
Brett Carlsen/Getty Images

Golf champion Phil Mickelson ignited a social media firestorm late last week after posing a question about the Omicron variant of COVID-19 that cut against the grain of the COVID narrative.
Invoking data that suggest the Omicron variant "is contagious but not deadly," Mickelson asked why public health officials are still trying to control the spread of Omicron rather than boosting immunity development.
"Serious question since I’m not a dr. If omicron is contagious but not deadly(25,000 cases in Africa with no deaths) why try and control it? Why not let it go and let people get it and develop immunity? Especially for those who won’t get vaccinated? Pls no hate, I’m just curious," Mickelson said on Twitter.
Serious question since I\u2019m not a dr. If omicron is contagious but not deadly(25,000 cases in Africa with no deaths) why try and control it? Why not let it go and let people get it and develop immunity? Especially for those who won\u2019t get vaccinated? Pls no hate, I\u2019m just curious.— Phil Mickelson (@Phil Mickelson) 1640301627
Mickelson's question triggered a wave of responses, which were both critical and supportive of Mickelson's suggestion.
While the Omicron variant has been responsible for massive spikes in COVID-19 cases, data suggest the variant is milder than previous COVID-19 variants because it has not driven a corresponding spike in hospitalizations and deaths.
However, public health officials have not responded in kind. Instead, schools across the nation are returning to remote learning, mask mandates are being re-enacted, and Democratic leaders are implementing vaccine mandates and entry requirements that include booster shots. All in the spirit of mitigating risk from Omicron, they say.