Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: PATRIOTMAMA

Member Since: September 03, 2010

CommentsDisplaying PATRIOTMAMA's 10 most recent comments.

  • Great. Another celebrity thinking again. First of all, who’s talking about Planned Parenthood? Am I missing something? I thought the whole bruhaha was about Catholics trying to not have to pay for contraceptives since they don’t believe in it. Is there a lot of talk about defunding Planned Parenthood again? I’m pretty sure that movement is about abortion not about contraception. Oh and to any libs that are here on this site, abortion and contraception AREN’T actually the same thing btw. In case, like most of your piers, you didn’t know that. I’m lost as to why “access to reproductive health” is the line on this one. Unless of course this is just another blatant case of the Libs/Dems trying to distract and move the argument when they don’t have anything to stand on. Disgusting.

  • @KADSTER01

    I’m not paranoid. I’m actually looking forward to this world being cleaned of the evil that exists in this broken world. It’s not paranoia when we see it foretold in the bible. You can choose not to believe it but don’t call it paranoia please. When you die and find out we’re wrong, then and only then when you can prove it should you call it paranoia.

  • Ya that would make it easier for Satan to put the “Mark of the Beast” on everyone. Ya sure, no problem. People better get right with God. This stuff is starting to be floated around and was practiced before in Nazi Germany. Can anyone say “test run?” CREEPY!!!

  • @RJA444

    I think that is what makes all of us so damn angry. It isn’t so much that Larry Flint did this. We’ve come to expect trash like that from that souless pig. However, after raising such an ENORMOUS stink about Rush using SATIRE (yes folks it was satire and a hypothetical evaluation of her own testimony I was actually listening when he said it) to call her a slut; then we hear nothing but cricketts when this pig uses an actual picture to put a d”#k in her mouth. HYPOCRISY in the highest. You can‘t pick and choose which women get your defense if you’re using the general term “war on women.” Let’s hear your outrage on this, which goes a hell of a lot further than calling her a slut btw!!! Oh, no, that‘s right it’s only Liberal women you care about…and…only when it benefits you politically. Talk about WAR ON WOMEN……Oooops no it’s WAR ON CONSERVATIVE WOMEN!!!!! We must be making a difference huh?!!!!

  • Ya Larry could sell I whole lot of magazines if he used M.Obama in the same light. Let’s have a bipartisan series with Pelosi, Fluke, Obama, Wasserman-Schultz, Palin, etc. in the same way. Oh that’s right. He won’t because no one wants to see the Dem/Lib hags on the left in any sexual way. Including their own men. Listen, Cupp take this as a compliment honey. I KNOW it’s completely beyond wrong, but, we have all the hotties on the right, currently and they can’t stand it. That‘s why they’re going after you in the first place. They can’t handle women with brains and beauty and the confidence that we have. It screws with their brains completely. Keep you head up and keep doing what you’re doing. This also shows just how much you’re getting to them. Way to go girl!!! Flint, you sir are a disgusting pig and have always been. GET A LIFE!!!

  • Well now, if you can’t get real ratings, refer to your “Rules for Radicals” handbook and manufacture them with over-sampled studies that portray your side as being smart and “well-informed.” Man I’m more hopefull now cuz it is more and more obvious that the Libs/Dems are terrified if they need things like this to make themselves feel better. I knew all of those damn answers. They had to be asking the only people that respond to these polls and studies which are usually Libs because, like me, the conservatives are all out there busting our arses off at WORK!!!

  • @BSDETECTOR

    One of the best comments yet. I totally agree. If the media was giving him credit for what he‘s truly accomplished without a political agenda guiding their opinions and coverage then we wouldn’t even have a question who would be the next President. It would be hands-down Romney. Ya, Letterman let’s give credit where credit is WELL OVERDUE!!!!

  • I can’t stand this idiot. I don’t know what he believes personally as only God can see into the heart of men. HOWEVER, don’t you DARE tell me what it means to be a Christian or that “it’s not a very Christian thing to do.” Don’t you dare!!! The bible tells me what is Christian and what isn’t. This isn’t about CHRISTIANITY MARTIN!!!! This is about the Constitution of the US and this administration daring to step in and tell the church what they have to pay for if they want to employ people. THIS ISN‘T ABOUT WHAT IS CHRISTIAN AND WHAT ISN’T. Ugghh!!! I can’t even stomach the whole article.

  • @ LGCCAC

    Totally!!! I was noticing that as well. It just goes to speak about the legitimacy of Zimmerman’s case. They‘re like sharks unless they smell the blood in the water they’re not interested. It’s disgusting and MLKjr is rolling in his grave at the embarrassment that these once civil rights leaders have made of what he started. I greatly respect MLKjr and his cause. They however have just exploited it for their own political and financial gain. Just like with most Libs/Dems they practice transference (accuse others of the things they do most themselves.) They should be screaming in the mirror.

  • Look either way you cut it, there is more than enough from recorded testimony at the time for the defense to prove reasonable doubt as to what really happened. Now, just as with the Casey Anthony case, even if Zimmerman did committ second degree murder (which I don’t really believe he did. I’m more inclined to believe that people are falling victim to intimidation and witness bias esp with a young mother probably afraid for her family than I am that Martin was killed because of racial biogtry or some over zealous wanna-be cop.) But any way you slice it the defense has more than enough holes in their testimony to open the door to reasonable doubt and the prosecution, so far, doesn’t have near enough concrete evidence to dispell that. As long as the defense lawyer is worth his salt I believe this will end in a not guilty verdict, in my humble opinion.