
© 2025 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Over at Red State, Erick Erickson posits this interesting observation:
Within the media coverage Gosnell is either a story they covered in 2011 or something they won’t cover at all. If they cover it now, they do so in passing so they can say they covered it. But they won’t devote the resources to it as they would if Gosnell had killed dogs. He only killed babies.
It's an interesting albeit sad thought -- what if Gosnell had killed dogs instead of babies?
A Google search for "Kermit Gosnell abortion" returns about 250,000 results across the web.
A Google search for "Michael Vick dog" returns more than 5,000,000 results.
Want to leave a tip?
We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?
more stories
Sign up for the Blaze newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.
Related Content
© 2025 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Get the stories that matter most delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.






