CommentsDisplaying ThaBufe's 10 most recent comments.

• NYC Court Makes a Birth Certificate Ruling…for Transgendered People

  March 28, 2012 at 11:46am

  Personally I don’t care one way or the other. It‘s not my responsibility to enforce God’s laws, it’s my responsibility to live them and considering I often fall short, I‘m in no possition to judge anybody unless they’re directly hurting somebody. What I’d like to know is this:

  If you’re a trasgendered man and have surgery to “become” a woman and you sleep with or marry another man without telling him that you are biolgically a man; can he then press charges of rape? To me this is rape but I’m not sure what the law would say. I know if a man sleeps with a woman while she‘s drunk it’s considered rape and this doesn’t seem much different. Deceiving somebody into a sexual relationship when that person would have otherwise not been willing to participate is rape, so how does this work out?

• Extremely Disturbing Video: Texas Judge Caught Whipping Daughter With Belt

  November 2, 2011 at 4:07pm

  Anybody who’s saying this isn’t abuse needs to have their heads checked. I’m a firm believer in the occasional spanking but there is a line and this guy ran across it like it was a finish line and kept going. As a child, I received my fair share of spankings but they were never anything close to this. She was being disobedient and apparently engaging in illegal activity (certainly not good publicity for a judge if she gets busted) and she should have been appropriately punished. If he thought a spanking was justified, he should have given himself time to fully calm dawn before administering any punishment.
  What I really want to know; if the computer/internet was such a problem for this child, why did he allow her to have one in her bedroom? Seems to me like he enjoys it and was setting her up for failure.

• Republican Congressman Apologizes to Obama for Awkward ‘Tar Baby’ Comment

  August 3, 2011 at 11:12am

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar_baby

  “The Tar-Baby is a doll made of tar and turpentine used to entrap Br’er Rabbit in the second of the Uncle Remus stories. The more that Br’er Rabbit fights the Tar-Baby, the more entangled he becomes. In modern usage according to Random House, “tar baby” refers to any “sticky situation” that is only aggravated by additional contact. The expression tar baby is also used occasionally as a derogatory term for black people (in the U.S. it refers to African-Americans; in New Zealand it refers to Maori), or among blacks as a term for a particularly dark-skinned person. As a result, some people suggest avoiding the use of the term in any context.”

  Just because modern PC idiots have twisted common terms into racially darogatory terms does not mean they actually are and it does not mean I have to change my language and lower myself to your level. If my intent is to offend you’ll know it. If I didn‘t intend to offend you and you get offened anyway then all I have to say is do something about it because I’m tired of playing these games. But just to be fair I’ll let you know, you‘d better make your first move count because I’m ready to take care of this ****.

• Senate Defeats GOP House Budget Plan

  May 25, 2011 at 11:14pm

  In reply to booger71.

  @CALIJOHN
  http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/16
  Stop propagating lies please. Furthermore, it‘s a logical fallacy and downright dishonest to suggest that anybody who’s pissed about Obama‘s debt was okay with Bush’s. In other words, disliking Obama does not mean you loved Bush, to suggest otherwise is complete idiocy.

• Religious ‘Candy Cane Case’ Asks: Do Elementary Students Have First Amendment Rights?

  May 25, 2011 at 3:32pm

  In reply to Liberal_Atheist_Critical_Thinker.

  LACT, if that’s what they want to do, then by all means, go for it. I’m all for fairness. Don‘t try to stomp on my rights and I won’t stomp on yours. Now, if they become outcasts because they distributed those Satanist materials, then that’s their problem but they should be able to distribute whatever they want. I will however draw the line at sacrificing their classmates.

• A ‘No’ From Netanyahu: Israeli PM Rejects 1967 Border Talk in Front of Press

  May 21, 2011 at 9:34am

  In reply to anOpinion.

  @AKMIIKEUS

  That’s right, Israel seized the land by force, just as it was seized by force many times in the past. How do you think they “Palestinian” squatters got there in the first place? Because it was seized by force by somebody else!

  So, if you’re saying it was fair to seize the land FROM the Israelis (and you are saying that), then surely it was fair for them to seize it back. If the iSLUMists can take it back then do so. But they‘re trying to get the UN to do it for them because they know they’d be destroyed if they went up against Israel.

  Face it dude, you’re placing yourself squarely on the wrong side of future history. You either want Israel to win, or the iSLUMist. You can’t have both, period! One will have piece and democracy, the other will have war and mass murder. One will allow it’s people to be free, the other will stone somebody for being gay, will stone a woman not covering her face in public, will stone a woman for getting raped, and go on a killing spree anytime somebody burns a book. I know what side I’m on, and I think you‘ve made it clear what side you’re on. I can only hope you lose, and lose big.