a massive tirade of racist (black on white) posts. I couldn’t believe it & had no idea why. Every racist hate thing you could think of was posted (and not just one individual was doing it). How about send a counseler to their houses to tell them how evil it is! I left no comments, rather thought it was wiser to leave the group. Nowadays, you‘d have to worry about someone getting your name and burning your house down because they assume you’re racist. And even if someone were racist, in a free society they’d have the right to be. See, we have double standards now. Seems blacks can be as freely racist as they like but a white cannot. They can say what they want with little done about it. They can have black tv channels, black pageants, black this/that but if a hint of a white beauty pageant or anything like that were to show up, there’d be rioting in the streets. It’s ridiculous. We are individuals and the powers-that-be have successfully allowed some to collectively go after others for the least little thing. Putting people in groups