© 2025 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
White House Releases Dire State-by-State List of Sequestration Ramifications
US President Barack Obama delivers remarks joined by emergency responders to urge action to avoid the automatic budget cuts scheduled to hit next Friday if Congress fails to find a path forward on balanced deficit reduction during an event at the White House in Washington, DC, February 19, 2013. (Photo: AFP/Getty Images)

White House Releases Dire State-by-State List of Sequestration Ramifications

“Republicans are making a policy choice that these cuts are better for the economy than eliminating tax loopholes that benefit the wealthy."

US President Barack Obama delivers remarks joined by emergency responders to urge action to avoid the automatic budget cuts scheduled to hit next Friday if Congress fails to find a path forward on balanced deficit reduction during an event at the White House in Washington, DC, February 19, 2013. (Photo: AFP/Getty Images)

On Sunday, the White House continued its effort to prevent the $85 billion in automatic spending cuts known as "sequestration" from starting this Friday, releasing a dramatic state-by-state list of how they claim each state will be impacted if Congress fails to act.

It's worth remembering that the "cut" is only to the projected increase in spending, not to what we are currently spending.

White House political director Dan Pfeiffer said on a call Sunday, according to the Hill, that the sequester is only going to happen if Republicans refuse to compromise.

He added: “Republicans are making a policy choice that these cuts are better for the economy than eliminating tax loopholes that benefit the wealthy."

Republicans have countered by noting that the sequester was an idea originally pushed by the White House, and they have several times attempted to avert the cuts.

House Speaker John Boehner's spokesman Michael Steel said in a statement: "Republicans in the House have voted - twice - to replace President Obama's sequester with smarter spending cuts. The White House needs to spend less time explaining to the press how bad the sequester will be and more time actually working to stop it."

 

Either way, here's what the White House claims will happen in each state if the sequester goes through (via the Wall Street Journal):

     

  1. Alabama
  2.  

  3. Alaska
  4.  

  5. Arizona
  6.  

  7. Arkansas
  8.  

  9. California
  10.  

  11. Colorado
  12.  

  13. Connecticut
  14.  

  15. Delaware
  16.  

  17. District of Columbia
  18.  

  19. Florida
  20.  

  21. Georgia
  22.  

  23. Hawaii
  24.  

  25. Idaho
  26.  

  27. Illinois
  28.  

  29. Indiana
  30.  

  31. Iowa
  32.  

  33. Kansas
  34.  

  35. Kentucky
  36.  

  37. Louisiana
  38.  

  39. Maine
  40.  

  41. Maryland
  42.  

  43. Massachusetts
  44.  

  45. Michigan
  46.  

  47. Minnesota
  48.  

  49. Mississippi
  50.  

  51. Missouri
  52.  

  53. Montana
  54.  

  55. Nebraska
  56.  

  57. Nevada
  58.  

  59. New Hampshire
  60.  

  61. New Jersey
  62.  

  63. New Mexico
  64.  

  65. New York
  66.  

  67. North Carolina
  68.  

  69. North Dakota
  70.  

  71. Ohio
  72.  

  73. Oklahoma
  74.  

  75. Oregon
  76.  

  77. Pennsylvania
  78.  

  79. Rhode Island
  80.  

  81. South Carolina
  82.  

  83. South Dakota
  84.  

  85. Tennessee
  86.  

  87. Texas
  88.  

  89. Utah
  90.  

  91. Vermont
  92.  

  93. Virginia
  94.  

  95. Washington
  96.  

  97. West Virginia
  98.  

  99. Wisconsin
  100.  

  101. Wyoming

John McCain said on CNN's State of the Union today that the across-the-board sequestration cuts are a "cowardly" way to tackle the budget, and the "worst" way to go about it:

Want to leave a tip?

We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?