CommentsDisplaying Sentry353's 10 most recent comments.

• Progressive Vision of Borderless US: Rep Keith Ellison — ‘God Willing…Border Will Become an Irrelevancy’

  December 31, 2010 at 1:51pm

  In reply to guyperram.

  Since there should be no borders and no national identities, shouldn’t our “region of the world” just send the bill to the country of origin of the individual needing assistance or care? Oh wait, with no borders or nationalities, that wouldn’t be possible.

  Do these regressives really believe that treating everyone as surfs doesn’t come with costs? Oh wait, of course they don’t. Their stated objectives are to create a social utopia where people just become a renewable, expendable resource to meet the needs of the government and the political elite (ie ruling class).

  BTW: we should stop calling them “Progressive” since all they want to do is regress society back to the way things were in the dark or middle-ages; where the few ruled over the many and the many existed to serve the few.

• Barney Frank: Not Allowing Gays and Straights to Shower Together is ‘Discrimination’

  December 31, 2010 at 1:35pm

  In reply to Whatsizface.

  If gays are allowed to shower or co-habitat with straights, will straights be allowed to shower and co-habitat with the opposite sex? The reason why men and women aren’t allowed to do that now is because of sexual attraction and the possibility of sexual relations. Allowing someone who might be sexually attracted or aroused to shower or co-habitat with another, regardless of sexual preference or gender just isn’t allowed under the articles of the UCMJ.

  Does this mean that ole Barney is implying that the military should go the “Starship Trooper” route?

• No Compromise: Obama Will Not Extend Tax Cuts for Wealthiest Americans

  September 10, 2010 at 5:53am

  In reply to TwoMinuteMan.

  I would agree with Art Laffer on this one; that a flat tax of 10% across the board (income and capital gains) is more than enough revenue for the federal government to operate off of. That is of course if they reduce spending on or eliminate entitlement programs, get ride of departments that haven’t been productive since the inception (Dept. of Education), and stop subsidizing business in what should be a “Free Market”. Ah but to dream about fiscal responsibility from a constitutionally limited government that promotes a free market economy …

• No Compromise: Obama Will Not Extend Tax Cuts for Wealthiest Americans

  September 10, 2010 at 5:41am

  In reply to Beckofile.

  Dbag, it’s nice to see that you are no longer using ALL CAPS constantly anymore, but you still have a long way to go to perfect your skills as an infilltrator. By all the other comments you’ve made on The Blaze, we all know you haven’t got a clue what the Tea Party is about or what it stands for. Keep trying and we’ll keep praying for you!