
Yuri Gripas/Abaca/Bloomberg via Getty Images

'A new low in American journalism'
The Los Angeles Times triggered a tsunami of backlash on Friday after publishing an article that seemingly jeered President Donald Trump for his coronavirus diagnosis.
The Times, one of America's largest newspapers, published a story Friday that was titled, "When Reagan was shot, country rallied around, but he hadn't spent months downplaying assassins."
The article goes on to say:
When President Reagan was shot and nearly killed by a would-be assassin, the country rallied around him. But he also hadn't spent eight months downplaying the threat of deranged gunmen.
...
Reagan grew from the experience. In his diary, he wrote he prayed for the man who shot him. The day fundamentally transformed the president's worldview. He believed his life had been spared by God for a reason — to reduce the threat of nuclear war. Do we expect Trump to evolve, to empathize more with those who caught the virus? To date, there's little evidence of that, but the example of Reagan might stand Trump and his White House in good stead.
The article was written by Los Angeles Times staff writer Del Quentin Wilber, whose bio identifies him "an enterprise and investigative reporter" — not an opinion writer — for the Times.
The Times was raked over the coals for publishing the sly implication that Trump was deserving of his COVID-19 diagnosis.
Many critics pointed to the story, and its framing, as evidence of why Americans do not trust the media.