Get BlazeTV

‘When are lies justified in pursuit of a political cause?’

We at The Blaze have been examining the ethics of undercover journalism.

The Washington Post's Michael Gerson -- former policy adviser and chief speechwriter to President George W. Bush and, of equivalent distinction, my roommate in college -- had an interesting write-up regarding the important question: "When are lies justified in pursuit of a political cause?"

Gerson contends:

The ethics of lying, of course, are complex. The prohibition against bearing false witness made the Ten Commandments cut. But I suspect that Moses would allow for lying to hide a Jew hunted by the Nazis. This does not make the prohibition against lying minor or relative. It is a recognition that competing moral duties can be more urgent and compelling — in this case, the moral duty to save a life. A spy tells lies to protect his country. A general engages in deception to defeat an enemy.

But there can be no moral duty to deceive in order to entrap a political opponent with a hidden camera. There is no ethical imperative to provide a prostitute to a weak man and then videotape the scandal, or to provide drugs to a recovering addict and then report the result — or to promise $5 million to a radio executive to get him nodding to leading questions.

Click here to continue reading his op-ed at The Washington Post.

One last thing…
Watch TheBlaze live and on demand on any device, anywhere, anytime.
try premium
Exclusive video
All Videos
Watch BlazeTV on your favorite device, anytime, anywhere.
Subscribe Now
Daily News Highlights

Get the news that matters most delivered directly to your inbox.