CommentsDisplaying pgson's 10 most recent comments.

• Fake Explicit Image of S.E. Cupp Appears in Hustler (Graphic)

  May 23, 2012 at 2:29pm

  First of all, what can you expect from a rag magazine that lives off of this stuff? Second, Sarah Palin has had pornos made with a woman impersonating her in them, so this is not worse than how she’s been treated. Third, Hustler, unfortunately, has been doing this kind of stuff for years. They’ve had male conservatives — I remember seeing a picture of Bush and some Senator over the years — with phalises in their ears, or worse. No-one made any fuss over it then and that’s the point. This shouldn’t be allowed. It’s NOT political satire (to the person who had the gall to suggest such), and they should be sued over such slanderous, deformation of character photography manipulation. However, it’s been allowed to happen and will probably not be stopped now. Looks like they redacted the photo, since S.E. Cupp spoke out about it, so she’s showing that this can be stopped, if people speak out.

  That‘s the only way it’s ever going to end — the left bias and horrible people getting away with unimaginable things under the auspices of free speech and satire — is if people stand up and vote with their voice and with their feet and wallets. The grotesque media, like MSNBC, NY Times, Media Matters, will all die away if people get fed up enough. Rags like this, too.

• Fake Explicit Image of S.E. Cupp Appears in Hustler (Graphic)

  May 23, 2012 at 2:28pm

  In reply to Kafir-Islamsux.

  First of all, what can you expect from a rag magazine that lives off of this stuff? Second, Sarah Palin has had pornos made with a woman impersonating her in them, so this is not worse than how she’s been treated. Third, Hustler, unfortunately, has been doing this kind of stuff for years. They’ve had male conservatives — I remember seeing a picture of Bush and some Senator over the years — with phalluses in their ears, or worse. No-one made any fuss over it then and that’s the point. This shouldn’t be allowed. It’s NOT political satire (to the person who had the gall to suggest such), and they should be sued over such slanderous, deformation of character photography manipulation. However, it’s been allowed to happen and will probably not be stopped now. Looks like they redacted the photo, since S.E. Cupp spoke out about it, so she’s showing that this can be stopped, if people speak out.

  That‘s the only way it’s ever going to end — the left bias and horrible people getting away with unimaginable things under the auspices of free speech and satire — is if people stand up and vote with their voice and with their feet and wallets. The grotesque media, like MSNBC, NY Times, Media Matters, will all die away if people get fed up enough. Rags like this, too.

• Yikes: Scorned Dentist Pulls Out ALL of Ex-Boyfriend’s Teeth

  April 29, 2012 at 1:39pm

  I must say I’m very angry and disappointed at a lot of the reactions here, laughing at this grotesque mutilation. Have we sunk this low? Your parents and certainly your parents’ parents would never have laughed at a man being mutilated by his ex, no matter the reason. You think about having all of your own teeth torn out of your face and what that would do to you not just physically, but psychologically, and you tell me how funny it is…

  This is disgraceful.

• ‘You Haven’t Even Thought This Out’: O‘Reilly Confronts ’Drop the I-Word‘ Spokeswoman in Sizzling ’Factor’ Segment

  April 28, 2012 at 6:23pm

  **note: I really wish this comment section here would get fixed. The only way ever my comments show is if I make them seperately from replying to anyone. I don‘t know if it’s just Google Chrome is the problem for you guys, or what, but it’s a pretty annoying thing to never see the comment get posted.

  @ARAGONA Actually, even if all ilegal aliens were latino in origin, it still could never, ever be considered a racist slur, for this reason: the world ilegal is being used as an adjective to describe their actions, which are ilegal — agains the law — in origin. The word alien is the only term that could be viewed here as a racial term, as it‘s the noun that’s describing who and what they are. You can substitute immigrant also here.

  So, unless we change the English language and how it works, where adjectives describing people’s actions are now made to be the same as nouns describing who they are, or unless we are crazy enough to change a noun like alien, or immigrant — terms that obviously encompass any foreign person that migrates here to live — then the left and their idiocy has 0 legs to stand on.

  Unless you talk to their mindless drone sheep that follow them, of course. Or, they try and institute the entire term as a slang term that’s used as a noun, like “wet-back” became. Let them see how far they can get with an already established legal description of a person breaking the law being suddenly now only a slang term for ethnicity.

• ‘You Haven’t Even Thought This Out’: O‘Reilly Confronts ’Drop the I-Word‘ Spokeswoman in Sizzling ’Factor’ Segment

  April 28, 2012 at 6:20pm

  In reply to RightPolitically.

  @ARAGONA Actually, even if all ilegal aliens were latino in origin, it still could never, ever be considered a racist slur, for this reason: the world ilegal is being used as an adjective to describe their actions, which are ilegal — agains the law — in origin. The word alien is the only term that could be viewed here as a racial term, as it‘s the noun that’s describing who and what they are. You can substitute immigrant also here.

  So, unless we change the English language and how it works, where adjectives describing people’s actions are now made to be the same as nouns describing who they are, or unless we are crazy enough to change a noun like alien, or immigrant — terms that obviously encompass any foreign person that migrates here to live — then the left and their idiocy has 0 legs to stand on.

  Unless you talk to their mindless drone sheep that follow them, of course. Or, they try and institute the entire term as a slang term that’s used as a noun, like “wet-back” became. Let them see how far they can get with an already established legal description of a person breaking the law being suddenly now only a slang term for ethnicity…

• Hannity Panel Explodes Over Discussion of President‘s Economic ’Successes’

  April 20, 2012 at 3:16pm

  In reply to nappy.

  And you’re wrong. It doesn’t matter if you say it twice.

  lol, you should call them on their lies more often, Sean. He does, but sometimes he’ll let them get away with a blatant lie, or with talking over the other panelist. This time, he actually did his job as a moderator and stopped Tamara from her Alinsky tactic of talking over and dismissing the other side with Michelle (only after Michelle made it obvious that she wanted her fair turn, though), and he stopped Tamara when she told a blatant lie multiple times, instead of letting her run with it. Of course, if they always shut up the left’s side whenever they started lying, or cutting people off and ridiculing them, there would never be a real word uttered from the left on Fox…

• Scientists Resurrect 30,000-Year-Old Plant Using Genetic Material From Frozen Tissues Found in Siberia

  February 21, 2012 at 3:09pm

  Yeah, look out. Here comes Jurassic Park :p At best, or some type of ancient super virus, as worst.

  Hopefully not, but these people had better be careful. This is really potentially dangerous meddling that they’re doing.

• Memo: Top DOJ Officials Had Extensive Knowledge of Fast & Furious

  February 2, 2012 at 12:37pm

  In reply to pgson.

  Unless that section means something that’s falling under the radar of the mainstream press, but not for here.

  Anyway, watching Holder and his cronies lie about their plot to degrade/remove out second amendment rights by intentionally arming drug lords in Mexico, knowing the death and carnage that would bring … is enough to enrage. Holder and his men all need to be put in jail for first degree (premeditated) murder, fraud, treason, and a host of other charges, not just fired. We can’t even get them first, for God’s sake…

• Memo: Top DOJ Officials Had Extensive Knowledge of Fast & Furious

  February 2, 2012 at 12:33pm

  Why was this listed in “Below the Fold” in the newsletter? This is pretty damn important, so labeling it as something not worthy of the top headlines out there is flat-out wrong.

• AP FACT CHECK: Obama Pushes Plans That Flopped Before

  January 25, 2012 at 3:26am

  In reply to imsteph.

  Tell ‘em, Billy! heh Eh, if only it was a joke.