© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Federal judge halts controversial Texas abortion rule
An activist holds placards outside of the U.S. Supreme Court (Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images)

Federal judge halts controversial Texas abortion rule

A federal judge temporarily blocked the state of Texas on Thursday from implementing a new rule requiring burial or cremation for fetal remains following an abortion or miscarriage, according to the Houston Chronicle.

The Chronicle reported that U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks issued a temporary restraining order against the new rule, which would have gone into effect Monday.

The temporary restraining order follows a lawsuit to halt the rule filed by pro-choice organizations and activists.

TheBlaze previously reported that supporters of the rule contend that it protects both the dignity of unborn children and public health. Opponents argue that the rule is an effort to increase the costs associated with abortion, which will restrict access to the procedure.

Abortion clinics, which typically dispose of fetal remains as medical waste, would be subject to the rule. Women who suffer miscarriages at home would be exempt.

Republican Gov. Greg Abbott authorized the new regulation, arguing that fetal remains should not be “treated like medical waste and disposed of in landfills,” according to the Texas Tribune.

The Center for Reproductive Rights applauded the judge’s decision.

“We are pleased that the court has prevented these outrageous restrictions from going into effect in Texas, where they would have created immediate and dangerous new barriers on women’s access to health care,” David Brown, the organization’s senior staff attorney, said in a statement. “We look forward to demonstrating that these regulations are unwise, unjustified and unconstitutional, and should be permanently struck down.”

According to the Tribune, Texas Assistant Attorney General John Langley said during Thursday’s hearing that disposing of fetal remains as medical waste "is disrespectful.”

"The issue here today is whether or not the plaintiffs can show immediate threat of irreparable harm and they cannot," Langley said. "These regulations in no way, in any way shape or form, regulate women. They only regulate health care facilities."

Additional hearings about the rule will take place in the new year.

Want to leave a tip?

We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?