Watch LIVE

Gov't Could Adopt New Proposal to Rate Food Using...Stars

News

"...the most effective programs are those that trust consumers and not ones that tell consumers what they should and should not eat."

WASHINGTON (The Blaze/AP) — One star, two stars, three. Could this be a new designation for what's the healthier food option? A new recommendation to the Food and Drug Administration is saying we could all benefit from a front-of-the-package food label, which would help shoppers quickly identify the healthiest options, as Energy Star does for appliances.

It wouldn't replace the in-depth Nutrition Facts panel that's now on the back or side of food packages. But few shoppers stop to read or heed that fine print in the middle of the grocery aisle.

The Institute of Medicine's report says it's time to put right upfront the most important information for health: how many calories per serving — and just how big that serving is — along with stars or some other symbol to show at a glance how the food rates for certain fats, sodium and added sugars.

"American shoppers are busy shoppers," said Ellen Wartella, a psychology professor at Northwestern University who chaired the IOM committee that studied the issue at the government's request.

"We want a really simple system that says if you have three marks, that product is healthier than one with two marks."

The FDA already was working to change the food-labeling system to make it more user-friendly. The agency didn't say if it would adopt a ratings approach but called Thursday's report a thoughtful analysis that would help it decide next steps.

"FDA agrees consumers can benefit from a front-of-pack labeling system that conveys nutrition information in a manner that is simple and consistent with the Nutrition Facts panel," said spokeswoman Siobhan DeLancey.

But the IOM's recommendation would face an uphill battle with food manufacturers who are pushing their own version of on-the-front food labels and don't like the idea of ranking one food as healthier than a competitor's.

"We believe the most effective programs are those that trust consumers and not ones that tell consumers what they should and should not eat," said Scott Faber, a lobbyist for the Grocery Manufacturers Association.

The GMA's "Facts Up Front" label, supported by the FDA,  is probably something you've already seen before.

But IOM is recommending development of an even simpler front-of-package label.

Most recent
All Articles