New Contributor Column: Media Research Center Head Brent Bozell on “SHAMELESS BIAS BY OMISSION”

User Profile: RIGEL_ORION

Member Since: September 15, 2011

CommentsDisplaying RIGEL_ORION's 10 most recent comments.

  • Come on man, cut them some slack. It was a great idea for a con and they almost pulled it off.

    They’d successfully convinced millions of people that the very thing they breath out every day was toxic to the planet. What better way than CO2 for a tyrant beauracracy to assert the absolute right to control every aspect of everyone’s life… for the common good. It’s funny how all the most bloody, dark moments in human history seem to come back to that thought.

  • I think you misjudge Gore. He has no intention of helping the poor nations. The whole thing is simply a ruse to transfer the wealth and power of the rich nations to those of his ilk. The African nations are simply being exploited once again.

  • It‘s amazing that its taken this type of money and research to prove something that’s been common sense to anyone without a stake in the Church of Climate Change.

    Long before the industrial revolution, the earth went through many, many cycles of warming and cooling. Based on the yin and yang nature of these cycles, one could theorize that this constant change is normal, necessary and regulated by natural mechanisms so massively complex, powerful and unyielding as to be completely oblivious to the activities and ego of man.

    Unfortunately, much of climate science was co-opted years ago by the new fascists of the 21st Century – men who still seek to rule the world, only now under the guise of protecting it.

  • The most amazing thing about this study is that it was actually able to break through the climate change cabal to see the light of day. Studies presenting evidence contrary to the theory of man-made climate change must meet a much higher standard for publishing let alone critical acclaim. The intense scrutiny having the intended effect of discouraging research into areas that don‘t fit the ’climate change consensus’

  • The only thing this event does is put a giant pin in the whole ‘logic and reason’ argument that Atheists continually trot out to prove that their non-belief is correct.

    If a group of ‘free thinkers’ is unable to recognize that the only forms of religious bigotry being perpetrated are from their own actions, then they do not have the mental capabilities to work as a road kill remover on that highway, let alone determine the presence of a higher power.

    If there ever was a case for Christians photographing and IDing people for the purposes of calling them out, boycotting their places of business and standing up to the faces of religious intolerance, this is it. This group isn’t promoting religious liberty. They are attacking it. The only religion that is acceptable to these people is none – they’ve managed to instate Atheism as the official religion of the U.S Government and they are using the power to attack every other religion.

  • Bernbart has a great suggestion. Raise taxes on oil. That always has the effect of bringing down prices. Tax something and you get more of it. Oil prices are based on speculation of the supply of oil in the future. When you have a President bent on eliminating future supply, you get higher prices.

    The future shows Obama reducing drilling even more on public lands, setting his EPA out to disrupt drilling and fracking on private lands and demonizing drilling companies so he can raise taxes and eliminate more of it. Combine that with his intelligent policy of avoiding war through weakness a la Neville Chamberlain, and you can lay high gas prices through the futures market at his feet.

  • No, that’s not it. This was obviously orchestrated by someone. Government doesn’t work that fast spontaneously – especially on a Friday. I’d demand a clarification of the discrepancy in code enforcement for 30 years, the reason why the code official was there so quickly and a legitimate reason why a flag can’t be flown in this location.

    Sign ordinances are notoriously arbitrary, so making a flag exception isn’t a problem unless someone in the city government wants to make it one.

  • It’s the modern day equivalent of

    “Where are your papers?!!!, Where are they?!!!”

    A free society? It’s getting to the point where characters in the Sims have more freedom.

  • So the new flag obscures the view but the other did not for decades? Pretty thin argument. Considering the nature of flags and wind, any real obstruction in line of sight would only occur on days with a steady wind of 20 mph or more.

    Let’s call a spade a spade. There is somebody behind the scenes with an agenda that set this whole thing in motion. A good reporter would find that person – that’s the story.

  • Don’t feed the monkeys people. Anyone in the comments section either agrees and has something to add… or is a DB taking an antagonist view, regardless of the issue.