Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: Rainman3769

Rainman3769

Member Since: December 15, 2011

CommentsDisplaying Rainman3769's 10 most recent comments.

  • Yeah. . . they absolutly do have the same rights as men, they can go BUY condoms like we do. Then show their CONTROL and make their sexual partners use them. Simple. No government regulation or involvement need apply.

  • Hitler knew he was doing evil? Admittedly there is no way to be sure but the sad thing is he probably did not think he was. No one is the villian in their own story. He was killing Jews yes, but not attacking religion as a whole. He celebrated christmas and observed other christian holidays, same as the men in his armies. I cannot say for sure but I have read some things about him and his belief in the occult. Either way, no evidence that he was an atheist.

  • I had a moment of weakness, my apologies for the insanity comment.

  • . . . . HAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Wow man, Im starting to see what Moderationisbest is saying about people reading his stuff and then claiming the opposite. I will admit I made what could be considered a personal attack ONCE in the second page of comments.

    I think I know everything? If you REALLY read my posts you would see that more than once I say quite clearly that I dont discount the possibility I could be wrong, I just don’t think I am. I also say, as a matter of opinion and without malice (unless first provoked) that I think believers should also acknowlage THEY could be wrong, which they rarely do, and I think they are.

    Where are these cowardly threats that I supposedly made from the safety of the internet? Find them, copy and paste them in a response to me here.

    You did not make me mad, more exasperated and confused. I just cant imagine you REALLY believe atheists do LITERALLY nothing but fight the faith. And yes, that is what you said, because that is what “Every waking minute of every day,” means. I feel no compulsion to “prove” anything, because the whole god thing cannot be “proven” for either side.

    As for my screenname? When I was 14 i thought the two words, rain, and man, sounded cool when put together. I had never heard of the movie in my life at that time, and it just stuck as the years went on and I needed a moniker. No underlying meaning, no need for further thought.

    As for torment, well, I wouldnt go so far as to call

  • So if i hear voices in my head that’s proof they are real? I seem to recall a clinical term for people like that, insane.

  • @Jewish Avenger

    Lol. . . . I can see you are one of those types who has nothing worthwhile to add to a conversation that requires THOUGHT, people like you are important. When the grown-ups are having a bad day, we look at you, and immediatly feel better about ourselves. thanks for that.

  • I dont think it really makes your point more valid, just shows that both of us can point to “definitions,” and say we are right, maybe we both are, or maybe neither. All religions, be they ones with god, or some of the freakshow ones that dont have a god, all venerate and worship a being, person, or idea, and all have answers for what happens to you after you die. Atheists do not do that. And the one thing all religions right now have in common, its that they lasted beyond their cult status. So naturally this ONE atheist who wrote the article might think its a good idea to copy, so atheism can spread and endure. its not hypocracy, its just common sense on how to spread a message.

    See, if there is no diety, I just fail to see how that equates to a religion instead of simply a belief system. Because one can certainly have a belief system on how to live one’s life and not have any god in the equation. You call it religion after that, Im gonna have to call it BS.

  • I didnt mean for “cling” to be a negative, more as something important to not be let go of. if you took it as a negative, I think that says something about you.

    What are these simple questions? I’m not going anywhere for awhile, I woud like to tackle them.

  • @ Bad-Ashe

    ANOTHER one of websters definitions of religion is “a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, ESPECIALLY WHEN CONSIDERED AS THE CREATION OF A SUPERHUMAN AGENCY OR AGENCIES, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.”\

    rather then get bogged down with you over what religion IS, I will just say looks like we are gonna have to agree to disagree on that point. To me it makes sense that defining religion requires a diety of some kind, no diety, not a religion in my mind.

    @MOD

    Ah I see. I’ve noticed alot of his other comments kind of ring of the same lackluster mentality, I will join you in this stance of ignoring him. Kudos to you for telling me to take it easy on him, very kind.

  • @Dan-O

    I never made any claim remotely resembling your statement, nor would I ever. Anyone who says they have it all figured out is a fool, religious or not. There are far too many things that remain unexplained from a religious or atheistic standpoint for anyone to say they already know all the answers.

    About you I would say “Don’t bother trying to debate with THAT believer, he’s too condesending to intellectually debate something and admit the chance he might be wrong.”