Environment

Congressional Logrolling Threatens to Clear-cut Alaska’s Tongass Forest

S.E. Robinson is a political journalist based in Washington, DC. and the Deputy Director of the Paul Revere Project.
S.E. Robinson is a political journalist based in Washington, DC. and the Deputy Director of the Paul Revere Project.
[ x ]

Robinson: Congressional Logrolling Threatens to Clear cut Alaskas Tongass National Forest

Ted Stevens may be gone, but his legacy lives on.

Sen. Lisa A. Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Rep. Donald E. Young (R-Alaska) are the ringleaders behind legislation (S.730 & H.R.1408) that would allow Sealaska Corporation of Juneau to clear-cut the Tongass National Forest.

Supporters of the proposed land transfer met last Wednesday with representatives of the Department of Agriculture to discuss legislation that will allow Sealaska to make land selections from an area that includes the Tongass’ few remaining old-growth stands.

Sealaska led the charge behind Alaskans Standing Together, the super PAC that propelled Murkowski from GOP-primary-loser to write-in-winner and Republican Senator in 38 days by spending $1.7 million on a pro-Murkowski ad campaign.

Following meetings with congressional committees last week, multiple Capitol Hill sources involved in the discussions said the Murkowski-Young legislation is gaining traction in the Republican-controlled House and could emerge as part of an omnibus package pending the actions of the House Natural Resources Committeeβ€”which is bad news for the ancient trees Sealaska wants to harvest, but far worse for the local communities the corporation’s logging threatens to destroy.

Sealaska is one of 12 regional corporations Congress created through the Alaskan Native Land Claims Settlement Act of 1971 oversee the distribution to the native population of roughly $1 billion in federal funds and 44 million acres of land.

The largest non-federal landholder in Southeast Alaska, Sealaska stands to gain an additional 123-33 square miles of territory, depending on how House Republicans feel about another wilderness omnibus debacle.

Sealaska pays no taxes on the land it currently owns and harvests and enjoys 8(a) non-competitive contracting status with the federal government. But the corporation is not strapped for cash. In addition to its donations to AST, Sealaska has paid $700,000 in logrolling fees to lobbyists including its favorite lobbying firm Van Ness Feldman. Murkowski’s bill would also allow them to receive any and all federal energy and environmental tax credits.

Gene Natkong of Hydaburg, a native village on Prince of Wales Island, said at Wednesday’s meeting with Department of Agriculture undersecretary Harris Sherman that the bill would help native-owned Sealaska use the β€œtraditional resources” of the Tlingit,Β Haida, &Β Tsimshian people.

But for the local villagers who have made their homes on the land Sealaska wants to log, H.R.1408 spells disaster.

Myla Poelstra, a small-business owner, post mistress, and mother living on Kosciusko Island in Edna Bay, said that Kosciusko is one of several villages that stand to lose if Congress passes the Southeast Alaska Native Land Entitlement Finalization and Jobs Protection Act.

Poelstra said the biggest problem is the economic displacement the act would create. β€œA large part of the island’s population depends on the forest and the sea for their living, and clear-cutting would take this away,” she said.

Poelstra voluntarily represents nine towns in Southeast Alaskaβ€”Thorne Bay, Cape Pole, Hollis, Naukati, Whale Pass, Kupreanof, Port Protection, Edna Bay and Point Baker. She has been fighting Sealaska’s land grabs for more than a decade and traveled to Washington last spring to testify against S.730.

Members of the nine communities Poelstra represents have written numerous letters to Congress, testified at hearings, and organized underground movements through Facebook and websites, but their outcry has fallen on deaf ears. Now, she fears H.R.1408 will be even worse for her small island community.

β€œOur local reps [Albert Kookesh and Bill Thomas] are on Sealaska’s board and our congressman and our Senators are both pushing for the bill,” she said.β€œWe have no representation, not in DC, not in Juneau, not in the newspapers – none.”

Poelstra said that opponents of the corporation are effectively disenfranchised as the result of Sealaska’s utter domination of Alaskan politics.

β€œIt’s been a David and Goliath battle from the start,” said Poelstra.

β€œEvery government entity involved in this process, with the exception of the Department of Agriculture, has had its integrity compromised. The whole deck is stacked in Sealaska’s favor,” she said.

β€œWe can’t even get our governor to respond to us with a form letter.”

Sealaska and other proponents of H.R.1408 argue that the bill is necessary in order for Sealaska to finalize their land claims pursuant to ANCSA. However, documents obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests show that Sealaska made their final land claim selections in 2008 in a letter submitted to the Bureau of Land Management.

Poelstra and citizens from the nine villages involved in their resistance effort sent a public letter to multiple agencies in September of 2010 requesting that Sealaska’s claims be finalized.

