Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: Verus Langham

Verus Langham

Member Since: June 09, 2011

CommentsDisplaying Verus Langham's 10 most recent comments.

  • Well said, well said!!

  • Your high profile with a statement like this keeps you irrelevant… but anonymous – not so much: you are known by the very nature of your irreverent quip. We as Christians have only one moral imperative as to speech in that we steadfastly reject blaspheming the Holy Spirit of God as it is the one and only sin cited that leads to spiritual death.
    Good luck in avoidance of that death warrant throughout your lifetime.

  • Your comment makes no sense in its entirety because you simply do not grasp the plainly stated facts of the matter…. Texas is paying for their education; if you are in Afgan(istan) then why are you poking around in our politics in the first place? We honestly do not need foreign intervention to inject itself in our political processes, you know!

  • The essence of the whole matter lies in this one thing: if the federal laws as written were applied to all illegal immigrants, this issue of educating their children would be moot…. there would not be any here to contend with. There would be no jobs for the interpreters or the special education teachers (bilingual) because all the teachers would be committed to teaching in our national language, English. There would be no difficulties in people native born to be at odds with a system that shows favoritism towards one group to the exclusion of the other (illegal vs. citizen) – both students requiring free tuition and parents requiring social services (free legal, free medical, food stamps, et al). There would be no loss of a citizen’s job because of an illegal immigrant holding the one that he could fill.
    Haven’t we learned enough in that while our corporations have relocated to Mexico and other parts of the world and thereby taking with them the associated jobs? Does it make sense for us to “import” illegals who perform well in manual labor and domestic jobs and thereby rob a citizen of that opportunity for employment?
    I believe that should all the ills suggested by a departure from obeying the law to its fullest should result in the imposition of huge fines levied against those who violate the law by hiring illegal immigrants (aliens if you prefer) and transfer the accommodating responsibility and burden upon those employing them..labor/domestic, wh

  • I do not believe for one minute that the essence of the whole matter lies in this one thing: if the federal laws as written were applied to all illegal immigrants, this issue of educating their children would be moot…. there would not be any here to contend with. There would be no jobs for the interpreters or the special education teachers (bilingual) because all the teachers would be committed to teaching in our national language, English. There would be no difficulties in people native born to be at odds with a system that shows favoritism towards one group to the exclusion of the other (illegal vs. citizen) – both student requiring free tuition and parents requiring social services (free legal, free medical, food stamps and other practical help). There would be no loss of a citizen’s job because of an illegal immigrant holding the one that he could fill.
    Haven’t we learned enough in that while our corporations have relocated to Mexico and other parts of the world and thereby taking with them the associated jobs? Does it make sense for us to “import” illegals who perform well in manual labor and domestic jobs and thereby rob a citizen of that opportunity for employment?
    I believe that should all the ills suggested by a departure from obeying the law to its fullest should result in the imposition of huge fines levied against those who violate the law by hiring illegal immigrants (aliens if you prefer) and transfer the accommodating responsibility an

  • As for Governor Perry I might ask if given the chance, “How can you claim your opponents (those who oppose your immigration law views) to be persons without a heart if they attack your position? As a governor you’ve contributed vast Texas citizenry’s resources to bolster the border protections against the encroachment of illegal immigration; and yet, wasn’t it you who sponsored the Texas Corridor super-hiway scheme… wherein literally thousands of acres of Texas land has been set apart for the construction of a vast network of highways leading directly from the border all the way to Canada? Are we so naive at the suggestions of that and not be able to draw a further observation that the fence along the border just might be to keep our citizens locked in should a centrist government deem it a necessity to contain people, to reduce their options to migrate, to rob them of yet one more freedom… and all this while allowing greater influx of illegals as they move their NAFTA goods up and down those super hiways?”
    You see, I do not think it is a matter of being heartless at all – it IS a matter of your unwillingness to compromise your role in the globalist elite’s plan to unify our three countries (Mexico – and points south, USA, and Canada) into one American Union. It is for this reason that you will never gain my support and certainly not my vote – regardless of how popular you may become in your dynamic jaunt to the front line of my chosen party. I am

  • I’ve wondered for quite some time now just what it was about this fella Ron Paul that has excited so much frenzy from the squeamish at heart – those not predisposed to take on the establishment and set the record straight, as seems that Ron does. And he does so in a manner that is not uncivil or pretentious. His mannerism of reporting the views he holds fervently is commendable because it stems from the heart of a true patriot. I have half-held my thoughts prior to listening to that link @”"A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 8:37pm

    Just putting this out there:

    Thought Controllers Call Ron Paul “Extreme”
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FFhSr1A1do “”
    And I must agree with SHOOBY who commented, “I have never seen or heard Ron Paul whine or snivel about anything”, because I have only seen those reactions occurring in the camps of those who oppose his views – you know the type, they never have any facts to back up their weak-knee-ed philosophical bent; they only like to hear the sound of their voice as it slips off their tongue and through their clenched teeth (yeah, at the same instant) while their diatribe unfortunately falls on far too many ears (some actually hearing their ilk will be prone to accept what is spoken because it sounds so right.
    By and large Tom Woods (in the video) has vacated my tribal fears and instituted anew my pilgrim’s innate self-expression which stems from my gift of reason and ability to hear the war

  • Just the sort of ilk one would expect of one who has taken the Muslim in chief’s first adopted name as his avitar.. don’t you folks get it: under our Constitution we are granted the freedom from government intervention in our religious gatherings… your kind are always quick to quote the “separation of church and state” cliche whenever it fits your arguments… but herein the shoe is on the other foot and it is the government which has imposed regulations that countermand the tenets of what is clearly stated therein. If you’d taken the time to really read the article you might have discovered that it was said the neighbors were supportive, not against them – with only one dissenter who voiced his/her complaint. (Apparently they worked that out). The end of the matter will restore law and order and further define their inalienable right to peaceful assembly for any purpose they choose. Snotty remark that! (yours)

  • A highly intelligent approach to this matter and with the stroke of his mighty pen he has returned to the citizens of his state the promise for and a belief in one’s right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness… and made it defensible and therefore to be respected by the law abiding, feared by the would-be tyrants in governmental positions at the lowest to the highest positions and criminals.

  • One can understand why we who live in our western culture view this as a mainstay of our belief in the threat of the encroachment of Islam into our society.. this atrocity is in direct conflict with our moral code and highlights yet another of our cause to repel at all costs the inclusion of any and all law which suggests that invisible Allah is the sole arbitrater, “It behooves those who call for setting a minimum age for marriage to fear Allah and not contradict his Sharia, or try to legislate things Allah did not permit. For laws are Allah’s province; and legislation is his excusive right, to be shared by none other. And among these are the rules governing marriage.”, for “his Sharia”….. for this deadly menace to our children’s future must be governed by our moral code not theirs. Our country is already plagued with child molesters whose minds we deem to be sadistic rages against the injustices they themselves may have suffered at the hands of (sometimes) parents, uncles/aunts, or total strangers who really only seek to justify their horrendously unmerciful acts against nature.