Credit: New York Times
© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
New York Times Public Editor Margaret Sullivan took the Times to task (too much alliteration?) in a blog post Wednesday for a recent Obamacare-related story in the paper that employed the puzzling phrase "incorrect promise."
The phrase was used to describe President Obama's oft-repeated (and since proven wrong) statement that nobody would lose their existing health insurance plans once Obamacare was implemented.
"It is an awkward phrase. What, exactly, is an incorrect promise, anyway?" Sullivan writes. "Something more direct like 'false promise' would have been both clearer and more accurate."
Sullivan previously criticized the Times for an editorial which described Obama as having "clearly misspoke[n]" when he made the promise.
Want to leave a tip?
We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?
more stories
Sign up for the Blaze newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.
© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Get the stories that matter most delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.