But a subsequent letter from the office of Secretary of Interior Kenneth Salazar, also obtained through FOIA requests, reveals that Sealaska had already asked Salazar to delay finalization of the claims made in June, pending the outcome of proposed federal legislation S.881 and H.R.2099, the predecessors of this Congress’ S.730 and H.R.1408.

β€œThese documents reveal that the only obstacle to the finalization of Sealaska’s land claims is Sealaska,” said Poelstra.

β€œSealaska could ask the BLM [Bureau of Land Management] to finalize their claims at any time and the problem would be solved,” said Poelstra. But, she said, such is not in keeping with Sealaska’s desire to harvest the old-growth timber stands that were never part of ANCSA, but are now part of H.R.1408.

β€œIf congress gives the forest to Sealaska, it will be clear cut in two years, and people will have to leave Kosciusko,” said Poelstra.Β  If too many people leave Kosciusko, she said, mainland companies might not provide vital services to the island, creating a devastating domino effect.

β€œMy husband and I are too old to start over somewhere else,” said Poelstra.

When Myla Poelstra began fighting Sealaska’s land grabs, her son was ten-years old. When he overheard her distressing one afternoon, he told her that she was a lot like Horton from Dr. Seuss’ Horton Hears a Who. In the classic children’s book, Horton the Elephant tries to convince a disbelieving world that his microscopic community is real. Her son is now a junior in high school and Poelstra has reached her wit’s end trying to save the island she loves. Unlike the Whos, who eventually made so much noise the world was forced to listen, the cries of Kosciusko have echoed unheard through the vast Alaskan wilderness.

Murkowksi’s Quid Pro Quo with Sealaska

After losing the 2010 GOP primary to Tea Party favorite Joe Miller, Murkowski courted Alaska’s Libertarian Party but found no pony to ride until the native corporations offered to help with a possible write-in campaign. Murkowski made it clear that she would only risk a write-in bid if the corporations would guarantee not only substantial funding but also campaign foot soldiers. Sealaska promised both, and on September 17, 2010, Murkowski announced her intention to run for the Senate seat as a write-in candidate.

According to Federal Election Commission records, Alaskans Standing Together (AST) PAC raised about $1.9 million and paid the bulk to Anchorage-based MSI Communications, Inc. for a comprehensive pro-Murkowski ad campaignβ€”an extraordinarily well funded operation, especially in the Alaskan media market, which consists of a few television networks, a handful of radio stations, and a couple of pro-Murkowski newspapers. Yet the media campaign, powerful and dominant though it was, was not the end or even most of Sealaska’s work on Murkowski’s behalf.

Byron I. Mallot, who has been involved with Sealaska since its inception, served as her campaign manager. Under his direction, ATS operatives canvassed villages to teach the natives how to spell β€˜Murkowski’ and distributed campaign literature, wristbands, campaign apparel and even temporary tattoos that mimicked the ballot and spelled out Murkowski’s name, an act that drew perilously close to a violation of electioneering laws (though proper spelling was ruled unessential to this particular write-in bid.) They even painted busses with the AST logo and used them to shuttle natives to the polls on Election Day.

On November 17, 2010, the election was called in her favor. In late December, Alaskan officials certified Murkowski as Alaska’s senior Senator.

Robinson: Congressional Logrolling Threatens to Clear cut Alaskas Tongass National Forest

An 800-year-old spruce tree on Kosciusko Island

β€œThe scenario that is unfolding in the Tongass is just as tragic as would be the filling of the Grand Canyon, strip mining of Yellowstone or the clear-cutting of the Redwoods,” said Gerry D. Misner, an avid outdoorsman and resident of Kosciusko Island since 2010.

Misner said Sealaska’s plans for the island have already caused upheaval and would be devastating to the local community and an irreplaceable loss for the nation.

β€œI grew up in a logging town and what Sealaska wants to do, what they’ve done, that ain’t logging,” he said. Β β€œSealaska wants to clear-cut continuously a piece of the island the size of Manhattan,” he said.

Robinson: Congressional Logrolling Threatens to Clear cut Alaskas Tongass National Forest

A scene from Sealaska’s logging operation on Prince of Wales Island (S.E. Robinson)

Misner said that Sealaska’s reckless logging has targeted the Tongass’ valuable old-growth spruce in the past, while less desirable wood is tossed into burn piles and disposed of as refuse, despite the perennial need of native Alaskans for firewood.

Robinson: Congressional Logrolling Threatens to Clear cut Alaskas Tongass National Forest

Sealaska harvests only the best old-growth and burns the less valuable portions

β€œLiving here means living sustainably, you take care of what you’ve got,” said Misner, β€œbut Sealaska doesn’t care, most of the board members don’t even live in Alaska, they don’t care,” he said.

