New Contributor Column: Media Research Center Head Brent Bozell on “SHAMELESS BIAS BY OMISSION”

User Profile: Steve Neiling

Member Since: September 16, 2010

CommentsDisplaying Steve Neiling's 10 most recent comments.

  • This is one of the ways people are indoctrinated into the notion of the necessity of big, paternalistic (or should I say, maternalistic) government. We must never feel nor experience the sting of failure or disappointment. It is the very premise upon which a welfare state is built–our citizens must be protected from their own failures, they must be made comfortable in their poverty. Incentives to improve are taken away. It’s just a sad, pitiful state of affairs.

  • The body inside the body? Really? What makes the outside body suddenly superior to the inside body? Couldn’t the same argument be made for the body inside having superiority? What if we used that logic? What if we delivered the “body inside the body” and then destroyed the “outside” one? If someone has to die here, why are we picking on the infant? Abortion kills someone. I think we would reconsider the whole thing if the victim was the “outside body!”

  • Want to See Rep. Allen West Rip ‘Think Progress’?

    February 21, 2012 at 3:10pm

    In reply to rambosharley.

    @JROOK
    I have to disagree with your premise. When a candidate runs for office he ought to be perfectly honest regarding his views and opinions. If the majority of the voters in his jurisdiction agree with those views and opinions, he gets elected to the office for which he ran. He then represents the majority view of his constituents. For instance, like it or not, Barack Obama presented himself in such a way as to convince the majority of the electorate that he shared their views. We in the minority are stuck with that until the next election. A democratic republic isn’t always pretty but its worked well enough so far.

  • @Kegbuna
    The problem, as I see it, is that gov’t assisstance has undermined American charity. I think we are capable of taking care of ourselves and our own. I think removing the tax-funded safety nets would go a long way in incentivizing people to aspire to higher things. If a friend or family member of mine is struggling financially, I try to help out in any I can. And I hope the same from them if I have to struggle. I think the great adventure of being an American is striking out on your own–being independent. That’s the fun and the danger of living in a free land. Your success is entirely your success and your failure is entirely your failure. Tough? You bet it is. But it’s the price we pay to breathe the free air.

  • Actually, since Jesus holds the titles Christ (Anointed One), Lord of lords, King of kings, Prince of Peace, etc., it would seem to me that He is a monarchist through and through. The realm over which He rules is a Kingdom, not a republic or any other form of government. I would assume then, that He favors a benevolent monarchy.

  • Personally, I think two general qualifications for public office are required:
    1. The candidate must be a citizen of his/her jurisdiction.
    2. The candidate should reasonable be able to carry out his duties should he gain office.
    Ms. Cabrera may fulfill the first requirement but does she adequately fulfill the second?

  • Did they move American Idol to Tuesday nights?!!

  • I think you’re sadly mistaken. Religion is the framework within which any relationship actually works. All of life is filled with rhythm and ritual–mornings and evenings, changing seasons, planting and harvest, heading to work and coming home and on and on. Religious ritual is much the same. In the context of traditions and rituals our relationship with God is nourished and strengthened. It is religion WITHOUT relationship that is the bane of any soul. We have a word for that: hypocrisy. And those who are hypocrites can be found in every walk of life. Religion is not the problem, hypocrisy is. So back off a little bit OK.

  • Because some of that money I contributed. That money represents hours of my life, my toil, my sweat. Do you work for something that you are diametrically opposed to? Do you spend one minute of your life working for something that is morally repugnant to you? The communal money has a source you know; it doesn’t appear magically. And in this nation, we do not take money from our citizens and use it to strip them of their basic freedom of conscience. At least that’s the theory. Unfortunately that theory has fallen out of practice and favor over the past fifty or so years.

  • I guess we‘re finding out what’s in the bill. Isn’t that what Ms. Pelosi said would happen once it passed? It seems as if Obamacare is a great Pandora’s Box or Trojan Horse–filled with surprises yet to come!