Get BlazeTV

An Airport Screening Method That Is 20 Times More Effective at Catching Deception

"Absorbs a lot of time and gives people a false sense of security."

Technology and pat-downs aside, airport security employs other screening methods to detect potentially dangerous travelers. A new study found one method is over 20 times more effective than others at spotting deceptive people.

What does it involve? Having a simple conversation.

Experiments led by British researchers over eight months at several international airports found that talking to travelers and asking them simple questions is better than just evaluating their body language.

"The U.K. government gave us a challenge that if we didn't think the current airport screening method worked well, then we should come up with a better one," Dr. Thomas Ormerod, the head of the University of Sussex's school of psychology, said in a statement.

Mock deceptive travelers were detected 66 percent of the time in security screening that involved a conversation compared to 3 percent of the time if agents were looking for clues like eye contact or nervousness.

entification at a special TSA Pre-check lane at Terminal C of the LaGuardia Airport on January 27, 2014 in New York City. Once approved for the program, travelers can use special expidited Precheck security lanes. They can also leave on their shoes, light outerwear and belt, as well as keep their laptop and small containers of liquids inside carry-on luggage during security screening. The TSA plans to open more than 300 application centers across the country. (John Moore/Getty Images) New research suggests looking for suspicious behavior is far less effective than gauging travelers responses to simple questions. (John Moore/Getty Images)

"The suspicious-signs method almost completely fails in detecting deception," Ormerod said. "In addition, it costs a lot of money, absorbs a lot of time and gives people a false sense of security."

Looking for suspicious signs is a tactic used in the United States, as well as other countries.

Using what researchers called theĀ Controlled Cognitive Engagement method, agents asked passengers things like the name of their high school principal or how long they thought it would take to reach their final destination.

According to the study, it didn't matter if agents knew the truth to the answers, but they looked for other clues instead, such as evasive or short responses.

Not only was this technique used by agents, who were trained for the study, more effective at catching student actors and police detectives posing as deceptive travelers, but the researchers believe it could cut down on racial profiling as well because every passenger is asked questions.

The more security agents used the CCE method, the better they got at catching deceptive travelers as well. According to the study agents went from being 60 percent accurate in the first month to 72 percent accurate by the sixth month. Those using suspicious signs, conversely, got worse over time.

"When we can tell when our kids or spouses are lying, we think that those sorts of signs are going to work with everyone, but people lie differently," OrmerodĀ said. "You can't assign one particular behavioral sign as a sign of lying. It's how someone's behavior changes during questioning that reveals deception."

In addition to being used in airport security, the researchers think this method could be beneficial at sporting venues, in court, in business or in criminal investigations.

This study was published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology.

One last thing…
Watch TheBlaze live and on demand on any device, anywhere, anytime.
try premium
Exclusive video
All Videos
Watch BlazeTV on your favorite device, anytime, anywhere.
Subscribe Now
Daily News Highlights

Get the news that matters most delivered directly to your inbox.