Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), speaks at the 2013 Values Voter Summit, held by the Family Research Council, on October 11, 2013 in Washington, D.C. (Getty Images)
© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Scathing editorial in Wednesday's Wall Street Journal, regarding Sen. Rand Paul's (R-Ky.) defense of admitted NSA leaker Edward Snowden:
As President, Mr. Paul couldn't behave like some ACLU legal gadfly. He'd be responsible for setting standards for the entire security bureaucracy. To offer Mr. Snowden leniency on such terms would send a signal that any federal employee could leak any secret as long as he claims a higher moral cause. ...If Mr. Paul wants to make that case, he can do so in the GOP primaries. We don't agree, and we doubt the courts or the American public will either. But arguing that Edward Snowden is some kind of national hero shows an unseriousness about national security that would make him unsuitable to be Commander in Chief.
Paul said on ABC's "This Week" on Sunday that the U.S. government should plea bargain with Snowden and that the fugitive, currently hiding in Russia, doesn't deserve the death penalty or a life sentence.
Rep. Peter King (R-NY) said that Paul "disgraced his office" for defending Snowden.
Paul said in December he's "seriously thinking about" running for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination.
Want to leave a tip?
We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?
more stories
Sign up for the Blaze newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.
© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Get the stories that matter most delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.