© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Obama needs a security state -- here's why

Obama needs a security state -- here's why

Over at NRO, David French makes the thoughtful argument that President Obama actually wants surveillance & security state.

Why?

Because his own policies necessitate it:

President Obama came into office selling the American people on a fiction: that we could quickly wind down the offensive fight, roll back the defensive security state, and we’d still be safe. This fiction couldn’t survive security briefings. So what did he do? He left the Bush defensive infrastructure in place while winding down our commitment to offensive military operations (with the notable exception of pinprick drone strikes). We wound down our offense without inflicting the damage we should have inflicted (in Afghanistan, primarily) on an announced timetable, and without leaving a residual force (in Iraq) or perhaps sufficient residual force (in Afghanistan). These factors give our wounded enemy an opportunity to hunker down, wait for our departure, and then face much weaker forces when it re-emerges in force and attempts to establish the kinds of safe havens and training camps that render it exponentially more dangerous.

If this happens, then our risks skyrocket, and our defensive capabilities become that much more important. He has to know this. Anyone with the slightest familiarity with our enemy has to know this. [...]

Here is our reality: Al-Qaeda and its allies are wounded, not dead. A nation tired of supporting a ground war is pulling back, and in pulling back we are taking (and magnifying) risks that can only be reasonably mitigated through strong and effective defensive measures. That’s the reality that President Obama knows (or should know), and that’s a reality that he has utterly failed to adequately explain. It’s also — critically — a reality with which critics of our defense should grapple. Most of them, coincidentally, are also critics of our offensive measures. If we can’t go strike the enemy at his heart, and we dramatically limit our ability to create defensive information systems, how do we defend ourselves effectively?

After all, we can’t just wish our enemy away.

Want to leave a tip?

We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?