A recently posted analysis from a Federal Reserve economist estimated that the U.S. could see in excess of 47 million job losses related to the coronavirus crisis and an unemployment rate that tops 32% in the coming months.
What did the Fed's post say?
On Thursday, first-time weekly jobless claims hit a record high of 3.3 million, more than double the number of losses experts had projected.
Last week, Migeul Faria e Castro, an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, posted a "back-of-the-envelope estimate" for what kind of job-loss numbers and unemployment figures the country could see by the end of the second quarter.
Combining that figure with other estimates about jobs that have a high risk of being lost, Castro estimated that 47.05 million people would be laid off during the second quarter of 2020.
Castro then extrapolated that with 47 million lost jobs, the U.S. would have an unemployment rate of 32.1% by the end of June.
- Civilian labor force in February 2020 = 164.5 million
- Unemployment rate in February 2020 = 3.5%
- Unemployed persons in February 2020 = 5.76 million (#1 * #2)
- Workers in occupations with high risk of layoff = 66.8 million
- Workers in high contact-intensive occupations = 27.3 million
- Estimated layoffs in second quarter 2020 = 47.05 million (Average of #4 and #5)
- Unemployed persons in second quarter 2020 = 52.81 million (#3 + #6)
- Unemployment rate in second quarter 2020 = 32.1% (#7 / #1)
Which employees are 'at high risk of layoff'?
To calculate which workers are "at high risk of layoff," Gascon said he classified the 808 BLS-detailed occupations based on three criteria:
- Occupations essential to public health or safety (e.g., police)
- Occupations where work can likely be completed off-site (e.g., computer programmers)
- Positions likely to be salaried (e.g., elementary school teachers)
He found that 46% of workers appear to be in "high risk of layoff" jobs. Not surprisingly, the largest share (9%) of those jobs are in food prep or serving-related business; followed closely by jobs in sales (7%) — mostly retail workers.
Image source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis screenshot
Is there any good news?
Castro noted that it is the length of unemployment that matters more than the unemployment rate.
The suddenness of the virus and various governments' reactions to it have caused the sudden and coming spike in joblessness. However, if the virus peaks in a few weeks and businesses can reopen shortly thereafter, people could be going back to work by the end of the second quarter or beginning of the third.
Moreover, one can argue that the expected duration of unemployment matters more than the unemployment rate itself, especially if the recovery is quick (and so duration is short). These are very large numbers by historical standards, but this is a rather unique shock that is unlike any other experienced by the U.S. economy in the last 100 years.