Politics

Ugly attacks on conservative women like Ann Romney are all too common

S.E. Cupp is a New York Daily News columnist and TheBlaze TV host that has previously written for the Washington Post, Slate, Human Events, American Spectator,  […]
S.E. Cupp is a New York Daily News columnist and TheBlaze TV host that has previously written for the Washington Post, Slate, Human Events, American Spectator, FOXNews.com, NASCAR.com, the Detroit Free Press and others. As a political commentator, Cupp appears on TheBlaze TV's 'Real News' and MSNBC's 'The Cycle' daily. S.E. Cupp is the author of Losing Our Religion: The Liberal Media’s Attack on Christianity (Simon & Schuster, 2010) and co-author of Why You’re Wrong About The Right (Simon & Schuster, 2008). Read more about S.E.'s work at www.thesecupp.com
[ x ]

The hit-and-run job that Hillary Rosen did on Ann Romney is, unfortunately, all too common. Sexism and misogyny aren’t just for the boys, and it’s even more lamentable and ugly when they’re perpetrated by another woman. It’s the woman-on-woman crime that no one talks about.

There’s a sense amongst liberals — who read identity politics into most everything — that conservative women are somehow traitors to their gender (much the same way that black conservatives are traitors to their race and young conservatives are traitors to their generation). To be a conservative woman in the 21st century is to be, as Ann Romney found out, ripe for scorn and ridicule by the demonstrably intolerant left.

We’ve seen it before. Gloria Steinem is a repeat offender, having once referred to Kay Bailey Hutchison as a “female impersonator” and then later defaming Sarah Palin as “the wrong kind of woman.” Their fatal flaws, of course, were merely being Republicans. When women like Sarah Palin or Michele Bachmann are subjected to sexist and misogynist comments, by men or women, the women’s groups are noticeably silent. NOW, the National Organization for Women, only stands up for some women. Ann Romney should not expect their call.

The point of second-wave feminism was to give women more choices. When it turned out that some, like Phyllis Schlafly, chose conservatism, suddenly the women’s lib movement turned on women, and of all things, started criticizing their choices. It was as if they were saying that women could do anything they wanted, except vote Republican. That cannibalizing of the women’s movement, dividing them up along political lines and demonizing women who are pro-life or who stay home, like Ann Romney, is why in a 2005 CBS poll, only 24 percent of women said they considered themselves to be feminists, and 70 percent did not. Even more telling, only 12 percent said calling someone a feminist is a compliment.

When women turn on women, and take cheap shots at their decisions purely to score political points it serves as proof that feminism, as a movement, is dead and no longer relevant or credible. But that’s okay. Strong women like Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, and Ann Romney don’t need anyone else’s help. And as long as women like Gloria Steinem and Hillary Rosen keep talking, the true face of feminism will remain well-represented.

Comments (58)

  • dnha14
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:40pm

    All women work. It’s just that some of them bring their kids to work, every day.

    Report this comment

    dnha14  
  • dnha14
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:39pm

    Call me crazy, but isn’t one of the biggest platforms of the women’s movement to make sure that women have the “right to choose?” I guess some choices are just not “right” according to the feminazis.

    Report this comment

    dnha14  
    • CatB
      Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:00pm

      I was a stay at home mom .. after my son was in school .. I went back to school got a technical degree and set about having a “career” outside the home .. I was treated like a traitor by the feminazi types .. that I had dared to stay home I should be “punished” for that by not getting promotions and such. As my career went on I had headhunters seeking out my skills .. .I would not go on an interview if the job had a woman boss .. I never was treated badly or dismissively by the men .. only the women.

      Report this comment

      CatB  
    • rghtwngcrzy
      Posted on April 14, 2012 at 12:49am

      Like CATB, I went back to work after being a stay at home mom for 15 years. During interviews many of the HR women were very condescending to me, even for jobs where I was clearly over-qualified. Men were always polite and professional. There are women who say they believe a woman has the right to choose, but they only respect the decision if it is the one they agree with.

      Report this comment

      rghtwngcrzy  
  • RIChris
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:20pm

    “It was as if they were saying that women could do anything they wanted, except vote Republican.”

    That’s exactly what they are saying. All minorities and women who dare to leave the confines and dictates of the Democrat Party behind risk being shunned and/or vilified.