Misner and his wife have been living in a fifth-wheel recreational vehicle since moving to Kosciusko in 2010. He has put plans to construct a house for his family on hold because the fate of his island community is so uncertain.

β€œThose trees, some of them are 5 or 6 feet through at the base, those trees hold the island together physically and economically. Once those trees are gone, many of my neighbors will be out of a job,” said Misner.

β€œI don’t know what I’ll do if Sealaska gets the island,” said Misner, β€œbut I know most people here can’t really afford to leave.”

The Origins of Sealaska: Crafting Entitlement in Alaska’s Native Villages

In Alaska’s unique political culture, native-corporate cronyism is the rule not the exception. A good indication of this is Murkowski’s victory in 2010, which was to say the least unlikely.

How unlikely? More people have hit grand-slams off the first pitch they ever faced in the Major Leagues (Kevin Kouzmanoff and Daniel Nava). To put it in a political perspective: with her victory, Murkowski became the only person to lose a GOP primary and subsequently to become a Republican Senator and only the second person in U.S. history to win election to a full term in the Senate via write-in.

Although the opposition to Sealaska’s land grab bill is growing day by day, the time is quickly running out to save the Tongass National Forest and the idyllic Alaskan communities that depend on it.

β€œAlaska is so far removed from the rest of the country, people just don’t pay attention,” said Misner, who moved to Kosciusko from Las Vegas in 2010. β€œSomething like this could never happen in the lower 48,” he said.

Almost one year after her election, Murkowski returned to the Alaskan Federation of Natives’ annual convention to thank them for their vital support during her unusual re-election effort.

“Without a doubt in my mind it was the strength and it was the unity of the Alaskan Native community from Southeast, to southwest, up to the north,” Murkowski told her native audience, “It was that strength and unity that caused us to make history.”

Now the Senator and Sealaska are teaming up to make history again.

Referring to Sealaska Corporation and its allies in Congress, Misner said, β€œIn my opinion, for what it’s worth, these guys operate like the mafia if I’ve ever seen mafia,” he said, β€œand you can quote me on that.”

β€œHarry Reid is a piker compared to Don Young and Lisa Murkowski,” he said.

S. E. Robinson is an independent journalist and native Mainer begrudgingly living in Washington, DC

Comments (3)

  • ReagannoGreen
    Posted on June 15, 2012 at 12:43pm

    I fear the author is much more an environmental extremist flying under false colors than fiscally concerned. Don’t fall for it. The Tongass is 17 million acres almost entirely owned by the federal government and because of the Greens the timber industry is almost non-existent. The same groups opposing opening ANWR which would bring tens of billions of dollars, jobs and energy to Alaska also oppose any economic activity in the Tongass, and in fact, Alaska. Mining, logging, roads, electricity, dams, oil, gas, coal…you name it….they oppose it. Why? Because Alaska is a huge (2x times Texas) resource storehouse, and Watermelon Greens (green on the outside, red on the inside) know that unleashing its potential would thwart their agenda of making resources more scarce and therefore more expensive. Almost all of the Tongass is owned by the feds, produces no income and costs U.S. taxpayers tens of millions per year for federal employees to play around in with their Outside Alaska buddies who won’t endure the year-round weather and the rain, but visit while the sun shines.
    So the trees can either rot and move from Sitka Spruce to their muchlessvaluable climax state of hemlock, or the original Indian residents can get some of the land and put people to work. Van Jones would love the approach of Mr. Robinson, because he pretends to be concerned about economics (and his economic arguments are bogus) in order to derive his political goal of more Wilderness for NoGrowthers.

    Report this comment

    ReagannoGreen  
  • sinsay7
    Posted on May 27, 2012 at 11:48am

    this type of behavior gives republicans a bad name and perpetuates an inaccurate stereotype that they care more about money than the environment

    Report this comment

    sinsay7  
  • 007 tongass
    Posted on May 23, 2012 at 8:22pm

    Just who is doing the log rolling? Who gets what?

    Don Young gets 132 square miles of federal land and 300 miles of roads handed over to Sealaska, and then the Democrats get 3 million acres of wilderness which will lock out morto-rcycle riders and hook and gun users when this precedent is established nationally.

    This is known as a packaged deal, an omnibus, or a tit for tat. Whatever you call it, Republicans in the House pledged not to vote on packaged deals where lemons get wrapped in sugar. Republicans after 2009 vowed not to pass an omnibus wilderness. But to get Young’s bill, Republicans will have to give up their principles– o and help get a mine in Arizona as well.

    So this bill is a bad precedent for access to public lands in the country, bad for all the Alaskan interests which oppose it, and it exposes the hypocrisy of Republicans if they vote for the package.

    Report this comment

    007 tongass  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In