© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
"I have had my 'love pats' every single flight..."
While some are decrying the new, more invasive security pat-downs at airports as "groping" or even sexual assault, one U.S. Senator is putting a positive spin on the sensitive situation.
Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., defended the new procedures as necessary security measures and seemed to dismiss public outrage Wednesday in describing the process as little more than "love pats."
McCaskill insisted the TSA was in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" no-win situation as air travelers would be angry at TSA if Christmas bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab had succeeded in his attempted underwear bombing last Christmas. She went onto say the new advanced imaging technology and pat-down procedures are more of a blessing than a curse.
"I'm wildly excited that I can walk through a machine instead of getting my dose of love pats," Sen. McCaskill said.
Want to leave a tip?
We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?
more stories
Sign up for the Blaze newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.
© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Get the stories that matter most delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.