    Report this comment

    RIChris  
  • SerikFox
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:18pm

    I fail to understand this mentality of these feminists that “women should be at work instead of at home”. Sorry, doesn’t someone have to raise the kids at home? Isn’t it just as sexist to assume that the men should be staying at home instead of the women according to their logic? ‘Cause someone’s gotta be there for the kids. Isn’t it up to the family to figure out who stays at home? Why is it “not work” for a mother to stay at home with her kids? If it wasn’t work, then there would be no reason that a woman couldn’t simply leave her kids at home and go to work. And why should a feminist organization be telling women what they should do? Isn’t that a bit self defeating to their own goals? In short – many feminists are not for women; they want to be the ones telling other women what to do. They are striving to be their definition of men. That seems a little odd to me because, using their terms, if being an “empowered woman” is being a woman who wants to be like a feminist definition of a man, then aren’t they depowered because the “bar” is already set for them and they aren’t driving their own future like they want to? It seems to me that an empowered woman would be one who finds someone they love, and lives like they wish to – not one who tries to set standards for “what a ‘good’ woman should do”.

    Report this comment

    SerikFox  
    • SageInWaiting
      Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:11pm

      Simple:

      1. The kids get indoctrinated by the childcare/Head Start community at the expense of the parents’ tuition.
      2. The additional income pushes the family into a higher tax bracket, helping feed the government monster.
      3. Increased government oversight of the children.
      4. For the most extreme fems, children are a blight to be avoided; the employment environment places stresses on a woman that might limit procreation.
      5. POWER

      Report this comment

      SageInWaiting  
  • searching for the Truth
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:17pm

    I think it should be said for all women – one doesn’t have to be rich to be a work at home mom – but, it does take an enormous amount of self – sacrifice. Much, more so, for those that have to juggle another job as well.

    Report this comment

    searching for the Truth  
  • markinhawaii
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:03pm

    She was using a page out of the last election play book, like attacking Sarah Palin and others with kids.

    This is the way they really do see it, it’s not about kids, it’s about attacking people who did well in their lives. The Romney’s, started out struggling like every one else. Wish I coulda found a $66.00 a month apartment when I was starting out.

    Report this comment

    markinhawaii  
  • searching for the Truth
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:03pm

    Both sexes!

    Report this comment

    searching for the Truth  
  • searching for the Truth
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:02pm

    No. I think they all pretty much cower like a dog to money – unless they are grounded ( like electrical current ) to the Truth in Jesus Christ.

    Report this comment

    searching for the Truth  
  • Citizen_Joe
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:01pm

    Is it just me or are conservative women hotter than liberal woman… just saying… S.E. call me anytime… please

    Report this comment

    Citizen_Joe  
  • BellaMia7
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:52pm

    S.E., you are a asset to your gender and to all of humanity.

    Report this comment

    BellaMia7  
  • Just in time
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:27pm

    Conservative women are can do women And liberal women do complain about it. If a conservative woman had a flat tire. They would be looking for tire iron. If a liberal woman had a flat tire. They would be looking for a man.

    Report this comment

    Just in time  
  • NEVER.GIVE.IN
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:24pm

    I am a mom of 4 and I stay home. I grew up with my brothers and NEVER understood the feminist movement as anything but emotional irrationality
    If I want something, I earn it. I respect individuals, not classes of people. If I need to prove myself, I do so.
    I like men.
    How do you get so warped that you believe Men are out to get you —–except for the men in your life? How do you believe the same “system” with the power to “oppress” you allows you to whine unceasingly about it? How do you choose anger and ‘helplessness’ over making the life you want? Feminism is ugly.

    Report this comment

    NEVER.GIVE.IN  
    • Anse
      Posted on April 14, 2012 at 1:09am

      well at least you’re aware that you don’t understand it

      Report this comment

      Anse  
  • Intense66
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:21pm

    I’m a college educated, conservative, gun-totin’ woman from Oklahoma and I own a business in the predominately male field of oilfield services. I am happily hetero & pro-life and if having babies had ever been possible for me, I would have been a stay at home mom as well. Hey liberals…stick that in your pipe and smoke it because you have nothing that compares to what we can do!

