© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Classic case of misdirection': Post fact checker evaluates WH claim on canceled insurance policies
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius arrives in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, Monday, Oct. 21, 2013, for and event with President Barack Obama on the initial rollout of the health care overhaul. Obama acknowledged that the widespread problems with his health care law's rollout are unacceptable, as the administration scrambles to fix the cascade of computer issues. (AP/ Evan Vucci)

Classic case of misdirection': Post fact checker evaluates WH claim on canceled insurance policies

Of the White House's attempt to blame private companies for millions of Americans losing their health insurance policies under Obamacare, the Washington Post fact checker issued its ruling:

Blaming the insurance companies can only go so far. First of all, the administration wrote the rules that set the conditions under which plans lose their grandfather status. But more important, the law has an effective date so far in the past that it virtually guaranteed that the vast majority of people currently in the individual market would end up with a notice saying they needed to buy insurance on the Obamacare exchanges.

The administration’s effort to pin the blame on insurance companies is a classic case of misdirection. Between 75 and 95 percent of the problem stems from the effective date, but the White House chooses to keep the focus elsewhere.

The fact checker gave the White House "three pinocchios," a rating that signals a claim's "significant factual error and/or obvious contradictions."

@eScarry

Want to leave a tip?

We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?