CommentsDisplaying yzf75044's 10 most recent comments.

• Pope Benedict: Gay Marriage Threatens the ‘Future of Humanity Itself’

  January 10, 2012 at 3:12pm

  In reply to yiska8.

  Please explain how allowing gays to marry will reduce the population. If they are not married they will not procreate, if they are not married they may not procreate. Although, if indeed you are procreation and the younger generation caring for the older – gay married couples may actually increase procreation. A gay male couple and a gay female couple often are willing to surrogate children for each couple. Not allowing these gays (as they will still be gay regardless) to marry may give them the sense of stability to desire to have a child.

• Beck Uses Math ‘Equation’ to Explain Argument Against Gay Marriage

  January 6, 2012 at 11:55am

  In reply to love the kids.

  Oh dear goodness what will the gays go after next? To be equal with equal protections, equal tax codes, equal insurance – What will they want next tsk tsk tsk – I use sarcasm. This is what happens when the govt gets involved with marriage to begin with determining who should get benefits and such. They inserted themselves with IRS, Social Security, Health Benefits, allowing companies to offer benefits – had they stayed out to begin with – would any of this have been an issue.

  Me personally this is an example of Big governement needing more government to explain and regulate the big government. If you want to take away the “powers” gay seek by desiring gay marriage – then remove ALL govt benefits, rules regulations, stipulations tied to straight marriage. I think you will find that a great number of gays still want to marry and make public commitments of their devotion to each other.

  One last thing though – When will Santorum or Beck try to Outlaw Divorce except for the listed reason in the Bible? To protect marriage we should remove legal divorce.

• Beck Uses Math ‘Equation’ to Explain Argument Against Gay Marriage

  January 6, 2012 at 11:47am

  Actually according to Merriam-Webster bigotry Definition of BIGOT

  : a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

  Marriage in the past has had a whole host of meanings, definitions and characteristics.

• Beck Uses Math ‘Equation’ to Explain Argument Against Gay Marriage

  January 6, 2012 at 11:43am

  Why does everyone thing that two comitted people will create a flood gate for MORE than two people to get married. I agree that the government should indeed be OUT of marriage. But I disagree that it wouldn’t still equal one + one equals two. AT THE extreme it COULD be 0.8+1.2 = 2. I still think it is the same 1+1=2. 1 apple+ 1 apple = 2 apples. :)

• Tenn. Senate OKs Ban on Teaching of Homosexuality

  May 21, 2011 at 10:27am

  —-So a recap – This is to clarify a ban on teaching anything other than natural reproduction in K-8 in PUBLIC schools – EVEN WHILE *Teaching ANY* sexual reproduction science is *Already* prohibited and is a Class C Felony

  Those who are political and care about the (R) or (D) behind someone’s name should definitely watch this video. While the (D) were arguing against it – they even agreed with actual ORIGINAL intent of not allowing the teaching of homosexual…ity. So they agreed with the author to begin with. For those of you who Know who your State senator is
  No’s – Ford, Herron (Who was afraid the bill would not allow a “God Fearing Teacher from teaching Ethics and Morality), Kyle, Marrero (who is my rep – didn’t say a word), Tate
  Yes’s – Gresham, Kelsey, Norris
  No Vote – Finney

• Tenn. Senate OKs Ban on Teaching of Homosexuality

  May 21, 2011 at 10:26am

  I believe in educating yourself before making a conclusion
  Ok – So my anger got the best of me and I actually looked into this law. I hope it is OK to post on here.

  So here is the Nitty Gritty on SB0049 – actually VERY interesting

  http://tnga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=196&clip_id=4320

  you can scroll down and click on SB0049 link – or fast forward to 54:58 minute mark. I encourage everyone who is outraged about this actually watch this clip. Even those (D) who voted against it – even they agreed that Homosexuality should not be taught.

  So
  -TCA 49-06-1005 PROHIBITS discussing ANY sexual reproduction courses in the K-8 range already.
  -Subsection A says – unless course is approved (by the state or Local Education Association) – which the board has said they will NOT approve. This same law makes it a FELONY to discuss a…ny sexual reproduction.
  - Therefore this bill is “clarifying” something that is already expressly prohibited. Those arguing against this bill ALSO said they feared it would open the door to ALLOW sexual education of K-8

  FURTHERMORE
  - Any heterosexual parents who believe in in-vitro should also be advised that you are included in this ban (the ban that is being placed in side of the ban already)

  In its original form it contained the “heterosexuality” word – now it contains the word “Natural.”

  —-So a recap – This is to clarify a ban on teaching anything other than natural reproduction in K-8 in PUBLIC schools – EVEN W

• What You Didn’t See: NPR Execs…Proud of GOP Past, Love Fiscal Conservatism, Compare Fairness Doctrine to Communist Russia & Defend Intellect of Fox Viewers

  March 10, 2011 at 8:58pm

  In reply to dcwu.

  The video DOES exist by the way. Took me all of 4 minutes to find it.
  http://vimeo.com/20895648