Over at Red State, Erick Erickson posits this interesting observation:
Within the media coverage Gosnell is either a story they covered in 2011 or something they won’t cover at all. If they cover it now, they do so in passing so they can say they covered it. But they won’t devote the resources to it as they would if Gosnell had killed dogs. He only killed babies.
It's an interesting albeit sad thought -- what if Gosnell had killed dogs instead of babies?
A Google search for "Kermit Gosnell abortion" returns about 250,000 results across the web.
A Google search for "Michael Vick dog" returns more than 5,000,000results.