Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton (Image source: AP/The Canadian Press, Liam Richards)
© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Revealed: Hillary Clinton Possibly Violated Federal Rules During Tenure as Secretary of State
March 02, 2015
“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing..."
Hillary Clinton used only a personal email account to conduct official government business during her time as secretary of state, a move that possibly resulted in the violation of federal rules.
According to a New York Times report, Clinton never had a government email address during her four years at the State Department and her aides took no steps to archive her emails on the agency's servers as required by the Federal Records Act.
The revelation only came to light after the House Benghazi committee requested Clinton's correspondence in regards to the 2012 attacks. Clinton turned over approximately 300 emails to the committee that had all been sent on her personal address.
Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks to a crowd in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan on Wednesday, Jan. 21, 2015. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Liam Richards)
Jason R. Baron, a lawyer and former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration, told the Times he was very alarmed and perplexed by the report.
“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level-head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” he said.
The Times noted that other government officials and secretaries of state have used personal emails to conduct some government business in the past, but reported that officials found her exclusive use of the email odd.
“I can recall no instance in my time at the National Archives when a high-ranking official at an executive branch agency solely used a personal email account for the transaction of government business," Baron told the Times.
Director of the National Security Archive Thomas Blanton explained why a government address should be used by high-ranking officials.
“Personal emails are not secure,” he told the Times. “Senior officials should not be using them.”
The Times reported that Clinton did not respond to their request for comment.
—
Follow Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) on Twitter
Want to leave a tip?
We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?
more stories
Sign up for the Blaze newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.
© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Get the stories that matter most delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.