Photo: Shutterstock/Gil C
© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Did an Editor Admit the New York Times Has a Double Standard for Palestinians and Israelis?
November 02, 2014
"If u give them a pass for bad behavior before they have a state what kind of state will they have."
A New York Times’ editorial page editor in a recent Twitter exchange with a pro-Israel media critic explained why readers should not expect to see op-eds on racism in Palestinian society anytime soon.
After New York Times opinion page staff editor Matt Seaton tweeted out the link to an op-ed published by the paper last week — which was written by an Arab citizen of Israel who detailed what she described as discriminatory policies in the Jewish State — Tamar Sternthal, a director at the pro-Israel media watchdog Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), replied to the editor with a jibe that the paper hadn’t “devoted a piece to Israeli racism in a whole month!”
Here was their exchange:
In a Times of Israel blog post, Sternthal explained her interpretation of Seaton’s words – which she termed a “stunning admission”:
A favored topic at The New York Times is the purported racism of Israeli society at large. It has been the topic, again and again, of Op-Eds, editorials and news stories. Conversely, Times editors seem ever reluctant to approach the subject of Palestinian racism, although there is no dearth of material there. […][I]t is now official that the Times Op-Ed pages are not interested in Palestinian racism, incitement, discrimination and ethno-religious purity. As stateless victims, they are beyond scrutiny.
Among the comments posted on Twitter following the Seaton-Sternthal exchange were those which echoed HBO host Bill Maher’s recent criticism of liberals who refrain from criticizing Islam due to "the soft bigotry of low expectations."
Why is @NYTimes so duplicitous? Editor @mattseaton admits holding Palestinians to lower standard https://t.co/qcjsh5Tsjk h/t @TamarSternthal
— Anthony Rek LeCounte (@RekLeCounte) October 30, 2014
@mattseaton @TamarSternthal so you wont cover ISIS evils because they don't have a sovereign state?
— Eugene Kontorovich (@EVKontorovich) October 29, 2014
@iminthegulag @TamarSternthal @mattseaton If u give them a pass for bad behaviour before they have a state what kind of state will they have
— Simson (@Johnny_Simson) October 30, 2014
@TamarSternthal question is why @nytimes is applying marginal "structuralist" standard, i.e., only states can be racist
— Ron Kampeas (@kampeas) October 30, 2014
CAMERA often criticizes the New York Times coverage of the Middle East which it says has promoted “a distorted picture of the region.”
Want to leave a tip?
We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?
more stories
Sign up for the Blaze newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.
© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Get the stories that matter most delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.