NATO Protest Recap: Black Bloc Chants for ‘Dead Cops’…Bottles of Urine and Feces…CNN Criticizes Cops
Politics Newt Gingrich didn’t need chump change lobbyist money
- Posted on November 30, 2011 at 10:15am by
Eddie Scarry
- Print »
- Email »
While campaigning in South Carolina on Tuesday, Newt Gingrich said he brought in so much cash money in the past by simply making speeches that he never needed to be a lobbyist.
“I did no lobbying of any kind – period,” Gingrich said, according to the Huffington Post. “I’m going to be really direct, OK? I was charging $60,000 a speech. And the number of speeches was going up, not down. Normally, celebrities leave and they gradually sell fewer speeches every year. We were selling more.”
Gingrich has come under a bit of fire recently for reports that he was paid at least $300,000 (some reports say as much as $1.6 million) by home mortgage giant Freddie Mac. Some have suggested Gingrich was working as a lobbyist. He says he was acting as a “historian.”























Submitting your tip... please wait!
Mike Dar
Posted on December 1, 2011 at 4:53pmBy John E. Yang
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, January 22 1997; Page A01
The House voted overwhelmingly yesterday to reprimand House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) and order him to pay an unprecedented $300,000 penalty, the first time in the House’s 208-year history it has disciplined a speaker for ethical wrongdoing.
The ethics case and its resolution leave Gingrich with little leeway for future personal controversies, House Republicans said. Exactly one month before yesterday’s vote, Gingrich admitted that he brought discredit to the House and broke its rules by failing to ensure that financing for two projects would not violate federal tax law and by giving the House ethics committee false information. Enough Said!!
Report Post »Love_America_Or_Leave
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 4:00pmI am not supporting Newt at this point, but think republicans are treated very unfairly in general by the media.
Report Post »