New Contributor Column: Media Research Center Head Brent Bozell on “SHAMELESS BIAS BY OMISSION”

User Profile: TheSoundOf Truth

TheSoundOf Truth

Member Since: March 18, 2011

CommentsDisplaying TheSoundOf Truth's 10 most recent comments.

  • Apparently, he likes to “handle small packages”.

  • when asked what he liked most about his new job, the former priest responded “I really dig the fringe benefits”

  • wow.

    Those links in the article just gave this loser a massive amount of publicity.

    Nice Job, Blaze…

  • Hey, how many blondes does it take to screw in a light bulb?

    “Uhhh…like, what’s a light bulb??”

  • “biker Right wing macho types”

    HUH?

    That has got to be the most outrageous thing I have ever read on the blaze.

    It’s so absurd that….it’s….oh my….is that satire?

  • BULL.

    If she was black and they portrayed her working in the cotton fields in 1854, they’d be sued into oblivion.

  • Wait…

    Barack Obama was portrayed as a Monkey in a “satirical picture” and Scott Adams was SLAMMED for defending it under the first amendment right to free speech. The photo was vilified, and you can’t seem to find it online anymore, unless you do a deep search for it.

    Yet, Flynt sexually denigrates a woman in a similar manner as the monkey photo, and he is “protected”?

    So, race is off limits, but gender isn’t? OH, unless it’s about a gay or a tranny. Then you are in trouble…?

    Mahar did the same thing regarding Palin. People in the media were more concerned about him referring to a black man than they were about the statement about Palin’s sexuality.

    It’s sick. If Flynt did a piece on SE Cupp, but without the “commentary”, and said “ooooh! Look at this hot chick with a photoshopped willy in her face“ it would actually be ”fine”. But the commentary and the reasons *why* the picture was posted is what makes the picture so wrong.

    So it is the short ‘article’ with the political commentary that I have a problem with. Had it just been a “celebrity fantasy” and not “porno-political commentary” then, who cares. But they went after her because she disagrees with them.

    I would think they were serious about the ‘satire’ thing of they had Sandra Fluke in there as well. Hey, how about some Sandra Fluke and Gloria Steinem girl-hag action? No risk of pregnancy there, huh??? You will never see that in any magazine, satire or not.

  • Everyone knows the national inquirer is BS, right?

    They even have a disclaimer in small print in their magazine as “entertainment” not journalism.

    So why do they have a budget to pay off people who sue them?

    Magazines get sued all the time by celebrities, and it never goes to court because they settle for damages out of court.

    Pick any hollywood a-lister, say, Kate Hudson. Publish explicit photos of her giving an handy-j to say, Strom Thurman, and state that she is a *whore* because of her political views and how she gives money to politicians.

    The lawsuit you’d get would be through the ROOF. This happens all the time. There is a double standard in our society that if you don’t “Get in line” with mainstream opinion, you are fair game.

    But, someone like Susan Powers, whom is Cass Sunstein’s wife (hey, long bright red hair and well developed bosom-not bad, eh?) is off limits; Why is that?

    Flynt’s article was to single out SE Cupp for her political view points. Period.

    No, don’t ban ALL SATIRE. But something has to be “satirical” in order for it to be “satire”. Jonathan Swift: Satire. Hustler‘s article on SE with a phallus in her face because she disagrees with Flynt’s opinions: Not Satire.

  • Soybomb, everyone knows the national inquirer is BS, right?

    They even have a disclaimer in small print in their magazine as “entertainment” not journalism.

    So why do they have a budget to pay off people who sue them?

    Magazines get sued all the time by celebrities, and it never goes to court because they settle for damages out of court.

    Pick any hollywood a-lister, say, Kate Hudson. Publish explicit photos of her giving an handy-j to say, Strom Thurman, and state that she is a *whore* because of her political views and how she gives money to politicians.

    The lawsuit you’d get would be through the ROOF. This happens all the time. There is a double standard in our society that if you don’t “Get in line” with mainstream opinion, you are fair game.

    But, someone like Susan Powers, whom is Cass Sunstein’s wife (hey, long bright red hair and well developed bosom-not bad, eh?) is off limits; Why is that?

    Flynt’s article was to single out SE Cupp for her political view points. Period.

    No, don’t ban ALL SATIRE. But something has to be “satirical” in order for it to be “satire”. Jonathan Swift: Satire. Hustler‘s article on SE with a phallus in her face because she disagrees with Flynt’s opinions: Not Satire.

  • “Are you saying a person has exclusive rights to their image?”

    Barry Bonds and Peyton Manning seem to think so.