New Contributor Column: Media Research Center Head Brent Bozell on “SHAMELESS BIAS BY OMISSION”

User Profile: srjim2000

Member Since: October 01, 2010

CommentsDisplaying srjim2000's 10 most recent comments.

  • This is a great spoof on Elisabeth Warren and the Dems – pay close attention to the names given to the Dems… http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dN2FGuYgtlY

  • Caption that photo!: Ron Paul

    May 12, 2012 at 10:09pm

    This Yamika ought to seal the Jewish vote – despite my affiliations with Code Pink!

  • Here’s the national Girl Scouts of America location site. Pick your state – find your local chapter – and write to them asking them to pull the book from use in your area. You might even referrence this article to help educate them. If the national group is unwilling or slow to act, there‘s no reason grassroots activism can’t achieve the goal.

    http://www.girlscouts.org/councilfinder/

  • Ha ha – we get it – the gay guy is “Miss Mayor” – ha ha…

  • Is this why Glenn wants to move to Texas?

  • Looks like we didn’t have to wait long – it’s here:

    “To defuse ‘flash’ protest, BART cuts riders’ cell service. Is that legal?”
    http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2011/0812/To-defuse-flash-protest-BART-cuts-riders-cell-service.-Is-that-legal

    Excerpt:
    “Because July protests against BART police shootings had turned violent, BART officials took the unusual step to protect public safety, they said. The tactic may have worked: No protests took place Thursday night at BART stations.

    Temporarily shutting down cell service and beefing up police patrols were “great tool[s] to utilize for this specific purpose,” BART police Lt. Andy Alkire told Bay City News Friday. The protests, planned for sometime between 4 and 8 p.m. in transit stations, would likely have disrupted service for many of the 341,000 daily BART passengers.

    Because July protests against BART police shootings had turned violent, BART officials took the unusual step to protect public safety, they said. The tactic may have worked: No protests took place Thursday night at BART stations.

    Temporarily shutting down cell service and beefing up police patrols were “great tool[s] to utilize for this specific purpose,” BART police Lt. Andy Alkire told Bay City News Friday. The protests, planned for sometime between 4 and 8 p.m. in transit stations, would likely have disrupted service for many of the 341,000 daily BART passengers.”

    Seems like BART police are *forcing obama’s hand* and he’ll pr

  • I wonder how this is going to affect Glenns diet once he moves to Texas!?

    Of course, my dogs have always drank out of the toilet and it never hurt them – maybe this will be good for Glenn too?

    I can’t wait to hear what Stu has to say about this turn of events for Glenn!

    I’m sure the left will have a blast calling him a *potty mouth* now! LOL

  • and…
    If you want an example of how decaying the moral fabric of a society effects that society and sets itself up for a dictatorship – you might want to read up on the Weimar Republic. Weimar eroded societal norms – it made the people think they could have their cake and eat it too and gave all the decision making over to the government. Weimar’s erosion of societal beliefs and norms set the stage for Hitler to take power. All the structure had been put in place by that erosion and allowed Hitler to waltz in and usurp the rules to his own means and ends.

    As in Weimar, every great society’s fall has been preceded by an erosion of societal norms and values. Homosexuality, loose morals, greed, vice, marriage erosion, political turmoil, sexual freedom, have all contributed (each in their own small destructive way – like the straw that broke the camel’s back) to the downfall of great societies. It’s happened over and over again – throughout history – it is happening now, in this country, as we allow our state to tell us what is and is not acceptable in so many areas of our lives.

    “We the people” decide what’s in our best interests, and “we the people” starts with our families and the raising of our young in a way “we” see fit to raise them. The crux of the matter lies therefore not within the state(s), it lies within “we the people” and *we the families*.

    Here’s a small primer of Weimar:
    http://www.ukapologetics.net/weimar.html

  • B_RAD says in a post (Rick Perry Clarifies: ‘Obviously Gay Marriage Is Not Fine With Me’):
    “My consevative libertarian values tell me this is a state’s rights issue, and I respect the community of the state to have the right to decide the standards…’

    “States rights” is at the crux of the matter.

    Marriage is an agreement between two people. Marriage should not be a state decision. Marriage is formed by, and condemned or approved, by societal factors. By allowing the state to *form societal norms* for us, we risk losing our choices and rights as to who we can and can not marry. If the state can tell society what marriages are deemed acceptable, then the state is the ultimate authority. If society loses the free exercise of choice in marriage, then we lose how we choose to raise our families – how we freely exercise our religious (or non-religious) beliefs – what we think and how we act.

    If the government can step in and say who we can and can not marry, what does that teach our children? What lesson do they learn? That government is the final arbitrator? That “we the people” do not have a voice? Doesn’t this tear at the fabric of the family unit? Can a family unit survive the wholesale slaughter by the government of prized value systems? Would the state then be able to tell us who we *have* to marry – or if we can marry at all? Would these things be good for the family?

    Is society and “we the people” king – or is the state the

  • This story makes me wonder if what Glenn said about Israel *getting it* – is really as accurate as he thinks. T‘would appear the socialists and marxists calling for Israel’s destruction have infiltrated the populace of Israel too…