    Report this comment

    Intense66  
  • sbenard
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:05pm

    I think LIBERAL women are the “traitors”, and I’m right!

    Report this comment

    sbenard  
  • Doc Hickory
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:05pm

    S. E. Cupp said it all. The soul of wit is brevity, and in a few short paragraphs she exposes the blatant hypocrisy of the so-called feminists/leftists. The liberal left will tolerate anything but a differing opinion. They demand a lockstep conformity to their own ideology and woe unto the woman who chooses conservatism. Ann Romney made her choices, accepted whatever the consequences of those choices were, and didn’t whine. Libs might draw a lesson from her example.

    Report this comment

    Doc Hickory  
  • SavvyCowboy
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:03pm

    My Conservative wife has great shot groupings as do my Conservative daughters. They’re hot-packin’ Mamas, that’s for sure. Don’t screw with them or you’ll wind up dinner for our hungry coyotes! :)

    Live FREE or Die.

    Report this comment

    SavvyCowboy  
  • love the kids
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:01pm

    Liberals are all for womens choices, that is until their choice is to stay at home with the kids, or they choose to support or be person who thinks they should spend less than they bring in, or they want a child that would live outside of the womb a chance to live.
    Who really is at war with women, is it liberals???

    Report this comment

    love the kids  
  • littlefish
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:58am

    Liberals are always right . . .how ironic is that ?

    Report this comment

    littlefish  
  • AnAmericanToo
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:56am

    I attended a graduate school program that had numerous lesbian professors and several homosexual males. One of the lesbian professors hated married women and so expressed it in class to the entire class. She was emotionally unbalanced. She had serious problems which included but was not limited to arriving to class weeping. The students were shoring up their emotional distraught professor. Yet, she continued in her job because the university was in awe that she came from an Ivy League university. I would suggest that Hillary Rosen’s bitter and judgmental statements about Mrs. Mitt Romney might just have a similar thread of contempt of married heterosexual women running through it as my former professor.

    Report this comment

    AnAmericanToo  
    • smartiepants
      Posted on April 17, 2012 at 11:44am

      Spot on SE Cupp!! “There’s a sense amongst liberals — who read identity politics into most everything..” There is a US law school that dismisses every conservative/republican female in the student body they discover. (Hitler is back!) The threats of educating these women are so high, that law professors are willing to cheat, lie, and steal just to weed them out. The liberal professors have a hard time watching these women juggle family, religion, and education successfully. The dean of the law school rewards the professors that intentionally failed them. I know because I worked there. Every year this school profiles the graduating class but only allows half of them to take the bar, thus creating a fake bar passage rate for the public. Where’s the ABA???? When this was reported to the former dean, he silently resigned. I think the traitor is the new dean, because the integrity of the law is at issue. Each year liberals attend this school for FREE on the backs of conservative/republican women. @ANAMERICANTOO, the unbalanced emotional state of liberal professors is created by the rude awakening that “they were handed a degree they didn’t earn and someone caught them” I can’t imagine spending my life with my hand in a cookie jar, no thanks I’ll make my own from scratch.

      Report this comment

      smartiepants  
  • USACommoner
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:50am

    I have SO much respect for Conservative women. It takes so much strength and courage today to stand up for what you believe in and still be able to withstand the onslaught of nastiness you get because of it. Sure, it would be an easier route to just go along to get along, but those women who have the strength of conviction to stand their ground are to be admired and greatly respected. Stand strong, ladies. You are Aces in my book.

    Report this comment

    USACommoner  
  • oswell
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:50am

    Yeah liberals love women, but only women who depend on government welfare, not strong independent women, but what do you expect from Marxists?

    Report this comment

    oswell  
  • Wakeup Maggie
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:44am

    Shameful, these are angry and delusional poor excuses for women

    Report this comment

    Wakeup Maggie  
  • monkeyoffmyback
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:34am

    I guess Rosen could be called a “strap-on” mom (or dad), Right? Not a stay-at-home———-

    Report this comment

    monkeyoffmyback  
  • bigpew
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:33am

    Amen

    Report this comment

    bigpew  
  • T Mark Gray
    Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:27am

    The problem is that we have believed that “women’s lib” meant “women’s liberation” when it actually stands for “women’s liberalization”.

    Report this comment

    T Mark Gray  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In