New Contributor Column: Media Research Center Head Brent Bozell on “SHAMELESS BIAS BY OMISSION”

User Profile: the blazer

Member Since: September 03, 2010

CommentsDisplaying the blazer's 10 most recent comments.

  • Did someone say upside down and inside out?

  • This is not about the publisher’s free speech. This is about his flawed individual behavior. He used his rights to denigrate another individual on the basis of her right to free speech which doesn’t agree with his. The publisher does not respect free speech. He has appointed himself the judge of what the rest of us can say without being targeted by him. He intended to use his freedom to damage her instead of just voicing disagreement with her. He lacks maturity when fear of losing the intellectual debate and anger get control of him. I suppose he would also assault George Washington for his rules of behavior.

  • I didn‘t read this article because I don’t care about these people. I didn’t look at the blaze article about Ms. Cupp because I don’t need to see the obscene image. I just want to say that the government and others scrub images from the net, so can the magazine publisher. Google can scrub it from their search results. THAT LEAVES THE REST OF THE UNIVERSE TO ACT LIKE DECENT HUMAN BEINGS AND SCRUB THEIR OWN COMPUTERS.

  • The Jeopardy embarrassment had to be countered with something.

  • If Sharpton, Jackson, or Wright, had been there to tell them what to do, they would have eagerly followed orders to help Mr. Bentley. Mr. Bentley would have his picture taken with the notorious “leaders” who would be called defenders of the people who “helped” Mr. Bentley. Those who actually assisted him would be ignored.

    Everything wrong in America and the world is the result of politics in the hands of scoundrels, and in America it’s We the People who let them do it; so it’s half our fault. Not just the ones who vote for progressives, but all of us who refuse to do our civic duty to hold electeds accountable and get them out of office accordingly, and because we let them indoctrinate our children who grow up to expect immediate gratification and without the ability to use critical thinking.

    Instead, they look up to fame and authority and do what they are told without independent analysis. It’s not their job to help Mr. Bentley, it‘s somebody else’s job until the government, an NGO, or a famous person steps in to tell them what to do.

    Thank you, Mr. Bentley, for your military service. I hope you can help your neighbors learn from your sad experience. Many of us would have helped you, just like everyone was helped on 9-11.

    That’s who most of us still are.

  • God Bless You.

  • I don’t like your post.

  • Reproductive rights? Can a person who CLAIMS to be sex-denied force someone of their “CHOICE” to have sex with them using their right to choose to bear, because they can‘t exercise their right to reproduce if they can’t afford the test tube approach? Or does the taxpayer have to provide the test tube service.

    How many times does a person get to exercise his right to reproduce by his targeted reproducer if it doesn’t work – 100 times, once a week, until it works? Can a sperm donor force someone to have sex and bear a child using his right to choose to reproduce because he can’t reproduce own? What if the sperm donor wants more children? What if the sperm donor doesn’t want to raise the offspring?

    Does an infertile person have the right to have sex at all? How do we pay reparations to an infertile person who is denied his reproductive rights by birth? Are the fertile people expected to reproduce for the infertile ones?

  • Wanna guess why the 2 sides don’t get together in a public forum and debate the issue?

    “… nearly two years to the day after similar emails ignited the Climategate scandal.
    Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data. …
    ‘… One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process,’ writes Phil Jones, a scientist working with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change …
    ‘Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden,” … “I’ve discussed this with the main funder (U.S. Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.’
    ‘Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the tropical troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and discount a wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We need to communicate the uncertainty and be honest. …’”

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/11/23/climategate-2-0-new-e-m

  • Excuse me, but the independents went for the most extreme socialist presidential candidate to admit to being a wealth redistributor last time around, on the undefined premise of some kind of “hope and change”. As a result of those now well-defined transformative assaults on individual rights, I don’t think independent voters are looking for anything less than a return to the Constitution. That’s a lot more than just a little right of center in the anti-socialist year of 2012.