© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
FDNY Firefighter Outraged After His Image is Photoshopped & Used to Push 9/11 Lawsuits

FDNY Firefighter Outraged After His Image is Photoshopped & Used to Push 9/11 Lawsuits

"He really signed his rights away."

"I was there," the text next to the picture of NYC firefighter Robert Keiley, who's holding a picture of World Trade Center ruins, says. There's only one problem: he wasn't.

Keiley's hazel eyes and rugged face are featured in a new ad for the law firm Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, which is trying to increase participants in its class-action lawsuit against the city in the wake of post-9/11 health issues. "I was there," the ad reads, "and now Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern is there for me."

But here's the thing: Keiley didn't join the FDNY until 2004, three yeas after the attacks. And he's furious his image popped up in the ad, despite posing for it as part of a modeling side job.

"It's an insult to the Fire Department. It's an insult to all the families who lost people that day," Keiley, 34, who used to be a cop, told the New York Post.

"It makes me look like I'm cashing in on 9/11, saying I was there even though I was never there, and that I'm sick and possibly suing, trying to get a chunk of money," he added.

But there's also another problem. In the original photo shoot, Keiley was never holding a picture of the World Trade Center. Rather, he posed with a firefighter's helmet -- the picture was later photoshopped in.

"I had friends who died on 9/11," Keiley, who's considering a lawsuit against the firm, told the Post. "How can I look their families in the eye if they see this picture, thinking I'm trying to make money on their [loved ones'] deaths? They'd probably think I'm a scumbag."

To be fair, the ad does have some fine print at the bottom: "This is an actor portrayal of a potential Zadroga claimant," which refers to 9/11 workers who could receive settlement money under the federal James Zadroga Act.

A representative for the ad agency behind the picture said it didn't do anything wrong.

"He really signed his rights away," Kim Tracey, an account director at the agency Barker/DZP told the Post. "[The release] allows for use in ads, promotional usage, really anything you want."

Megyn Kelly debated the topic on her Monday segment of "Kelly's Court:"

The controversy is reminiscent of another picture that sparked outrage in New York City last month. Then, a pro-life group used a stock image of a young black girl on a billboard that said, "The Most Dangerous Place for an African American is in the Womb.” The ad agency behind the billboard eventually pulled the ad.

What do you think?

Want to leave a tip?

We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?