Chelsea Mitchell, in middle of yellow box, placed 4th in Connecticut girls' 100-meter dash in 2018; transgender female sprinters to her left and right came in 1st and 2nd. (Image source: Twitter video screenshot via @GameTimeCT)
© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
USA Today deletes 'hurtful language' from op-ed by female HS sprinter angry she's lost to biological males. What apparently was so 'hurtful'? She called them 'males.'
May 27, 2021
USA Today is feeling the backlash after deleting what it termed "hurtful language" from an op-ed by a female high school sprinter upset that's she's been forced to race against — and has lost to — biological males who identify as female. In short, transgender females.
And what apparently was so "hurtful"?
Whatever else she may have written, Chelsea Mitchell referred to her aforementioned opponents as "male" or "males" — and USA Today later cut those references from her piece.
See, in WokeWorld, that's known as "misgendering" — and it's a no-no.
What are the details?
Townhall said Mitchell's USA Today op-ed first ran over the weekend — but by Tuesday the paper added an editor's note at the top: "This column has been updated to reflect USA TODAY's standards and style guidelines. We regret that hurtful language was used."
Alliance Defending Freedom — which is representing Mitchell and other female Connecticut track athletes in a lawsuit over having to compete against transgender females — stated that USA Today editors "without notice to Chelsea, changed the word 'male' to 'transgender' throughout her piece."
Indeed, the Internet Archive reveals that the May 23 version of Mitchell's USA Today op-ed contains 11 references to "male" and "males" — but they all were either deleted outright or replaced with the word "transgender" in the piece's present form.
Here's one example from Mitchell's original piece: "Instead, all I can think about is how all my training, everything I've done to maximize my performance, might not be enough, simply because there's a runner on the line with an enormous physical advantage: a male body."
Catch those last three words? Well, they're gone now.
The new sentence uses the word "transgender" before "runner" — and the words "a male body" have vanished: "Instead, all I can think about is how all my training, everything I've done to maximize my performance, might not be enough, simply because there's a transgender runner on the line with an enormous physical advantage."
What's been the reaction?
As you might expect, folks got angry at USA Today. Christiana Holcomb of ADF certainly gave the paper what for:
What was the "hurtful language" that editors deleted from Chelsea's opinion piece three days after publication? The word "male." 2/3— Christiana Holcomb (@Christiana Holcomb) 1622051367
USA Today violated its principles to appease the mob. This blatant censorship violates the trust we place in media to be honest brokers of public debate. \n\nChelsea\u2019s experience & viewpoint matters. That\u2019s why we\u2019re posting her original piece here https://adflegal.org/blog/i-was-fastest-girl-connecticut-transgender-athletes-made-it-unfair-fight\u00a0\u2026. 3/3— Christiana Holcomb (@Christiana Holcomb) 1622051367
Author Abigail Shrier — who knows something about the subject (and getting deleted for her views) — weighed in as well:
Outrageous. @usatoday changed Mitchell's words, post-publication, on the grounds that the word "male" is hurtful.\n\nThe activists know well that Mitchell can't make her argument without that word.\n\nShame on the useful idiots of USAToday. \n\nIf only they had half Mitchell's courage.https://twitter.com/ChristianaADF/status/1397610845761425410\u00a0\u2026— Abigail Shrier (@Abigail Shrier) 1622082224
This is the second incident I've heard of where leftist propaganda outlets such as USA Today have altered words post-publication from conservative groups whose politics they oppose. Garbage.https://twitter.com/ChristianaADF/status/1397610845761425410\u00a0\u2026— Mollie (@Mollie) 1622080933
Absolutely incredible. You literally can't make an argument in corporate media with conceding to the terms set by the left.https://twitter.com/ChristianaADF/status/1397610845761425410\u00a0\u2026— Mark Hemingway (@Mark Hemingway) 1622080384
And U.S. Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) was only too happy to crack that quip:
Hey @USATODAY, since you\u2019ve decided to be a propoganda arm for the woke mob and silence a young female athlete, maybe also explain what the \u201cM\u201d and the \u201cW\u201d stand for here? It\u2019s your website. https://twitter.com/christianaadf/status/1397610845761425410\u00a0\u2026pic.twitter.com/lcz210sr85— Dan Crenshaw (@Dan Crenshaw) 1622133846
Anything else?
The below video is one example of what Mitchell and other female athletes have been up against. It's from the 2018 Connecticut girls' 100-meter dash. Mitchell is the third runner from the left. The runners to her left and right — Terry Miller and Andraya Yearwood — are transgender females.
The results? Mitchell came in fourth. Miller and Yearwood came in first and second, respectively. In fact, Miller set a meet record that day. But had Miller and Yearwood not been allowed to race against biological females, one might conclude that Mitchell would have finished higher that fourth.
Terry Miller of Bulkeley wins the 100m girls dash i. 11.72 (meet record). Andraya Yearwood of Cromwell 2nd, RHAM\u2019s Bridget Lalonde 3rd #cttrackpic.twitter.com/4GmLRyicDI— GameTimeCT (@GameTimeCT) 1528145089
Want to leave a tip?
We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?
Sr. Editor, News
Dave Urbanski is a senior editor for Blaze News.
DaveVUrbanski
Dave Urbanski
Sr. Editor, News
Dave Urbanski is a senior editor for Blaze News and has been writing for Blaze News since 2013. He has also been a newspaper reporter, a magazine editor, and a book editor. He resides in New Jersey. You can reach him at durbanski@blazemedia.com.
@DaveVUrbanski →more stories
Sign up for the Blaze newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.
© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Get the stories that matter most delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.