© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Horowitz: Letter to FAA warns that federal law prohibits commercial pilots from flying after taking experimental shots
Pavlo Gonchar/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images

Horowitz: Letter to FAA warns that federal law prohibits commercial pilots from flying after taking experimental shots

Just how far have we devolved from typical medical protocols when it comes to mandating experimental shots on everyone? According to a group of lawyers along with doctors familiar with health care protocols in civilian and military aviation, pilots are actually prohibited from flying after taking a non-FDA-approved treatment or one that was approved less than 12 months ago.

Lawyers for Children’s Health Defense, along with several doctors including Lt. Col. Theresa Long, Peter McCullough, and Ryan Cole, recently sent a letter to the FAA and the CEOs of all the major airlines warning that anyone who got the shots, under current regulations, should be subject to a 12-month do-not-fly status. The relevant statute, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations §61.53, states, “No person who holds a medical certificate issued under part 67 of this chapter may act as pilot in command, or in any other capacity as a required pilot flight crewmember, while that person ... [is] receiving treatment for a medical condition that results in the person being unable to meet the requirements for the medical certificate necessary for the pilot operation.”

While this statute is wide open, the prevailing regulation under the Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners states that examiners should “advise airmen to not fly (DNF) and provide additional safety information to the applicant if they are taking several types of medical therapeutics, including anything approved by the FDA within 12 months.”

FAA generally requires at least one-year of post-marketing experience with a new drug before consideration for aeromedical certification purposes,” the authors warn in the letter. “This observation period allows time for uncommon, but aeromedically significant, adverse effects to manifest themselves ...” (emphasis added).

Isn’t that interesting – that we’d actually want to follow up on uncommon adverse events? Well, here we are with the most rushed vaccine in history, for which none of the commercially available versions have even gotten full FDA approval (Comirnaty is not yet available) and the numerous side effects are common and ubiquitous beyond belief, yet Biden is mandating the vaccine on pilots! Every commercially available vaccine is still under Emergency Use Authorization status. A federal judge in Florida recently found the government’s argument that Pfizer is interchangeable with Comirnaty to be “unconvincing.”

Thus, not a single “vaccinated” pilot who has been flying has received an FDA-approved vaccine and most certainly has not waited the required 12 months post-approval. Just how far has the aviation industry deviated from the law? Commercial pilots only wait 48 hours after having the shots, while military pilots can fly again after just 12 hours. Studies have shown that the average time it takes for myocarditis to present in injected patients is seven days after the shot, but it could take as long as 40 days to become apparent.

Typically, the aviation industry uses the most stringent protocols accounting for the worst-case scenarios for risk assessment of the pilot’s safety after undergoing a medical treatment. “Ordinary military aviation has more stringent medical standards than the FAA,” said one of the authors, Dr. Peter Chambers, in an interview with TheBlaze. “However, both failed to adhere to long-standing risk mitigation and aeromedical safety measures critical to safety of flight, especially with regard to widespread use of an experimental drug with the least long- and short-term safety data ever used by pilots in the history of modern aviation.”

Chambers is a rare gem in the military. He is a flight surgeon and a lieutenant colonel Green Beret, making him one of the few members of the Special Forces with a medical degree. He is currently in the Texas National Guard doing border missions after having served in the Texas COVID response missions last year.

The Special Forces doctor believes he himself was severely injured by the Moderna shot and now suffers from a brain bleed. “After serving 38 years in the military and getting every vaccine known to man, I trusted my government on this one,” said Chambers in describing his initial overcoming of concerns. “After the second shot in March, I developed pretty serious vertigo, brain fog, and unsteadiness of gait. I started taking ivermectin to counter the spike protein. I eventually got an MRI several weeks ago, and changes on it were commensurate with others who had cerebral vascular accidents following the mRNA vaccine.”

Chambers is convinced the shots caused the brain bleed because he had six other soldiers who experienced “the same symptoms and MRI findings around six months after the shot.” Two men in their 40s had to undergo surgery, and one had to learn to speak again. Chambers said that he is having a secondary neurological follow-up to deal with his own injury.

The experience with vaccine injury has harmed Chambers’ work on the ground, which makes him all the more fearful of the consequences for pilots flying in the air.

Chambers and the signing attorneys attached a list of 10 known cases of otherwise healthy pilots who reported adverse events to the VAERS. The ailments included myocardial infarction (heart attack), atrial fibrillation, pericarditis, brain swelling, elevated intra-cranial pressure affecting spinal cord and brain stem, sub-arachnoid hemorrhages (brain bleed), blindness. Needless to say, these are not the sorts of injuries you want when flying a commercial plane. We’ve all seen the hundreds of cases of young athletes suddenly dropping on the playing field. Imagine if we are to see that in a pilot mid-flight. Vertigo, which is a particularly menacing ailment for pilots, is a known common side effect of the COVID shots.

“In sum, neither the law nor common sense countenances that federal agencies charged with ensuring public safety ignore concerning data and thereby jeopardize public safety,” concludes the letter. “Nor do law and commonsense countenance ignoring information that evinces that both pilots and the passengers they serveare at risk of severe injury and possibly death. Finally, neither precept countenances killing a planefull of hundreds of Americans because a commercial pilot loses control of their aircraft aftersuffering a major blood clot, seizure, or myocarditis-related event, which in turn causes his jet to beinvolved in a fatal catastrophic crash ... before regulators decide to finally act.”

The doctors who signed the letter recommended that every pilot who got the shot be “immediately flagged and medically re-certified only after showing aeromedically acceptable D-Dimer, Troponin, ECGs, cardiac MRIs and PULS tests, and otherwise clean bills of health.”

D-dimer tests would easily show who is suffering micro-clotting, and troponin tests measure for the protein that is released when heart muscle is damaged. A recent study showed that PULS tests were critical in surveilling comprehensive cardiac damage done by the shots. Numerous heart health markers from the PULS testing showed that the risk of acute coronary syndrome more than doubled in patients who got the shots, from 11% to 25%.

This letter raises some serious concerns as to how far our government is willing to go in covering up safety concerns about the shots. We have safety regulations for a reason. Shouting “emergency” for a pandemic that is no longer acute and for which the shots no longer work should not drown out the voices of those raising concerns about an industry that relies upon optimal levels of safety at all times.

Want to leave a tip?

We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?
Daniel Horowitz

Daniel Horowitz

Blaze Podcast Host

Daniel Horowitz is the host of “Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz” and a senior editor for Blaze News.
@RMConservative →