Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: Slapweasel

Slapweasel

Member Since: October 17, 2011

CommentsDisplaying Slapweasel's 10 most recent comments.

  • Thank you for letting me off with a warning, Mr. Thought Police. I’ll do better next time.

  • You are certainly correct.

    However, when you tell everyone that you‘re calling Ghostbusters because you’ve seen a movie, you are subject to second-guessing. There’s no such thing as the Easter Bunny or Erin Brockovich.

  • So… Erin drives the Mystery Machine to New York and thinks she can get to the bottom of this. Her face is sure going to be red when she figures out it was Old Man Wilson with a lantern and some old sheets.

  • Some of you are looking at a negative connotation of the word “shrewd”. Are you confusing it with “shrew” -or- “lewd”-? Shrewd has always meant “clever”, “savvy” and “sharp-witted” where I come from. All other forms I see are either obsolete or archaic.

    The first title, calling him “sly” had a little more of a negative connotation. I, however, was able to slough off the title and read this as skeptically as I would any other website.

  • I’d like to start by saying that COLT1860 has done more to get the point across than most of you idiots, combined. That goes for the “Conservatives”, as well. I’d like to point out that that “Neocon” is a bastardized term, meant to cajole; much like “Paulbot” or “*******”.

    -Actual definition of neoconservative: http://www.merriam-webster.com/concise/neoconservatism

    These terms lessen credibility and add nothing to what I feel is a common cause. Debate is constructive criticism and an ideal way to convey information. I despise “forums”, mainly because they are a way for “collective smart-asses” to mentally masturbate themselves and either show off someone else’s witticisms or create half-witted criticisms on-the-spot.

    Thank you, COLT1860, for continuing to ADD to the debate instead of floating nonsense and pure “talking points” …hate the term, but I get it.

    I’d just like to say that I have not spent enough time researching everything I can, but I can certainly stand for Liberty and I do my own research. I don’t follow forum links. I make my own way.

    If Ron Paul makes it to the Ohio ticket, he’s currently at the top of my list. I won’t stop listening to Glenn Beck, either. I‘m nobody’s “bot”. I wish more of the Dr. Paul “representatives” would follow COLT’s example. Thank you, sir.

    -The Self-Proclaimed Voice of Truth and Reason
    -Your Friendly Neighborhood Slapweasel

    P.S. I love Judge Napolitano on FBN. He’s heavy

  • Is ‘Occupy’ movement creeping into the classroom?

    October 17, 2011 at 4:16pm

    In reply to Slapweasel.

    Sorry… “protest” is a progressive (n), not a (v).

  • Allow me to add one more:

    protest (v) – a cacophony of useful idiots whose ignorance is only surpassed by their stench.