CommentsDisplaying Sue Dohnim's 10 most recent comments.

• Did You Know? Obama Apparently Spoke at a 1996 Event Hosted by a Socialist Group

  May 26, 2012 at 5:53pm

  In reply to inferno.

  Bill O‘Reilly said Obama is “socialistic” (WHAT THE) and not an old school type Marxist like Stalin (TRUE). But he doesn’t figure it out…
  Obama is a Marxist, not like Stalin but a Western Marxist through the Antonio Gramsci line of institutional and cultural critical theory. Gramsci was critical of Marx and expanded his theories. Far more dangerous than Marxs lunatic writings.

  Even Marxist don’t agree on what Marxism is…. by definition Marxism is a perpetual struggle against the dominant hegemony, if that dominant orthodoxy is Marxist, then they must reject it. Marxism taken to its logical end is a perpetual struggle and revolution against perception and reality. In other words, Marxism is a state of perpetual adolescence, live in the now, destroy any dominant structure. A perpetual struggle against REALITY. NUTS

  Marxism is a scam, a form of brainwashing and coercion by those that seek power over others,.

  So, to be more specific Obama is a NEOMARXIST from the Western Marxist lineage. A revolution aimed at the Western hegemony implemented through infiltration, control and manipulation of the agents of culture, media, education and knowledge. aka MASS BRAINWASHING to achieve power.

  But, IMO O’Reilly is a pinhead… almost all the time

• UN to Regulate the Internet? House of Representatives Set to Examine Bill Next Week

  May 26, 2012 at 5:06pm

  The goal of the UN is to destroy by subversion the sovereignty of nation states,, subjugated authority beyond the democratic process of Nations to an unaccountable supranational body. A SINGLE GLOBAL SOCIALIST FASCIST STATE.

  “This involves the shift of national regulatory powers to vast regional authorities; the strengthening of decision making structures far above and far below the grasp of democracies; and, above all, the integration of the Soviet and Chinese … into the global market system.”

• Van Jones Slams the Tea Party Again: ‘The So-Called Patriots…Smashing Down Every American Institution’

  May 26, 2012 at 3:01pm

  Jones added that the Tea Party is trying to “take a wrecking ball — and paint it red, white, and blue — and smash down all the things our parents did for us.”

  Like increased Government dependency, massive debt, bloated and wasteful State apparatus and erosion of liberty, freedom and property rights.. thanks mom, dad,,, call me

  Hey Mister Jones, we are on to you.. Your Marxist lies and deceptions only work on the indoctrinated, who are unwilling to think for themselves.

  The biggest threat to these sociopathic tyrants is liberty of the mind, critical thought, reason, logic and truth. To them it has been a WesternMarxist revolution of the “mind” aka brainwashing, that is over..

• SPLC Names New Black Panther Malik Zulu Shabazz to Its ‘Radical Right’ Activist List (Along With Frank Gaffney & David Barton!)

  May 25, 2012 at 5:49pm

  In reply to Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}.

  SPLC only tracks the radical right they claim,,, at least by their definition

  This is a form of propaganda by framing radicalism as “right only” (though inaccurate)

  This outfit is just a front for Soros & Co to attack their enemies from a perceived legitimate source and move the Overton window

  It is all a game of distraction and manipulation. PROPAGANDA and ideological subversion

• Why Is The State Dept. Partnering With ‘Speedway Bomber’ Brett Kimberlin?

  May 25, 2012 at 5:32pm

  Soros and Marxist MO, fund and support the enemy and agitator of your enemy..

  The idiocy is that the subversion is from within and mostly funded by taxpayers either directly from Government agencies or laundered through non taxed nonprofit front organizations..

  This is a cancer that so entwined into the system that it may take the complete destruction and collapse of the system to kill it..

• Did You Know? Obama Apparently Spoke at a 1996 Event Hosted by a Socialist Group

  May 25, 2012 at 5:03pm

  In reply to Sue Dohnim.

  @LLOYD DRAKO
  “I think that the idea of total, absolute individual liberty with a government whose sole purpose is to protect a free market, is at least as utopian as the dream of a hopey-changey socialist”

  ————–

  This is your straw-man fallacy,,,

  The Government should protect the individual and property from plunder.. but both right and left have become the plunderer.. True Conservatism advocates for the individual while the Republican Party are mostly Socialist light….

• Did You Know? Obama Apparently Spoke at a 1996 Event Hosted by a Socialist Group

  May 25, 2012 at 4:52pm

  In reply to Sue Dohnim.

  @LLOYD DRAKO

  Marxism has many definitions depending on the context, Alinsky was a Marxist and you seem intent on distracting the issue to knock the Tea Party and the right. But the facts are, Obama is a Marxist, he was born into Marxism, he had a Marxist mentor, he was attracted to Marxist Professors, he was trained by a Marxist. His policies and rhetoric are Marxist. Specifically, Gramscian Western Marxism and to deny this is juvenile,, What may be in dispute are his motives,, is he a pure idealist or using it for purely power, probably both, first idealism then power. But true Marxists are Narcissists and often Sociopaths, they must lie, deceive and manipulate to achieve their goal of imposing by coercion their ideology onto others. Ends justifies the means…

  I just don’t know why those that have the ability to actually understand this stuff still choose to remain in denial and continue to push Tyranny and enslavement of themselves, their children and future citizens.

  This is not a left right issue, it is a liberty vs tyranny issue.. the state vs the individual. The terms are malleable but the concept is simple.

  Which is truly empowered.. in a civil society

  The individual (all) or the State (a small coalition of individuals)

• Judge Andrew Napolitano Says S.E. Cupp Likely Doesn’t Have a Case Against Hustler: ‘Protected Satire’

  May 25, 2012 at 3:09pm

  In reply to 1WhoQuestions.

  If this pic is defamation it is not protected speech,

  It is very close to the line, IMO over it but that would be up to a court, of course..

  A satire or parody must be clearly not real and a disclaimer is not an excuse

• Judge Andrew Napolitano Says S.E. Cupp Likely Doesn’t Have a Case Against Hustler: ‘Protected Satire’

  May 25, 2012 at 3:02pm

  In reply to liltexasgal.

  @JROOK

  you must be a farmer, I have never seen so many straw-men played…

• Judge Andrew Napolitano Says S.E. Cupp Likely Doesn’t Have a Case Against Hustler: ‘Protected Satire’

  May 25, 2012 at 2:57pm

  In reply to TJexcite.

  @JROOK

  I agree,
  I am not saying it is easy or a slam dunk, the bar is high, even higher if you are a political figure. I am pointing out the factual errors made by people including the “Judge”. The court test is a complex legal one. Not well understood..

  The image itself looks and represents reality. disclaimers are not a defence
  Flynt is hiding behind the Falwell case which is materially different..

  If the image itself were a drawing or clearly not real then no case, but with photoshop the image is too realistic. That is what makes this unique.